|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lower Octane=Better Performance????
I was just web browsing and I stumbled onto this forum
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/arch.../t-320627.html where they say that if you want better performance you should go with less octane. They say that higher octane is better cuz it burns slower and wont mess up your engine but lower gives better performance. I need someone like nissanfanatic to explain this one, unless someone else knows what they're talking about.
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lower Octane=Better Performance????
Alright, higher octane fuel does burn slower. In high compression applications, you need a slower burning fuel because there is much more heat involved so the combusion process begins earlier uncontrollably. As anyone knows, compressing air creates heat. Some diesel engines run solely on heat created by compression. Ever tried to light diesel? It really doesn't burn very well at all. With high compression, nitrous, and FI applications, if you use too low of an octane fuel, most likely you will expirience pre ignition and possibly detonation. Pre ignition will raise EGTs considerably and may cause detontaion.
If you try running a higher octane fuel and expirience lower performance, you can either go to a lower octane fuel or try advancing the timing. Looking at spark plugs is a good indicator for the average joe that isn't equipped. Be careful when advancing timing as you can run into detonation if you advance too far. So the whole thing is "Run the octane appropriate for your application," not so much "This octane is better,"
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lower Octane=Better Performance????
what are the pros and cons of !) running on low octane and 2)running on high octane????
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lower Octane=Better Performance????
never mind the question, just read the article
__________________
![]() 1991 240SX KA24DE |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lower Octane=Better Performance????
Thanks Fanatic. I knew if anyone was going to explain this to me u sure would be up to the challenge
__________________
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lower Octane=Better Performance????
no problem
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|