|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
02-27-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
b16a or ls vtec
my question goes out to the people with 88- 91 civic hbs............which is a better swap an sir2 or an ls vtec engine..........i know the stats of both but not sure on which one to buy
|
|
#2
02-27-2005, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: b16a or ls vtec
ls vtec if built right, if not then b16
|
|
#3
02-27-2005, 11:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
b16
more trustworthy
__________________
_________________________________http://VelocityFactor.com________________________________ 1990 si hatch b20b si tranny megan race header 2.5 custom exhaust 50 shot integra da rear disk (w/ 4040 valve) powerslot rotors and barded lines all around 1994 Dx hatch stock
|
|
#4
02-27-2005, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: b16a or ls vtec
Quote:
|
|
#6
02-28-2005, 04:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: b16a or ls vtec
Everyone is going to say which motor they think is best... Heck, I say go LS Vtec... But that's just my opinion. Do the research and go for it. Otherwise, you'll hear everything from the SiR to the GSR.
__________________
"Short, sweet, and to the point" 1987 CRX Si - Project Si 'RexSi' 1996 Ford Thunderbird 4.6L V8 - Plastic Intake Manifold, FTL. 2004 Nissan Sentra, 1.8s - The "s" stands for smooth....... ?
|
|
#8
02-28-2005, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: b16a or ls vtec
lsvtec is better to build
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
