-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Which and Why
Toyota Celica GT 94-99 2 11.76%
Honda Prelude si/vtec 93+ 8 47.06%
Mitsubishi Eclipse 95-99 3 17.65%
Acura Integra 94+ 4 23.53%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-18-2005, 06:41 PM
Emberghost Emberghost is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool New car time, but which!?

So in May I will be buying a new car with about 6-7k to use. It will be my 17th birthday so insurance on these is an issue as well. Currently I have been driving a 94 corolla for a while, and while it's a blast to drive *hah* I think it's finally time to get something new. I don't need a power plant of a car but I would like something with a little pep. So far the cars that interest me seem to be:

Toyota Celica GT 94-99
Honda Prelude si/vtec 93+
Mitsubishi Eclipse 95-99
Acura Integra 94+

Now I know this list might seem a little *ricer* to some of yall but that's hardly my intent. I like keeping a car nice and clean looking, nothing flashy and all. Reliability would also be a concern of mine, as I don't want to be stranded all the time. Must also be 90+ because of airbags.

Are there one of these cars on the list that stand out to you for a certain reason? Or a car that you think would be suited for me that I haven't listed.

The *dream* items of mine would be a manual, rwd, t-top. But usually that combo does not come with a good price or reliability.

Thanks for reading
  #2  
Old 02-18-2005, 08:14 PM
clawhammer's Avatar
clawhammer clawhammer is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,945
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: New car time, but which!?

I'm going with the Celica, but no real good reason. I do like the way that they look, but don't know performance stats on them. You are aware that none of the cars on the list are rwd or have t-tops, right? Since you're young I think it would be best if you stayed with fwd, at least until you get some more experience, you'll be less likely to crash it.
  #3  
Old 02-18-2005, 09:16 PM
Emberghost Emberghost is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: New car time, but which!?

Yes I do know, that's why I put it with the *dream*. Thanks for the input.
  #4  
Old 02-18-2005, 10:16 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: New car time, but which!?

The Integra and the Prelude are the best cars on that list, but the most expensive. The Celica is extremely reliable and pretty cheap, but the performance is the lowest of the bunch. The Eclipse has decent performance and a low price, but the reliability is kinda shady. My pick would be a nice Integra GS-R, but if you don't have the funds for that, go with the Celica.
  #5  
Old 02-19-2005, 02:43 AM
Broke_as_****'s Avatar
Broke_as_**** Broke_as_**** is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: New car time, but which!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emberghost
The *dream* items of mine would be a manual, rwd, t-top. But usually that combo does not come with a good price or reliability.
[blatantZflagwaving]Sure it does, 300ZX non-turbo. With proper maintence, 200,000 miles on a Z32 is easy enough. Check you local listings, probably find one in good shape for under $5000.[/blatantZflagwaving]
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo


Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were.
  #6  
Old 02-19-2005, 03:10 AM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: New car time, but which!?

Yeah, you can get RWD, manual, and T-Tops pretty cheaply. The 300ZX comes with T-Tops, and I believe the V6 Camaro and Firebird come with them as well; if not, you can get the 93-97 LT1 models for well under 10 grand, and those come with them.
  #7  
Old 02-19-2005, 11:44 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
Re: New car time, but which!?

It is very rare to find a Z32 w/o T-Tops...a local guy here has one and I knew Ash Powers...he had one too...but he's now up at Z1 Motorsports in GA.
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


  #8  
Old 02-19-2005, 12:16 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
i would never pick the celica over any of those cars. that engine only has 140hp from a camry 4 banger. the hottest celica could only run a 16.5 stock and 0-60 in the 8's. i doubt you can find performance parts for that engine. finding it is like finding performance parts for a 4 banger camry. the only way i think you can give it some balls is to swap a 3SGTE in there, but i would have no clue what to do with the AWD to convert it to a FWD.

anyways my vote goes to the 4th gen v-tec lude. not the Si, get the v-tec ones, those will run high 14's stock, and alot less people will steal those since they're not GS-R's. everyone i know with GS-R's got their cars stolen. which mean i know 3 GS-R's that gotten stolen and just in my circle of friends.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
  #9  
Old 02-19-2005, 02:08 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: New car time, but which!?

I believe a 3S-GTE out of an MR2 would swap cleanly and easily into a FWD Celica, since it's the same thing except in the back of the car. If this is extremely stupid, please correct me
  #10  
Old 02-19-2005, 02:40 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: New car time, but which!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kman10587
I believe a 3S-GTE out of an MR2 would swap cleanly and easily into a FWD Celica, since it's the same thing except in the back of the car. If this is extremely stupid, please correct me

maybe but i think it would be kinda tricky to get the shifter linkage to shift the right. i know thats why most speed shops in japan have such a hard timing swapping i na C30A from a NSX into a civic. and only signal auto has that swap completed, and they're hte only shop to do it, and how they did was a secret~
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
  #11  
Old 02-20-2005, 04:21 PM
JekylandHyde's Avatar
JekylandHyde JekylandHyde is offline
AF - Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: New car time, but which!?

There are many small differences between the Celica 3sgte and the MR2's 3SGTE, so I would not venture that swapping the MR2 motor into a Celica would be as easy as you might think.
__________________
Sponsorship: Amateur Motorsports <-- Get the book! - books are now available for shipment
  #12  
Old 02-21-2005, 08:50 PM
Dave1669 Dave1669 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Assuming you can find all of these cars for the price, my list goes as follows:

1. Honda Prelude Si VTEC- second fastest of the cars listed, great handling, reliable
2. Acura Integra GSR- almost as quick as the Prelude, easy to mod, reliable
3. Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX/GST- fastest of all these cars, easy to mod, tend to be unreliable
4. Honda Prelude Si- not as fast as the VTEC version
5. Acura Integra GS/LS- not as fast as the GSR Integra
6. Toyota Celica GT- good styling IMO, slower than the first 4 (maybe 5), reliable
7. Mitsubishi Eclipse RS/GS- probably the slowest car listed here, not as reliable as the Hondas and Toyota

Given this, you might have a hard time finding the first three in good condition for under 7000, but it can be done.
  #13  
Old 02-22-2005, 11:20 AM
mason_RsX's Avatar
mason_RsX mason_RsX is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to mason_RsX
I agree with dave's list except I prefer the Integra to the Lude...the celica will bore you, I think the eclipse may frustrate you...I personally think the integra looks better, and driving its successor I know the fit finish and quality for the price you pay

then again I have never driven a prelude
__________________


2002 Acura RSX Type-S

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiGNAL748
I have an outrageously large penis.
  #14  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:59 PM
Savior1974's Avatar
Savior1974 Savior1974 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 522
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: New car time, but which!?

what about a supra, comes with all the options that you "dream about". You can look at Turbo MKIII or Non Turbo MKIV's. Turbo MKIV's can be a little pricey.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX (Sold)

Act 2600, Apexi 3" downpipe, 3" exhaust, Hks 3"-5" muffler, Greddy TypeS BOV, Autometer Boost/Vac & Air fuel Gauge, Garrett T3/T4 60-1 turbo (Only boosting 15 psi) Tial 38mm Wastegate, Spearco FMIC, Greedy Profec B2, HKS Turbo Timer Type, Dejon Intake/K&N Air Filter, DSMLink, Eprom ECU, 950cc Fuel Injectors, Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump, Aeromotive FPR, Drilled/Slotted Rotors, B&M Short Shifter
  #15  
Old 02-22-2005, 03:13 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: New car time, but which!?

3rd gen. Supras have horribly problematic engines, and the 4th gens. are way overpriced - you'd be lucky to find even an N/A for less than $10,000. The 300ZX N/A from 1990 to 1996 is a much better buy right now.
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts