|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which and Why | |||
| Toyota Celica GT 94-99 |
|
2 | 11.76% |
| Honda Prelude si/vtec 93+ |
|
8 | 47.06% |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse 95-99 |
|
3 | 17.65% |
| Acura Integra 94+ |
|
4 | 23.53% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So in May I will be buying a new car with about 6-7k to use. It will be my 17th birthday so insurance on these is an issue as well. Currently I have been driving a 94 corolla for a while, and while it's a blast to drive *hah* I think it's finally time to get something new. I don't need a power plant of a car but I would like something with a little pep. So far the cars that interest me seem to be:
Toyota Celica GT 94-99 Honda Prelude si/vtec 93+ Mitsubishi Eclipse 95-99 Acura Integra 94+ Now I know this list might seem a little *ricer* to some of yall but that's hardly my intent. I like keeping a car nice and clean looking, nothing flashy and all. Reliability would also be a concern of mine, as I don't want to be stranded all the time. Must also be 90+ because of airbags. Are there one of these cars on the list that stand out to you for a certain reason? Or a car that you think would be suited for me that I haven't listed. The *dream* items of mine would be a manual, rwd, t-top. But usually that combo does not come with a good price or reliability. Thanks for reading |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
I'm going with the Celica, but no real good reason. I do like the way that they look, but don't know performance stats on them. You are aware that none of the cars on the list are rwd or have t-tops, right? Since you're young I think it would be best if you stayed with fwd, at least until you get some more experience, you'll be less likely to crash it.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
Yes I do know, that's why I put it with the *dream*. Thanks for the input.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
The Integra and the Prelude are the best cars on that list, but the most expensive. The Celica is extremely reliable and pretty cheap, but the performance is the lowest of the bunch. The Eclipse has decent performance and a low price, but the reliability is kinda shady. My pick would be a nice Integra GS-R, but if you don't have the funds for that, go with the Celica.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
Quote:
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo ![]() Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
Yeah, you can get RWD, manual, and T-Tops pretty cheaply. The 300ZX comes with T-Tops, and I believe the V6 Camaro and Firebird come with them as well; if not, you can get the 93-97 LT1 models for well under 10 grand, and those come with them.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
It is very rare to find a Z32 w/o T-Tops...a local guy here has one and I knew Ash Powers...he had one too...but he's now up at Z1 Motorsports in GA.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would never pick the celica over any of those cars. that engine only has 140hp from a camry 4 banger. the hottest celica could only run a 16.5 stock and 0-60 in the 8's. i doubt you can find performance parts for that engine. finding it is like finding performance parts for a 4 banger camry. the only way i think you can give it some balls is to swap a 3SGTE in there, but i would have no clue what to do with the AWD to convert it to a FWD.
anyways my vote goes to the 4th gen v-tec lude. not the Si, get the v-tec ones, those will run high 14's stock, and alot less people will steal those since they're not GS-R's. everyone i know with GS-R's got their cars stolen. which mean i know 3 GS-R's that gotten stolen and just in my circle of friends.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
I believe a 3S-GTE out of an MR2 would swap cleanly and easily into a FWD Celica, since it's the same thing except in the back of the car. If this is extremely stupid, please correct me
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: New car time, but which!?
Quote:
maybe but i think it would be kinda tricky to get the shifter linkage to shift the right. i know thats why most speed shops in japan have such a hard timing swapping i na C30A from a NSX into a civic. and only signal auto has that swap completed, and they're hte only shop to do it, and how they did was a secret~
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
There are many small differences between the Celica 3sgte and the MR2's 3SGTE, so I would not venture that swapping the MR2 motor into a Celica would be as easy as you might think.
__________________
Sponsorship: Amateur Motorsports <-- Get the book! - books are now available for shipment |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Assuming you can find all of these cars for the price, my list goes as follows:
1. Honda Prelude Si VTEC- second fastest of the cars listed, great handling, reliable 2. Acura Integra GSR- almost as quick as the Prelude, easy to mod, reliable 3. Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX/GST- fastest of all these cars, easy to mod, tend to be unreliable 4. Honda Prelude Si- not as fast as the VTEC version 5. Acura Integra GS/LS- not as fast as the GSR Integra 6. Toyota Celica GT- good styling IMO, slower than the first 4 (maybe 5), reliable 7. Mitsubishi Eclipse RS/GS- probably the slowest car listed here, not as reliable as the Hondas and Toyota Given this, you might have a hard time finding the first three in good condition for under 7000, but it can be done. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with dave's list except I prefer the Integra to the Lude...the celica will bore you, I think the eclipse may frustrate you...I personally think the integra looks better, and driving its successor I know the fit finish and quality for the price you pay
then again I have never driven a prelude
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
what about a supra, comes with all the options that you "dream about". You can look at Turbo MKIII or Non Turbo MKIV's. Turbo MKIV's can be a little pricey.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX (Sold) ![]() Act 2600, Apexi 3" downpipe, 3" exhaust, Hks 3"-5" muffler, Greddy TypeS BOV, Autometer Boost/Vac & Air fuel Gauge, Garrett T3/T4 60-1 turbo (Only boosting 15 psi) Tial 38mm Wastegate, Spearco FMIC, Greedy Profec B2, HKS Turbo Timer Type, Dejon Intake/K&N Air Filter, DSMLink, Eprom ECU, 950cc Fuel Injectors, Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump, Aeromotive FPR, Drilled/Slotted Rotors, B&M Short Shifter |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New car time, but which!?
3rd gen. Supras have horribly problematic engines, and the 4th gens. are way overpriced - you'd be lucky to find even an N/A for less than $10,000. The 300ZX N/A from 1990 to 1996 is a much better buy right now.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|