2001-2004 Impalas - The Good, Bad or Ugly

[the_bob]

Looking at a few in that year range.

Anything to look for with these cars?

Any warning signs?

Are they worth it?

[Pat_OD]

yea its worth it if u have one hell of a deep pocket :/ But seriously if i could do it again i wouldnt have wasted my money on such a crap ass car.

[victimizati0n]

Originally Posted by Pat_OD

yea its worth it if u have one hell of a deep pocket :/ But seriously if i could do it again i wouldnt have wasted my money on such a crap ass car.

Im the total opposite.

I have NEVER had a problem with my impala that has costed me any money.

The only thing that costs money are the monthly payments, and the gas.

I would say get one, they are nice cars, and are REALLY comftorable (we went on a 3 hour trip, and when we got out, i didnt feel that wierd "i cant walk" feeling you get in a cheaper car.

[ironmonkeygf]

I love mine. I haven't had my car very long, but I love it. It's very roomy (I'm 6'2, so that's saying a lot) and extremely comfortable. I haven't had any problems in the three weeks I've had it,but I know that's not saying much. However, my cousin had the same car I just got (01 LS), and he didn't have any problems for the three years he had it, and that's why I got this car. Then he traded it in for a Trailblazer and has regretted it ever since.

[MCO_Death]

Originally Posted by victimizati0n

Im the total opposite.

I have NEVER had a problem with my impala that has costed me any money.

The only thing that costs money are the monthly payments, and the gas.

I would say get one, they are nice cars, and are REALLY comftorable (we went on a 3 hour trip, and when we got out, i didnt feel that wierd "i cant walk" feeling you get in a cheaper car.

What he said basically for both Impalas I own. (2000 9C1 with 154k miles, 2003 LS with 35k miles)