|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gross or net?
I've been doing some reading on the camaro and the changes in its 35 year history. One thing puzzles me though, Are the power ratings taken at the wheels or at the crank? If they are taken at the wheels, how much do the 4th gen LT1 and LS1 cars have at the wheels? And how wide are the rear wheels? Thanks in advance!
__________________
1995 3000GT VR-4 Installed: ESP front precat eliminating downpipe, test pipe, RF-1008 K&N, Dejon tool Y pipe, 1G DSM BOV, MSD wires, Guted rear pre cat, ISSPRO EV Marine boost gauge, IPO MBC, EGR blockoffs, Palm m515 dataloger setup, NGK iridium plugs, SPEC stage II clutch 500ft/lb, 5300k HID plug and play setup. Soon:Topline Engineering ground wires. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm pretty sure they're all taken at the crank...that's why when dyno'ed, they put out less hp due to power loss through the drivetrain.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
The power rating of engines is based on flywheel power and almost every car has different drivetrain loss so it would depend on what the power to the wheels is but most Manuals lose 10-15 percent threw drivetrain and most auto's lose 20-25 percent which is a huge improvment tho. Some auto cars years ago were found to be losing as much as 40 percent threw drivetrain. Prior to 71 I think it was they measured horsepower slightly different. It was still measured at the flywheel but they measure the power without accessorys or full exhaust. So not only were you losing power from drivetrain but you were losing power to back pressure and sparstic power accessory lose at well.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
I do believe the LS1s were underrated, I hear lots of reports of stock LS1 Camaros and Firebirds dynoing near or even slightly above 300 to the wheels when they're supposedly 310-315 at the crank. As for raer wheels... um, stock I think around 8 inches? give or take 1/2 inch, my rims are off an LT1 z28 and I run 245's.
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later. 194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies 179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ ON ITS WAY: MORE R.I.P. Andy 87 Benz 190e - DD 01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
Interesting, are all 4th gen Camaros DOHC?
Damn, only 8"? Must be easy to loose traction in first and second, if your launching do you have to lay off the gas to keep from spinning?
__________________
1995 3000GT VR-4 Installed: ESP front precat eliminating downpipe, test pipe, RF-1008 K&N, Dejon tool Y pipe, 1G DSM BOV, MSD wires, Guted rear pre cat, ISSPRO EV Marine boost gauge, IPO MBC, EGR blockoffs, Palm m515 dataloger setup, NGK iridium plugs, SPEC stage II clutch 500ft/lb, 5300k HID plug and play setup. Soon:Topline Engineering ground wires. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Gross or net?
Quote:
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Gross or net?
Quote:
True i mean i just dynoed yesterday and i posted it. U can see i made a hair over 300hp at the wheels. Yea and i don't ever remember a camro being DOHC. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
No DOHC camaros that I know of, and also the traction thing depends bigtime on your tires. My old ones i could stomp on it and go, the ones i have now i gotta start lightly otherwise they (well, it lol) just spin(s). I have a 3.8 but still.
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later. 194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies 179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ ON ITS WAY: MORE R.I.P. Andy 87 Benz 190e - DD 01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
I heard that 93 z28's were rated at the wheels officially, but I havn't heard anything else.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() www.Xenostalgia.com Exit your Reality || 97 Acura Integra GS 2DR |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Gross or net?
I'm almost 100% sure that Camaros never came with DOHC engines. Camaros and Firebirds come with pushrod engines. I've always been proud of that considering how many foreign companies don't use pushrod engines.
__________________
1994 Camaro V6 A4 - RIP 3/1/06 ![]() http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/805164 1994 Camaro Z28 A4 - Bought 4/6/06 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Gross or net?
Quote:
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart. Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear) |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Gross or net?
Quote:
Not saying for a fact Just what I heard. And now you told me otherwise. *claps* See? Don't jump the gun on bombing people. Mr LT1 :P
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() www.Xenostalgia.com Exit your Reality || 97 Acura Integra GS 2DR |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
He didn't get mad he simply was stating what he knows. "No car in US history was listed with rated wheel horsepower that I have ever heard of " See. He is simply stating the facts he didn't try to jump u for not knowing.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
a lot of manufacturers underrate the power ratings on some of their more performance oriented cars for insurance reasons. in japan, you cant find a car rated with more than 275 horsepower cause of a gentleman's agreement between manufacturers. ofcourse many of the cars have more but the are underrated.
__________________
*Better power-to-weight ratio than a C6 corvette* |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gross or net?
They actualy recently lifted that.
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later. 194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies 179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ ON ITS WAY: MORE R.I.P. Andy 87 Benz 190e - DD 01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|