-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-07-2005, 12:37 AM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

When the SRT-4 came out in 2003, it was the undisputed king of cheap speed. Sub-14 second quarter mile times and 66 mph+ slalom speeds for $20,000? No one stood a chance. Now, it's 2005, and Ford has finally re-designed the Mustang, giving it even better acceleration and infinitely better handling. Quarter mile times for the 2005 Mustang GT have gone as low as 13.6, and it's only been out for a month; low 13's are definitely conceivable. Some would also argue that the Mustang GT outhandles the SRT-4. Although it doesn't generate quite as much grip, rear-wheel-drive is fundamentally better than front-wheel-drive, and the Mustang GT has bigger, wider wheels and tires. The GT is also a more comfortable daily driver, at least for two people. The ride is noticeably softer and smoother, and the engine is more relaxed and subdued. Feature content on the Mustang is better as well, offering such options as power driver and passenger seats, a six-disc CD changer, and a 1000-watt stereo system.

I believe that the Mustang GT is the new king of bang-for-buck. For $4000 more, you get a car that rides better, goes faster, and doesn't look like a riced-out economy car. And when the Mustang SVT Cobra comes out next year, it should raise the Mustang to a level of performance that it has surely never seen before outside of the race track.

Discuss
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2005, 12:47 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

I would definitely take a GT over a SRT4 anyday...RWD, NA reliability, just as easy to mod, I would venture to say better aftermarket....you'll see...give it time
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:00 AM
CanucksRT CanucksRT is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not a big Mustang fan, but that power for that price, I'd take the mustang.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:19 AM
Zwrangler's Avatar
Zwrangler Zwrangler is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 684
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WHAT???? A mustang GT is $24,000 in the U.S. ??????? bastards! over here in the Emirates the car dealers are selling them for over $37,500 coz they're like the new toy out on the market.

Damn it, i wish i c9ould get a new stang, definitely better looking than an SRT4. Only problem for me with the new stangs is they're sooooo wide like driving a ship not a sports car, but i can get over it
__________________

93 camaro Z28 R.I.P.
From this......................to this and this

check it out at my website

"Pain heals, chicks dig scars but glory is forever !"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2005, 09:39 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

Yea the GT Mustangs are going from 24-25 here...but you know...you could talk them down a bit too
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2005, 09:46 AM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

If I had to choose between the two, I would surely take the Mustang GT. Still I believe the SRT-4 is a better bang for the buck. I'm not sold on the Mustang being to outhandle the SRT-4, and I believe that the SRT-4 has the better brakes. Like I said though, I still take the Mustang GT in a heartbeat, I'd be willing to pay an extra $4,000.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2005, 10:04 AM
WickedNYCowboy's Avatar
WickedNYCowboy WickedNYCowboy is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,477
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WickedNYCowboy Send a message via Yahoo to WickedNYCowboy
I'd take the Mustang. Personally I feel RWD cars handle better. I feel you can control the back end better then with a FWD. That is one of the major things I hate about my ride it being FWD.
__________________
Evan
Support your local volunteer fire department
===============
My Rides:
2003 Ford F-350 Long Horn Hauler
Others:
1999 Toyota Camry LE V6-Dad
2004 Chevy Tahoe Z71-Sister
2004 Toyota Camry LE V6-Mom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:03 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

Quote:
I'd take the Mustang. Personally I feel RWD cars handle better. I feel you can control the back end better then with a FWD. That is one of the major things I hate about my ride it being FWD.
That's true, but on certain roads, the SRT-4 is gonna be easier to control anyways, due to its IRS.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:59 PM
publicenemy137's Avatar
publicenemy137 publicenemy137 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to publicenemy137
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

I'd take the stang anyday over some ugly looking neon
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:00 PM
panchoman's Avatar
panchoman panchoman is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to panchoman Send a message via MSN to panchoman Send a message via Yahoo to panchoman
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

Mustang Definatley, i have a cousin with an SRT-4 he's done a lot of things to it and it is pretty fast and everything, but when he first got it, i felt it was over rated, and ive never driven in that new GT but everyone says it what they say it is
__________________


"Hasta la victoria siempre!"-Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:02 PM
Muscletang's Avatar
Muscletang Muscletang is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Reasons why I'd take the Mustang over the SRT-4:

1. more horsepower and torque
2. better 1/4 mile and 0-60 times
3. SRT-4's looks aren't close to the Mustang's
4. better aftermarket for the Mustang
5. SRT-4 comes with a turbo and that makes me edgy
6. IT'S A FREAKIN 2005 MUSTANG!
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him.......

silly rabbit, tricks are for kids...

I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lars Ulrich
What?! Record sales are slumping? Must be from all those pirates. Can't be because we started sucking 10 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:02 PM
M3FordBoy's Avatar
M3FordBoy M3FordBoy is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 439
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

^Number 6 was a good point . I would have to agree with him on all of them except for 5 turbo doesn't bother me. I pick the Mustang.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:41 PM
syr74 syr74 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: The new king of bang-for-buck: Mustang GT vs. SRT-4

I cannot believe anybody is even arguing wether the Mustang GT handles better than the SRT4. Car and Driver got the Mustang within a whisker of base 350Z slalom times, and the GT turned in a better skidpad performance than the base Z! All this on the 17" all season tire/wheel package as the 18"s have yet to arrive!

Autoweek recently named the Mustang GT the winner in a comparo with the 05 GTO largely because the Mustang handles so well! Their words folks, not just mine. The only reason we are even having this discussion is because there is a live-axle under the pony's rear end. If somebody asked the same question but used a GTO or 350Z instead of the Mustang GT they would be laughed off the forum.

Say what you will about live-axles, a whole lot of IRS cars are going to be getting a full-on view of tri-bar tailights for years to come wether in a straight line or on the twisties.

Acceleration is simply no contest as the V-8 pony has turned a 13.5 at 103mph in the hands of Motor Trend testers, and the best verified bone stock time by a private owner is a 13.35 sec. e.t. bone stock thus far. SRT4's are fast stock, but they aren't that fast. The SRT4 is a good deal for the money, but the Mustang GT has it covered pretty convinicingly even at 4 grand more.

Also, good luck getting an 05 Mustang GT for less than 24k. Base price for the car is $25,2xx.00, and right now the average life expectancy of a GT on a dealer's lot is under 2 hours. These suckers go for sticker or very close to it simply because demand is enormous.

The Mustang GT is the reigning king of bang-for-the-buck, and likely will be for some time to come.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:59 PM
Muscletang's Avatar
Muscletang Muscletang is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3FordBoy
^Number 6 was a good point . I would have to agree with him on all of them except for 5 turbo doesn't bother me. I pick the Mustang.
Turbo really doesn't bother me either, but my friends and family have had turbo cars that didn't do to well. When the turbo is running it's awesome and is fun to drive, but when it's broke, which seems to be too often, it's a pain.
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him.......

silly rabbit, tricks are for kids...

I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lars Ulrich
What?! Record sales are slumping? Must be from all those pirates. Can't be because we started sucking 10 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-07-2005, 04:24 PM
3000ways 3000ways is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Mustang handles so well, in comparison with what? A GTO which weighs 3800Lbs? Wow. Don't get me wrong, the 2005 Mustang GT, is a step above the previous generation, but it still has a long way to go before it claim to up there with other performance vehicles. The SRT-4 is a car that I must admit I have underestimated, I don't think it's really an awesome handling car, but I don't think this about the Mustang GT either.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts