|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: honda del sol vtec vs. '95 mr2 turbo | |||
| honda |
|
2 | 28.57% |
| toyota |
|
5 | 71.43% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: somewhere, North Carolina
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sup Thugs. Hmm... i've been wondering for the longest time about these two cars. Who do you think would win between a 1995 HOnda del sol vtec and a 1995 mr2 turbo. I've raced one and totally killed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 1995 Honda del sol vtec vs. 1995 Mr2 turbo
my b16a2 del sol used to knock the socks off of mr2's with aftermarket setups. given, the mr2's had a lotta custom body work=bondo. IMO the del sol will win everytime. same with the other toyota sports car they discontinued this year, the celica GTS.
__________________
![]() www.cardomain.com/id/bingissd http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2660831#post2660831 <MEET IN DAYGO |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
1993 was the last year for the MR2 Turbo in the US.
__________________
Best GT-S STOCK times: 1/4: 14.788 @ 94.98mph 1/8: 9.640 @ 75.87mph Best Alltrac times: 1/4: 13.3 @ 102mph (older setup) 1/8th: 7.8 @ 83mph (old setup)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 352
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think a 1993 mr2 turbo would win.(There is no 1995 in US)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 1995 Honda del sol vtec vs. 1995 Mr2 turbo
i remember reading that a mr2 turbo has a 0-60 of nearly a half second quicker than del sol vtec's, but i must admit my del sol vtec never lost to any of the super (clean looking) mr2's. there was a guy at my college who had a turbo mr2 with a 300zx front end and some more custom body work done to it, and my nearly stock b16 del sol beat him every time. maybe his bondo weighed him down too much cause he was built for show purposes mostly
__________________
![]() www.cardomain.com/id/bingissd http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2660831#post2660831 <MEET IN DAYGO |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
AF - Advisor
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 1995 Honda del sol vtec vs. 1995 Mr2 turbo
Quote:
6.1 sec = Turbo MR2s 0-60 8.X sec = Non-Turbo MR2's 0-60 Quote:
As for the MR2 VS Del Sol, the turbo MR2 should win every time. You are comparing mid-engine rear-wheel drive which is optimal for launching compared to front-engine FWD which is the worse case for launching ~ that is simple physics. The turbo MR2 has more power. The only benefit the Del Sol has is weight. It's a lighter car. Not trying to troll your forum, just trying to give honest facts.
__________________
Sponsorship: Amateur Motorsports <-- Get the book! - books are now available for shipment |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Van Nuys, California
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1995 Honda del sol vtec vs. 1995 Mr2 turbo
The del sol dones't stand a chance against the turbo mr2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Honda GODDESS/Global Mod
![]() |
Re: 1995 Honda del sol vtec vs. 1995 Mr2 turbo
now if you were to build a mid engine, rwd, turbo sol... would be a pretty good run for the money!
![]() Jekyl and Hyde... nice to see you around here... how are the cars doin? oh yeah... locked. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|