|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
My current project car has lost is fun factor and I am looking for something new to tune, I have a 93' MR-2 turbo which is going to get a 3.0 liter engine swaped into it if I decide to keep working on it. Im looking for a car that has unserpassed handling (and that is rwd) every time I say that people talk about me MR-2 and MR-S, I want to know which one is worth tunning out in the long run and which one of the two handles better when beign pushed hard (Im probably gonna get into road racing or auto X). please help and thnx ahead of time for any info
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: L.A. , California
Posts: 581
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the mr-s will probably out handle the mr2 turbo from what i ve seen. if you do get the mr2 turbo, try to get the 93-95 yr, the suspension was revised on those years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Regular
![]() |
Re: MR-2 vs MR-S (handling)
I think MR-S will be better...because they are being tune in torgue car in Japan and u do need quite and amazing handling to race in torgue...also is a new car so their technology would be newer
__________________
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: city, New York
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
the main reason why the mrs handles better is becasue of its lightness. the mr2 turbo are kinda porkish. but i doubt the suspension geometry is any different from the mr2
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: MR-2 vs MR-S (handling)
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: city, New York
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
the aftermarket for the mr-s is pretty bad. they do make supercharger and turbo kits for it still though.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: L.A. , California
Posts: 581
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: MR-2 vs MR-S (handling)
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
for the most part I found the parts I want on the MR-S is just that half of them are over sea....which I dont mind paying to get the parts here. I really just wanted to see what ppls opinion would be on the two cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|