-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:52 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Which one??????

Looking for a new car, but cant decide which one to get, it is between a 92-96 honda prelude, or a 91-98 nissan 200sx se-r, i am planning to turbocharge and most likely supercharge the car, and am looking for the one with the most power without engine swap, i am leaning toward the prelude, but any suggestions??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:03 PM
drdisque's Avatar
drdisque drdisque is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,476
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drdisque
Re: Which one??????

turbocharge and supercharge? why both? you realize thats largely pointless, right?

Not all '92-'96 preludes are the same, some come with very crappy engines and some have fairly good ones. If you're going to boost, I would get a Prelude Si with the H23
__________________
Dr. Disque -
Current cars:
2008 BMW 135i M-Sport
2011 Mazda2 Touring

Past cars:
2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT
1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:10 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i heard that turbocharging and supercharging would give it more power, but i guess i learn that that is wrong, also, i did some reasearch and the se-r does 140 stock and the si does 160 stock, but can any of you guess help figure out which one will end up with the most power once the turbo and everything is in?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2004, 06:30 AM
beyondloadedSE's Avatar
beyondloadedSE beyondloadedSE is offline
AF Ford Contour-Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Which one??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by soundagent 51
i heard that turbocharging and supercharging would give it more power, but i guess i learn that that is wrong, also, i did some reasearch and the se-r does 140 stock and the si does 160 stock, but can any of you guess help figure out which one will end up with the most power once the turbo and everything is in?
whats the displacement of the motors? what kind of turbo? what kind of supercharger? How much boost will you be running? Will you be running an intercooler? Do you even have the money to do this? All these things factor in how much hp the car will make?
__________________

"The CEG Nazi"
www.contour.org
1996 Ford Contour SE - Sold
3.0L V6 and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 16 psi and only 4,700 rpms.
1999 Tropic Green SVT Contour - Bone stock and MINT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2004, 07:33 AM
Reed Reed is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Reed
Re: Which one??????

well some 200sx's came with a sr20de which means you can swap in the sr20det or just get some machine work done to the sr20de block and get the sr20de head and all the stuff that goes with turbocharging. you could probably end up with the most power out of this platform as opposed to the honda motor. also look at the vehicle weights, its not all about HP. A lighter car will handle better, accelerate better, and break better.

oh yeah and the sr20 was pretty much designed for turbocharging (but there are some internal differences between the sr20de and the sr20det but i dont know what they are)
__________________
Cars are like music.
If it ain't fast it ain't shit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2004, 07:37 AM
Reed Reed is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Reed
Re: Which one??????

www.sr20deforum.com
__________________
Cars are like music.
If it ain't fast it ain't shit.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2004, 02:54 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i dont know what displacement, probably a turbonetics turbo kit, yes, i will be running a intercooler, and how much would it be for a engine swap to a sr20det or just to machine a sr20de? i still have alot of time to think about it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2004, 12:46 AM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Which one??????

a turbocharger is a supercharger. Its just exhaust driven. They do the same thing as each other, force air into the engine. Centrifugal superchargers and turbochargers are more efficient than roots type chargers. This means less intake temperature rise. Turbochargers are believed to be even more efficient because they theoretically do not rob power from the crankshaft. Some exhaust restriction is created though. I would recomment swapping the SR20DET. This way the engine is already turbocharged so you don't have to worry about internals, fuel system(for a little while), idle control stuff, timing maps, fuel maps, ect. If you turbocharge the existing engine, you will run into problems with the fuel and timing maps. Good luck.
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2004, 01:01 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so get the 200sx, swap the engines,and slap a turbo in there, ok thx.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2004, 08:43 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Which one??????

If you swap in the SR20DET, it already has a turbocharger.
SR=engine series
20=2.0l displacement
D=twin cam
E=electronic fuel injection
T=turbocharged.
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-18-2004, 09:02 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wouldnt a after market turbo on a sr20de be faster than a a sr20det?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-19-2004, 04:00 AM
drdisque's Avatar
drdisque drdisque is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,476
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drdisque
Re: Which one??????

nope, SR20DE has cast internals = low boost
__________________
Dr. Disque -
Current cars:
2008 BMW 135i M-Sport
2011 Mazda2 Touring

Past cars:
2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT
1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-19-2004, 11:30 AM
Reed Reed is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Reed
Re: Which one??????

might be faster till you detonate a piston or put one through the head. also the sr20det has oil squirters for the bottoms of the pistons whereas the sr20de does not, that is the machining that would need to be done (also maybe some clearancing for beefier rods i dont know)
__________________
Cars are like music.
If it ain't fast it ain't shit.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-19-2004, 03:08 PM
soundagent 51 soundagent 51 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
nice, how much do you think it would be to get the engine swap?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-19-2004, 07:41 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: Which one??????

It would probably do okay for low boost. The KA24E and KA24DE have cast pistons and have held 16psi. That was with AEM EMS but a lot of guys run 12psi everyday on the stock bottom end. IF you can tune it well, it should hold 5-7psi no problem. Correct AFs and timing are the most important factors in whether or not your engine is going to last under boost. Judging from the way you sound, you should probably just get the engine swap.
http://www.jgycustoms.com/motors.htm
__________________
-Cory

1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar
Stock internals. Daily driven.
12.6@122mph
496whp/436wtq at 25psi
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts