-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-12-2004, 10:50 PM
mustang67n's Avatar
mustang67n mustang67n is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ford 289 power

ok guys (and gals) i gots a ford 289 (not hi-po) in my 67 'stang. what is the cheapest way i can get at least 350 horsepower out of it while still keeping it fairly fuel efficient
__________________
I gots a '67 mustang that doesn't appreciate:
oversized wings
huge bumpers
fart can exhaust
neon lights
ugly painjobs
and kids that think their ricer goes fast because it has all of the above!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2004, 11:00 PM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: ford 289 power

cheapest would be nitrous and youd have exact same mileage during regular driving. what are they rated at stock? not sure if it could handle the shot needed to get to 350 without work but never read up on teh 289.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2004, 11:42 PM
mustang67n's Avatar
mustang67n mustang67n is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
about 200 horsies but i want the 350 without nos or super/turbocharger
__________________
I gots a '67 mustang that doesn't appreciate:
oversized wings
huge bumpers
fart can exhaust
neon lights
ugly painjobs
and kids that think their ricer goes fast because it has all of the above!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2004, 11:49 PM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: ford 289 power

bump the compression, some headwork, wild cam and a monster carb, headers and a nice free flowing exhaust. sure theres other little details youd need to do also.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2004, 09:20 AM
MrPbody MrPbody is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: ford 289 power

Tall order for a small engine. While doable, it certainly won't be tame or "easy" on gas. I would suggest a stroker kit to make it a 332 CID. Eagle makes a great kit to do this. The 289 and 302 blocks are virtually identical, so all the stuff that fits a 302, will fit the 289. The 289 heads may have too small a chamber for pump gas.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2004, 02:22 AM
benchtest benchtest is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: ford 289 power

You're going to need more airflow than your stock heads have to achieve 350 horsepower. Torque is what you need anyway, if you want mileage. I'd suggest you put your 289 in the garage and save it for the day you want to restore your car. In the mean time, find a late model, or early, 302. Next, I'd get a set of canfield heads. I don't work for them or have any relation, but they were the best performing out-of-the-box head I've seen. This was verified on my Superflow SF-300. (Running 10.60 e.t. in 2700lb, 347 c.i. 88 'stang with 1.94 valves. No porting, just cleaned-up bowls.) Next, contact a cam company directly and tell them what you have and they will recommend a cam, lifters, etc. You can run whatever compression you can afford. Put on a good intake, carb., headers and you're ready to have a good time. [Paint the heads blue and tell everyone it's a 289.] Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:55 PM
stanger42's Avatar
stanger42 stanger42 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to stanger42 Send a message via Yahoo to stanger42
Re: Re: ford 289 power

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPbody
Tall order for a small engine. While doable, it certainly won't be tame or "easy" on gas. I would suggest a stroker kit to make it a 332 CID. Eagle makes a great kit to do this. The 289 and 302 blocks are virtually identical, so all the stuff that fits a 302, will fit the 289. The 289 heads may have too small a chamber for pump gas.

actually they ARE identical. the only difference between the two is the stroke.

stock 67 c-code 289 is rated at 225 hp (under ideal conditions) so really you're only looking to add about 120 hp or so. start with a 4 barrel carb, performance intake, headers (or hi-po manifolds from a k-code 289), dual exhaust. You won't start to see any major hp gains unless you get into the internals. You'll want to swap the heads, put in a slightly more aggressive cam, stroke it, bore it. Your car's potential is tied directly into your bank account.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts