-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-11-2004, 03:03 PM
68muscle 68muscle is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 68muscle Send a message via Yahoo to 68muscle
'95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

I bought my daughter a '68 Firebird with no engine or trans. I also bought a 3.4 liter V-6 and automatic transmission out of a totalled '95 Camaro. I know it sounds a little goofy, but she doesn't need 300 hp or 10 mpg. I am planning on keeping the car forever, so value isn't important to me. I can always drop a 350 in it later when she gets tired of the car and wants something more high tech.

Has anybody done a modern engine installation in one of these old cars? The engine has the computer still attached, and I also have the shifter mechanism. I also have the engine mounts and driveshaft yoke.

What are the steps needed to do this install? Can it be done without a professional mechanic getting invloved?

TIA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2004, 05:39 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

I don't think anyone in the history of car's has put the 3.4 in a classic F-body but I can understand what your thinkinh behind it is but for the love of god replace it with a 350 soon. Also welcome to the Forum Tia.
John
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2004, 10:49 PM
99onI95's Avatar
99onI95 99onI95 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 96 convertible firebird I converted to a 2000 TA convertible with the 3.4 V6. I know your not looking for performance but the 3.4 stinks when pulling out into traffic. I'm guessing the 68 is heavier than a 96 so that doesn't help much either. I had a 69 350 in a XJ6 Jaguar that would barely bark the tires with intake, roller rockers, carburetor, shift kit and other goodies. It also got 20 mpg's. Had a lot to do with the Jaguar's ratio I'm sure. Because top speed was unbelievable.

Why not throw an old 350 in with a 700R4. Great gas mileage and not very powerful if left stock. Besides the 3.4 has a bad history of giving up after 100K.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2004, 11:25 PM
CreepingDeath94 CreepingDeath94 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 825
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
He already has the 3.4 though. Youre also going to need to switch the fuel pump over to an electric one for the fuel injectors. This project can be done without a professional mechanic if you have a firm electrical background I should think...and patience.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2004, 06:39 PM
KaotiKCamaro5's Avatar
KaotiKCamaro5 KaotiKCamaro5 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KaotiKCamaro5
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

whats the deal with knockin on the 3.4?? i have a 93 Camaro with the 3.4 and with a little bitof money you can make it run pretty strong.. i've ripped a few 3rd gen firebirds and camaros with 305s and im not even into the engine yet.. if you know what you're doing the 3.4 can be a great engine to work with.. but never would i even think to put it into a first gen Bird...
__________________

"doing that is like trying to sell porn to a 6 year old..... It's just wrong" - hypsi87

LE123456712: i promise i will stop filling your email with my boobs
Kieft125: lol.. good, its starting to get rediculous..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2004, 03:58 AM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

I wouldn't recommend a 305 TBi for it either but I wasn't knocking the 3.4. I said I understand his reasoning behind it but I think even you can agree if you where picking a powertrain for a muscle car the 3.4 wouldn't be your first choice even though its a good compromise of power/ecomony it doesn't offer the possibility's the 350 does.
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2004, 10:39 AM
KaotiKCamaro5's Avatar
KaotiKCamaro5 KaotiKCamaro5 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KaotiKCamaro5
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

if i was picking a powertrain for a muscle car i wouldnt look any farther than the LT1..
__________________

"doing that is like trying to sell porn to a 6 year old..... It's just wrong" - hypsi87

LE123456712: i promise i will stop filling your email with my boobs
Kieft125: lol.. good, its starting to get rediculous..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2004, 05:01 PM
dampachi's Avatar
dampachi dampachi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dampachi Send a message via MSN to dampachi Send a message via Yahoo to dampachi
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

KaotikCamaro5...they don't want power. It's for a girl. Why don't you just get a carb'd 305? Or whatever that 6 cylinder was they put in novas/camaros/firebirds.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2004, 05:21 PM
KaotiKCamaro5's Avatar
KaotiKCamaro5 KaotiKCamaro5 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KaotiKCamaro5
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

i know.. and apparently i didnt want power either when i bought my car.. lol..
__________________

"doing that is like trying to sell porn to a 6 year old..... It's just wrong" - hypsi87

LE123456712: i promise i will stop filling your email with my boobs
Kieft125: lol.. good, its starting to get rediculous..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-22-2004, 01:36 AM
hotrod_chevyz's Avatar
hotrod_chevyz hotrod_chevyz is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

step 1:custom engine mounts and redrilling the holes where the transmission crossmember relates to the tranny mount.(ie match up bolt holes(novice)
step 2:custom driveshaft(professional)
step 3:cutting hole for computer wiring harness(hole thru the firewall) (novice).
step 4: wiring it up(i see a later model steering column,and a later model fuse box a requirement for this project(a little know-how)

step 3:Hanging the complete wiring harness and other engine related electrical and emission devices(novice)
step 4:exhaust.Ithink you might run into trouble with the original y-pipe clearing the front end where the engine mounts bolt.this is part of the project i would leave it up to a local professional exhaust company(professional)
Oher things: some if not all safety features may have to be bypassed,such as neutral safetys,and other shift related safety features.besides that the cars dont weigh that much different so you should get just about the same performance out if it in the 68' as you did in the 95'.But the weight of the engine is a factor and you may have to switch to a stiffer set of shocks,and it will sit higher in the front,you may have to get it back level with higher capacity rear springs,or air shocks.other than that i can think of several things that would have to be mounted up like the air cleaner housing and things of that sort.
Its not impossible.heck i dont even think you will need a hammer and a welder for this project.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-22-2004, 01:43 AM
hotrod_chevyz's Avatar
hotrod_chevyz hotrod_chevyz is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: '95 3.4 liter V-6 in a '68 F-body?

You will have to buy and install a after market electric fuel pump, and if it were mine i would buy a fuel cell,cause an old rusted tank is not the thing to be hooking to that 3.4.Those little injectors are sensitive to dirty fuel.So are electric fuel pumps.Oh yeah and a in-line fuel filter too...if i missed anything sombody please point it out
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-22-2004, 06:21 PM
tacoma man.'s Avatar
tacoma man. tacoma man. is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,230
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to tacoma man.
you mean the 250 six cyclinder, id say they are hard to find
__________________
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts