|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
just wondering what you guys would get. the eclipse has 75k miles with a lot of mods, selling for 10k. like t3/t4 turbo, fmic, 550cc injectors, shocks, brakes, viper alarm, electronic boost control, turbo timer. or a brand new srt-4? insurance is also higher on the srt-4.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
i would get the eclipse just solely based on looks. eclipse looks nice in my eyes but the SRT-4 just doesnt spark my interest. but the warranty and bran newness of the SRT-4 would also be real nice to have.
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
SRT4...the 2nd gen Eclipse AWD is heavier and not as good as the 1st gen AWD...
With the SRT4 you get the warranty, Mopar at your fingertips, and dont have to worry about DSM reliability that is like a monkey on your shoulder just waiting to bite you in your ear! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
Quote:
whats better in the 1g than the 2g besides weight? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
As long as you know how to work on one, go with the DSM. The SRT-4's front-wheel-drive really becomes a pain in the ass once you hit about 400 wheel horsepower.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
1g dsm = 14b turbo capable of putting dsm in the 11 second 1/4 mile
and also oil cooled instead of the 2g dsm which has a water cooled t25 turbo that would be luck to get a 13second car from because they do not hold boost at high rpm. 1g throttle body is 60mm compared to 52 or 54 mm 2g throttle body. intake mani on a 1g has larger ports and better flowing. 1g heads have larger ports intake and exhaust and slightly better cams. pre 92 engines had the 6 bolt flywheel that does not suffer from crankwalk like the later 7 bolt flywheel. also the 1g is way lighter. i had a 2g and the only thing they had on a 1g was a better exhaust manifold. the srt 4 has a bigger engine, fmic, and bigger turbo and is easy to upgrade because you just get stage upgrades from mopar. dodge was also pressed for time in development and ended up using high quality parts. if you can find a suspension and slicks to get it to hook to the ground i would take the srt 4 over a 2g dsm but not a 1g dsm awd. my meager .02 cents. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
the transmission has nothing to do with crankwalk, you just notice less 99's with crankwalk because less 99's were made than any other year
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
For the price its hard to beat the performance potential of an srt-4 out of the box. But you also have to sit down and ask yourself if you really want to drive a neon.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am quoting the FAQ from the eclipse/talon/laser forum. Personally I would go with the eclipse
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
eclipse gsx 1st gen
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 97 eclipse gsx or srt-4?
Eclipse! SRT-4 is not a bad choice either, but FWD vs. AWD, I'm always gonna pick AWD.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|