-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-23-2004, 01:59 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
carb opinion

Im lookin to buy a early 70's Blazer (yeah not a camaro, but im talkin engines here, which are pretty much the same for the two vehicles) and seeing as its already all mechanical, im starting to look at the idea of running a carb instead of EFI to keep from having to do all the custom wiring and such. Problem is, i dont know jack about carbs except for the extream basics. So im wondering, what do yall suggest as the best balanced carb, in regards to performance, economy (gas mileage), and hassle free operation. Im pretty much leaning towards a Quadrajet, but i dont know how Holley and Edelbrock stack up. Or perhaps some other brand i dont know about. Ive got the camaro, so this isnt really a high hp strip engine, but its more for low RPM high torque for towing and off roading, but ill still be driving it on the street putting some highway miles on it. the base for the engine is a 383cid SBC with Vortec heads, dual plane intake manifold, and a cam with somewhere around .430/.450in lift. im lookin to get a carb with between 600-750cfm. but with the quadrajet i could run an 800cfm without worry cuz of how they operate. im just doin some brainstormin here, and open to ideas and input.
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2004, 03:14 PM
DaMoNe6969's Avatar
DaMoNe6969 DaMoNe6969 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

Buy a carb, then throw it at someone you dont like..

Then buy yourself a TPI kit and do it the RIGHT WAY!

You said you wanted economy and hassle free operation... And if you know jack about carbs (as I do) than carb is not the way to go..
__________________
1991 Camaro Z28
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2004, 11:20 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

lol, yeah i know, and the TPI would give awesome low rpm torque, but i dunno, i dont like not knowing about carbs, so having one on the truck would give me the chance to learn. cuz im sure as shit not putting one on the camaro lol
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:30 AM
1992RS 1992RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,035
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 1992RS
Re: carb opinion

Not trying to call you our Iroc, but being the master sbc design guy you are, 383 for low end torque? Anyway, for that size of a motor just to feed it your going to have to get at least a 700cfm carb. I'd get the holley vaccum advance. But that's if you are dead set on getting a carb. Personaly I would go with TBI, it's more off road freindly than the TPI that you covit over. I think the holley commander 950 would be your best option, plus you can get em from 670 up to over 1000cfm. 950 is just the name. And with that there really isn't any costum wiring you have to worry about, cuz it's a stand alone system. well that's my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2004, 11:28 AM
tardster tardster is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 720
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Edelbrock is way to damn sensative man, I've got a Edelbrock 650 CFM on my maro and the thing sux bad. You can smell its running way to rich but if you lean it out it wont run, for 150 bucks I can get it set by a shop but hell man I kinda figured it woulda been set from the factory since it only ran me $300 bucks. If your going to go with a carn get you one of those race demon carbs, I've heard there pretty easy to adjust like holly but there kinda pricy
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-26-2004, 12:54 PM
Pewter'01SS's Avatar
Pewter'01SS Pewter'01SS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This depends on what you want out of it. I originally had a 650 Edelbrock on the S10. It was great as far as not having to keep re-adjusting it. The Edelbrock's are very similar to the Quadrajet in design. Once they are set, you really don't have to mess with them that much. Performance is a whole other issue. (Soooo going to get flamed for this...) For performance, Edlebrock's suck ass. I put a 750 Holley dual feed on my truck and it ran a HELL of a lot better, even though that was really way too much carb for the engine. BUT, they can be tempermental. If you're looking at price, you can get a rebuilt Holley for relativly cheap. The Demon carbs are the same setup as the Holley's but they are improved designs (same with the Edelbrock vs. Quadrajet). Personally, I'll only run a Holley.
__________________
R.I.P. Andy...It was an honor to have known you.



'01 Camaro SS - SLP Short Throw Shifter, Granatelli Air Lid, blue neon underbody kit

'92 Chevy 1/2 ton 4X4 - 350 w/ 190,000 miles and in desperate need of a rebuild.

'86 Chevy S10 - 350 w/ 400 Turbo trans, B&M Pro-Ratchet, 4.56 Posi, 350 is gone and slowly being replaced.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-26-2004, 07:44 PM
BrakeTorque's Avatar
BrakeTorque BrakeTorque is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would buy the 900 Holley, seen and heard nothing but good. And with you running that cam and a 383 then i wouldnt buy anything below a 750cfm.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-26-2004, 08:59 PM
1992RS 1992RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,035
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 1992RS
Re: carb opinion

oh, hat cam...you know that's a little piss ant cam for that 383 right? your gonna have a starving unhappy engine.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:38 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

lol, awww common 92RS, i need ya to work with me here, im not building hp. im building torque. the lift of the cam for a 383 can be very low, and make tons of torque so long as you have enough durration. and yes, 383's are known for their torque not their hp, its the long stroke and long connecting rods, taking advantage of the leverage principle.

i cite the GMPP HT 383, tested by CHP magazine, with 1-5/8in full length headers, very similar cam specs to what i have listed above (factory HT 383 cam), with a dual plane intake and carb, made 341hp@4700 and 447lbs/ft@3100 on 9.1:1 compression, vortec heads, 1.5:1 ratio rockers. and 650cfm carb.

http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...841/index.html

dunno if id call that starving boss and on the plus side, with that little cam, i should still be able to get decent cruizing mileage out of it. at least with the right cam. which is also why i was looking at the quadrajet with those tiny little primary bores.
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:40 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

oh sorry, that was with 1.6:1 ratio rocker arms. my mistake, but still, there is even more room there for improovement without messing with the main parts and have a bulletproof, high torque, good mileage engine just begging for a 4x4 to be wrapped up in
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-27-2004, 11:51 AM
1992RS 1992RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,035
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 1992RS
Re: carb opinion

well next time put the full cam specs on here then.. sheesh. If you have enough duration you'll be alright, but you didn't say that. And still 383's are known for midrange torque more than low end torque, but I guess 3100 is still kinda in the low end. Guess I'm just not used to building a mild engine. Oh speaking of offroad, you should see my buddies 283 he's got in an old CJ7, 400hp 400 and something fpt. It's wicked, he'll spin the motor 8000rpm all day with no problems. I want one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-27-2004, 10:34 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

lol, yeah i knew you were just in the wrong frame of mind, ill let that one slide without an i told ya so oh and your buddy realizes he has an 8000rpm engine, in a JEEP!!!! *shakes head slowly from side to side*
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-01-2004, 10:51 AM
1992RS 1992RS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,035
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to 1992RS
Re: carb opinion

I offered him 2 grand for the engine, he didn't want any part of it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-01-2004, 12:10 PM
Hypsi87's Avatar
Hypsi87 Hypsi87 is offline
I got your v-8 swingin!!!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,965
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Hypsi87
Re: carb opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by tardster
Edelbrock is way to damn sensative man, I've got a Edelbrock 650 CFM on my maro and the thing sux bad. You can smell its running way to rich but if you lean it out it wont run, for 150 bucks I can get it set by a shop but hell man I kinda figured it woulda been set from the factory since it only ran me $300 bucks. If your going to go with a carn get you one of those race demon carbs, I've heard there pretty easy to adjust like holly but there kinda pricy

Thats odd, when I was messin with the v-8's back in the day, I always found holly to be the touchy one.
__________________


Grand National. Going fast with class.
Voted FASTEST street car on AF.
Here is the proof!!!
1987 Buick Grand National.
Back in action!!!!
1999 Ford F-250
Tow rig from hell 598 Ft-lbs.
ASE Certified in...
Mobile AC
On Highway medium duty diesel engines.
Off highwayy medium duty diesel engines.
On highway trucks.
Working on the eletronics certification

Member of
A.A.N.B.C- Afer against non boosted crews #2
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-02-2004, 02:24 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: carb opinion

well, ive heard bad about both edelbrock and holly, anyone got negative feedback on Q-jets?
__________________


Chevrolet Camaro - I enjoy beating the hell out of people

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=68052
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts