-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-18-2004, 07:45 PM
mayer mayer is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
RSX Type-S VS 350Z

easy question: which would u prefer??
is the 350 much faster?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2004, 07:52 PM
Neutrino's Avatar
Neutrino Neutrino is offline
Yaya Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayer
easy question: which would u prefer??
is the 350 much faster?

350Z without a doubt. Unless you need more trunk space and a back seat. And yes the 350Z is significantly faster.
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2004, 07:53 PM
MexSiR's Avatar
MexSiR MexSiR is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MexSiR
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Ummm. I think there is no real comparison among these cars. The 350Z will outperform the RSX in every category.

350Z -
0-60mph 5.4
1/4 mile 14.2

RSX-S -
0-60mph 6.3
1/4 mile 14.9

That is just acceleration which doesent mean that much, the 350Z is rear wheel and the RSX front wheel.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR
Im not as fast as I am furious.
1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel)
Porsche RS America
BMW 323 01
Pictures of my ride (Pictures)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2004, 09:25 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Yeah, the 350Z will light up the RSX-S in almost any performance category.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2004, 10:07 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
why do all of the sudden people think RSX's are fast?
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2004, 10:11 PM
Andydg Andydg is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Quote:
Originally Posted by TatII
why do all of the sudden people think RSX's are fast?
It's 'cause of the V-TEC man!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2004, 12:17 AM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Probably from something in the latest issue of one of the tuner mags.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2004, 04:26 PM
RSX04TS RSX04TS is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

It all depends on the driver, besides there are more upgrades for the rsx then the 350z, plus the 350 z is rwd, it's harder to control so you tend to slip, as for the rsx the fwd has better traction, so less time is reduced, but it all comes down to the driver
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2004, 04:31 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

The 350Z doesn't tend to slip at all unless you're in shitty weather. The 350Z has much more power, and you don't have to wait until 6000 rpm to get the brunt of it. It has better weight distribution, it gets better traction on launches, and it has better brakes and tires. I can see from your name that you're biased towards the RSX, but compared to the Z, it's just inferior.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2004, 05:45 PM
bizlipkick bizlipkick is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bizlipkick
own type S- drove 350 Z . 350 is faster- acura is put together allot better
__________________
---
My Car domain Page http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/710825
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-19-2004, 05:56 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Yeah, I'll agree that the RSX is more solidly built and a much smoother ride.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-19-2004, 06:02 PM
Andydg Andydg is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

The RSX's 0-60 and quarter mile time: 6.1 14.8
And now the 350Z's 0-60 and quarter mile time: 5.4 13.6
So yes the 350Z is faster.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-19-2004, 07:44 PM
3kgt8's Avatar
3kgt8 3kgt8 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

13.6 is that right??????
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-19-2004, 07:51 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Sounds a bit low, but I guess it's possible. Motor Trend got a 13.7.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-19-2004, 08:45 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Quote:
Originally Posted by RSX04TS
It all depends on the driver, besides there are more upgrades for the rsx then the 350z, plus the 350 z is rwd, it's harder to control so you tend to slip, as for the rsx the fwd has better traction, so less time is reduced, but it all comes down to the driver
congrats you win the idiot of the thread award. how is a fwd goin to get better traction off the line? FWDs are the worst. when you acelerate, the weight shifts to the rear taking the weight off the front drive wheels. and when you actually start to make power ( 200whp ) the car spins its tires uncontrollably. go drive a turbo honda and you'll see what i mean.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts