|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
RSX Type-S VS 350Z
easy question: which would u prefer??
is the 350 much faster? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Quote:
350Z without a doubt. Unless you need more trunk space and a back seat. And yes the 350Z is significantly faster.
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Ummm. I think there is no real comparison among these cars. The 350Z will outperform the RSX in every category.
350Z - 0-60mph 5.4 1/4 mile 14.2 RSX-S - 0-60mph 6.3 1/4 mile 14.9 That is just acceleration which doesent mean that much, the 350Z is rear wheel and the RSX front wheel.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures)
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Yeah, the 350Z will light up the RSX-S in almost any performance category.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
why do all of the sudden people think RSX's are fast?
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Probably from something in the latest issue of one of the tuner mags.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
It all depends on the driver, besides there are more upgrades for the rsx then the 350z, plus the 350 z is rwd, it's harder to control so you tend to slip, as for the rsx the fwd has better traction, so less time is reduced, but it all comes down to the driver
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
The 350Z doesn't tend to slip at all unless you're in shitty weather. The 350Z has much more power, and you don't have to wait until 6000 rpm to get the brunt of it. It has better weight distribution, it gets better traction on launches, and it has better brakes and tires. I can see from your name that you're biased towards the RSX, but compared to the Z, it's just inferior.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
own type S- drove 350 Z . 350 is faster- acura is put together allot better
__________________
My Car domain Page http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/710825 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Yeah, I'll agree that the RSX is more solidly built and a much smoother ride.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
The RSX's 0-60 and quarter mile time: 6.1 14.8
And now the 350Z's 0-60 and quarter mile time: 5.4 13.6 So yes the 350Z is faster. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
13.6 is that right??????
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Sounds a bit low, but I guess it's possible. Motor Trend got a 13.7.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Quote:
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|