|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which front matches the CRX better? | |||
| The stocker |
   
|
14 | 66.67% |
| The newer |
  
|
7 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
02-17-2002, 04:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I got the comparison pics. 88-91 VS 96-98 front on CRX
Look at these pics, compare and vote which one looks better. You are all used to seeing the CRX with its 4G bumper. But look at the 6G. I think the 6G matches better to the shape of the CRX. Also the CRX with the 4G front has the Wings West kit, in which I want the sides and back from.
CRX, orig front:  CRX, 96-98 front:  Then vote and tell me what looks better.
__________________
My cars: Civic coupe EJ1. B16A, EG6 cluster. Wrecked/parting. CRX DX ED8. DOHC ZC, I/H/E.  EJ1 Civic Si . Screw Hatchbacks. Coupes just look better. Period... 
|
|
#2
02-17-2002, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that those Civic lights are a little too big for the CRX, I'm old school so I like the OG front end, but it isn't a bad conversion though..
www.thecrxdomain.com:bandit:
|
|
#4
02-17-2002, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
On the pic the 6th gen front looks pretty good but I too prefer the stock look a little better.
|
|
#5
02-17-2002, 06:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like'em both,really cannot decide
__________________
Proud member of AF's Lazy crew Snow,snow let it snow Af Nordic crew #008 team drift cat official member#5 Originally posted by sparq CANADA RULES :finger: CANADA RULES -- thats all that matters :ylsuper
|
|
#6
02-17-2002, 07:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the Rex with the 96-98 front looks better, it seems to blend in more with the shape of the car. I like it, how much does a conversion like that cost?
__________________
10 PRINT "MARC-OS 0WNZ J00!!!" 20 GOTO 10 RUN 4/8/04 - My CRX is officially dead, RIP Lucy 
|
|
#8
02-17-2002, 08:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i like the standard CRX front, the civic looks good but the one i really like is the gen 3 teg front on a crx
__________________
Original PureHonda Member JDM hybrid B18c EK sedan & EG Hatchback SiR Click here for Pictures
|
|
#9
02-17-2002, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
the 96-98 front is interesting, but i just like the stock lfront end
__________________
My 1990 Honda Civic Si i/h/e gude head gude cam gude ecu 2" lowering springs, camber kit etc. wings west front bumper powder coated GSR rims
|
|
#10
02-18-2002, 05:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm a purist, but I truly like the later model front end. It looks like it was designed for the CRX and really suits the lines of the car.
|
|
#11
02-18-2002, 05:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the original better, but thats probably because Im so used to seeing it.
Perhaps if id never seen either before I might like it more The 96-98 does suit the car and certainly makes it look newer though. Has anyone ever done a 5G conversion?
__________________
AF's resident BMC expert One by one the penguins steal my sanity
|
|
#12
02-18-2002, 01:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#13
02-18-2002, 03:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Setanta and Marc-OS knows side by side, 6Gen front macthes better to the shape of the CRX. The Teg front still makes the car look "old", and the 5Gen front looks good, but too similar. You can see a 5Gen front on a CRX at 89crx.com-pictures-conversions2. It uses the Wings West bumper in the pic of the red CRX, with 5en lights.
__________________
My cars: Civic coupe EJ1. B16A, EG6 cluster. Wrecked/parting. CRX DX ED8. DOHC ZC, I/H/E. EJ1 Civic Si . Screw Hatchbacks. Coupes just look better. Period...
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
