|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
ive got £16000 to spend on either a honda civic type r or a supra tt. Dont think the type r looks that nice but it fairly goes. Iwant a supra but practicality plays a (very small) part as my girlfriend has a 13 year old kid. Also quite worried about running costs of the supra due to its age. Wot do you think ?????? c'mon help me out here !!!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well supras are much nicer and faster than a civic type r. The problem is they are VERY expensive and you rarely find one in that price range that is in good condition. Do you like domestics? F bodies and mustangs are fast and inexpensive but they dont have much of a back seat for practicality, dont know about the back seat in a supra.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
Keep in mind that he is speaking in pounds, so he probably lives in the U.K.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well if you want both speed and practicality what about an older EVO or STI.
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Used E36 BMW M3. Its in your price range, has a rear seat, and its the best handling car in its time (C&D). If you have to haul three people around, the Supra is impossible.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC ![]() "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
Sorry, but the E36 M3 will not outhandle the Evo or STi from that time period. I don't care what C&D says
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
Quote:
Oh yeah, that would be around the EVO VI, especially the .5 Makkinen edition. Now that was an evo But i agree an E36 would be nice too.
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
They are both VERY different kinds of sports cars. TBH even if they where both in the same price range I dont see how you can be torn between them. One is a fat and fast(and can be made to go too fast easily) while the other is light, nimble and handles very well but is far from a strate line monster.
I too will recommend an STI or EVO for practicality and sportiness. They both handle very well and are fast to boot. Plus all the practicle sides of having a sadan(or for WRX maybe even a wagon/hatch). |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
You can get a lot for £16k.
My opinion: Civic Type-R - not convinced by the looks, fairly common, FWD. No thanks Supra - good luck finding a good one, i'd rather have an M3 anyway E36 M3 - awesome engine, classier than the Supra, can get a good evo "on a T" for ~£16k My one concern with the above two is that repairs could be steep, so you could also consider a used 330Ci that's still under warranty, which you can easily get for ~£16k. 230bhp, great interior, and can easily accommodate a kid in the back. Let us know what you go for. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
Quote:
oops, i didnt even notice that, sorry. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Supra Mk4 TT Vs Honda Civic Type R
Quote:
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC ![]() "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|