|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
| View Poll Results: Which engine setup do you like better? | |||
| Turbo |
   
|
8 | 61.54% |
| Naturally Aspirated |
  
|
5 | 38.46% |
| Stock |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
09-30-2004, 07:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Turbo or N/A?
Which do you guys prefer? I'm going turbo cuz i like the woooosh sound
 
__________________
1990 Civic EX 4-Door Sedan - D16A6 - 204k miles :: working on mechanical and cosmetic restoration :: 
|
|
#2
09-30-2004, 09:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like N/A because you get more respect that way.
__________________
1989 Honda CRX Si D16Z6 2.5 in Exhaust CAI Chikara Header
|
|
#4
09-30-2004, 10:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
I agree.. boost is fun..
__________________
"Short, sweet, and to the point" 1987 CRX Si - Project Si 'RexSi' 1996 Ford Thunderbird 4.6L V8 - Plastic Intake Manifold, FTL. 2004 Nissan Sentra, 1.8s - The "s" stands for smooth....... ?
|
|
#6
09-30-2004, 10:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
boost is the bollox!!!!
turbo turbo turbo !!!!!! i want one but couldnt justify the money !
__________________
Jim - Your Resident EDM Biatch B16A1 I/H/E 4TH GEN UK SITE Honda Civic EE9 1.6-i VT
|
|
#7
09-30-2004, 03:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
yummy should make this a stickyyyy omg stick stick sticky! vroom vroom pshhhhhhhhhhh!
__________________
1990 Civic EX 4-Door Sedan - D16A6 - 204k miles :: working on mechanical and cosmetic restoration ::
|
|
#8
10-03-2004, 03:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
Boost is fun, yeah that just about sums it up.... Get more respect that way... thats cute...
"Hey nice Porsche, too bad its a turbo... Or i woulda respected the car more..."
|
|
#9
10-03-2004, 04:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
rofl, that's like saying all cars that come from the factory with turbos are sissyz : P
__________________
1990 Civic EX 4-Door Sedan - D16A6 - 204k miles :: working on mechanical and cosmetic restoration ::
|
|
#11
10-03-2004, 09:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
Depends on the car and what I want to do with it. For a CRX I want a 220~hp responcive high revving NA for soloII and tight and twisty tracks.
but now if I had some bigger beast that needs power for the strip for the long halls then turbo all the way
|
|
#12
10-03-2004, 10:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i would say mild boost. 1) so you can take it to the strip and turn up the boost. 2) so you can still race road courses(under control).
i have a quick Q. what the hell do you need a BOV for...i know it sounds cool and all but do you really need it? i like the sleeper thing and wouldent want them to hear that i have boost(no BOV). the only reasion i ask is cuz most (or all) cars that come turbo from the factory do not have a blow off valve.
__________________
_________________________________http://VelocityFactor.com________________________________ 1990 si hatch b20b si tranny megan race header 2.5 custom exhaust 50 shot integra da rear disk (w/ 4040 valve) powerslot rotors and barded lines all around 1994 Dx hatch stock
|
|
#13
10-03-2004, 11:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or N/A?
you need a BOV to prevent compressor surge, you can recirculate it to reduce the noise.
I'm going to be building one of each. My hatch is a all out turbo setup, t3/t04e w/ built internals (will be done by spring, everything is finally comming together). It should be ~350whp and low 11's . Not daily driveable though. My 91 CRX Si is going all motor. relativly simple setup. Y8 head on stock a6 block, I/H/E, and a cam. might squeeze it a little, looking to get that into the low 14s w/ full interior. Its a daily driver so im trying to keep it as stock as possable w/o being too slow.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
