|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
http://msn.foxsports.com/story/3032766
Quote:
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
WTF
Quote:
And what is up with that hint about Senna. Would the championship be better with a Senna Schumi rivalry? Sure. But what has Ferrari or Schumacher have to do with it. Its not their fault he died. So why even bring that up. Seriously Ecclestone whines like a kid that Ferrari is too good.
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
Bad thing about Eccelstone is that he is such a tosser that God (or the other guy) will be in no hurry to meet him. So I guess we're stuck with him.
There is an element of truth in what he says, Ferrari have often been the stumbling block to changes in F1. But Bernie is the supposed architect behind the Concorde Agreement, which gives Ferrari the power. So he is only highlighting his own failure. Can't say I agree on the Senna bit either. Schumacher would have won 1994 anyway, given the superiority of the Benetton. Maybe Senna would have been harder to take out at Adelaide though? Williams 1995 year went bad in the middle due to reliability, doubt that would have been different with Senna. Granted he probably would have made less mistakes than Hill did towards the end but by then it would have been too late. And by the time the Brawn-Byrne-V10-Bridgestone combination got up to speed at Ferrari, Senna would have been retired anyway. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
Quote:
LOL good one Quote:
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
Actually it kind of works out the other way, Ferrari seem to be the only team that want to stick with the FIA’s hare brained schemes when they don’t work. Here is the scenario: Max and the FIA railroad through their changes using "force majeure' or safety as a premise. It proves to be a failure, so the majority of the teams propose to change it back to the way it was. However under the Concorde Agreement a certain majority of teams are needed to overturn the decision. Ferrari most of the time are the dissenter. Not only that but because of the way the Agreement is written Ferrari's vote carries more weight than any other team. That scenario played out on changes to re-ban refuelling after Verstappen’s fire in 1994, to get rid of the narrow track and grooved tyres after the ugly reality set in late 1997. Now Bernie seems to be saying they have vetoed changes away from single lap qualifying.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
And to think all this time i thought all times were in it for themselves, now i undeerstanfd that theyre there to help the pther guy out and get screwed in the ass.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can see it from both sides. Bernie realises that the sport isnt as exciting as it could be...however, I believe that a lot of that is down to the FIA's knee jerk rule changes rather than Bernie or Ferrari. The FIA changed the qualifying regs to make it supposedly 'better'. Has it? No, the old qualifying system was better...why did they change it? to harm Ferrari. If they want the teams to become closer and more in competition with each other then I would say that they should leave the regs alone for a few years...that lets the lower budget teams catch up. No way are they going to be as good as the top teams but it stops them having to go through all the expense of designing and building a new car for each season. If they had that sort of stability I doubt that Jaguar would be in the position that they are currently in.
When Bernie calls ferrari selfish it is beginning to piss me off...Why are they selfish? Because they want to win? I can see why they dont want yet another change to qualifying because they were against the changes in the first place. They were railroaded through without Ferraris wishes behind the new rules and consequently Ferrari suffered from that (close fight to the wire last year) because their car was optimised for totally different rules (fuel weights totally change the cars characteristics). Also becasue the fuel tank had to be bigger, Ferrari couldnt work as it was designed when the ballast was used as they couldnt fit the amount in that was originally designed for the car. Ferrari don't want yet another vhange becasue the rules seem constantly designed to hurt their competitiveness against the other teams...In addition, they have had to scrap most of the work that they have done on next years car due to yet more knee jerk reactions brought in recently by the FIA. OOps, Sorry for such a long rant, its been a hard day at work and im tired! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Ecclestone calls Ferrari `selfish'
Bernie can kiss my arse. He's only interested in the profits and not the racing it seems.
Fuck ém. |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|