|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a friend with a 92 camy 4dr. [It has a 1.6L] and i have a 98 4dr 2.2 cavi, and he says he will blow me so i was wonderin who would win..
both cars are automatics, and stock except his aftermarket muffler
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
I would have to say the camry I have driven both of these cars and a 2.2 4dr is slow as hell... and the camry does have a little get up for a 1.6 but i am sure it will be a slow win lol...
__________________
-Jay Jones Team DROPZONE Vice President
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
carmmy
So are you saying that the cavalier 2 dr is faster then the cavalier 4 door? i used to have a cavalier 4 door LS, it was not bad speed, the thing i liked about it most was the 4 gear tranny
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
i wana find a 2.2 super or turbocharged to swap in it
lol |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
opps i ment 2.4
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
i have one in my garage just needs new heads and bearings. but if you want to turbo or super it you should upgrade those things anyway. and no i am just saying the 2.2 in these are not fast.
__________________
-Jay Jones Team DROPZONE Vice President
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
how much would u want for it..... 2.4 right .... miles.... and how much would the head and bearings cost?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
i am not sure. some1 told it would be better to just drop a new one in so i found one out of a grand am it 30 k on it and dropped it right in runs great. but the one that is bad i was going to build it up and i havent started it it had 57k on it when i spun a bearing. by the time it gets shipped you might be able to find one at a junk yard the grand am has the same motor and the sunfires might be able to find a good one for about 500
__________________
-Jay Jones Team DROPZONE Vice President
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
1992 Camry should have a 2.2 4 cylinder with about 135 horsepower, which is more than you have. Of course, the Camry should be heavier, too. I'd say it would be close, but the Camry would win.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
he told me it has a 1.6 and i saw it
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: who would take it?
Don't worry, I'm not saying you're lying. I'm just saying what it "should" have.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who would take it?
i would have to say the cavy would win. ive run many camrys around my town and won there slow.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: who would take it?
Quote:
In 1998, Cavaliers came with 2 engines, the 2.2L and the 2.4L. The base model and the RS had the 2.2L I-4, ranked at 120hp. The curb weight was just over 2,600lbs. Camrys never came with a 1.6L. In fact, the only Toyota that did come with a 1.6L was the 88-97 Corolla. Your friend is full of shit, you need to train your eyes better, and the Cavy would beat the Toyota.
__________________
MAKE ART, NOT WAR |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|