|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
275HP without turbo... Possible???
My goal is to get my engine 275hp without a turbo, and then add a turbo later.
things i got.. Competition Light Flywheel Kryptonite stage 3 Clutch Intake Short Shifter Things ill get.. 1.GREDDY EXHAUST http://www.hopupracing.com/grmxcaexsyni.html or 1.BLITZ EXHAUST http://www.hopupracing.com/blrettexni24.html 2.ROSS RACING PISTONS http://attila.sdsu.edu/~mmikse/domai...rosska24de.htm 3.PAUTER PEENEED RODS http://attila.sdsu.edu/~mmikse/domai...rodska24de.htm 4.http://store.modacar.com/products/Nissan/240SX/MODALSD (the $800 one) 5.VENOM PERFORMANCE CHIP http://www.eautoworks.com/ORD-Auto~P...00-No-5192.htm 6.ELECTRIC RADIATOR FAN http://srownersclub.com/Merchant2/me...gory_Code=EFAN will free up some HP 7.PORT AND POLISH INTAKE 8.PORT AND POLISH HEAD 9.GREDDY HEAD GASKET 10.ALUMINUM RADIATOR how much HP am i looking total here about? any idea? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
i dont think you can build a high hp NA motor and plan to turbo it later, because in order to get high hp from NA you need high compression, so its either one or the other...
I would just turbo it first, NA is boring. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
yeah i agree with dekand, turbos are much more fun, easier power too
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
Why Can't You Turbo A High Comression Motor?
5 Pounds Of Boost On A High Compression Motor Is Going To Yeild Quicker Boost Response And Similar Power As A 8.5 To 1 Compression Boosted 14psi Motor. The Higher Compresion Just Lowers The Boost Threshold And Raises The Cylinder Temps.... You Just Can't Boost Too Much And Have Have To Concetrate On Intake Cooling And Fuel Delivery.
__________________
IF I AM TYPING IN CAPS (LIKE NOW) I AM SORRY BECAUSE I AM AT WORK (DATA ENTRY) AND I HAVE NO CAPS LOCK BUTTON AND NO WAY TO CHANGE MY UPPER CASE LETTERING. SORRY! EMAIL CONTACT: [email protected] |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, if you have a real good setup turboing with higher compression might not be all too bad, you have to have your car tuned GOOD as well. Depends on your goal, if you want 400-500hp id say lower the compression, If you want 200-300 it could be done with higher compression, in between there depends on your money and how good you can get the computer tuned to run the right amount of fuel, which is more important with the higher compression.
oh and N/A is more exciting then turbo by far when your racing, real men leave the hammer down and the ITB's screaming... the boys break out the turbo to run boost and try to catch em.. with no where near the same throttle response of power delivery... hehehe |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes power delievery for a turbo is not exactly the greatest. however why spend soo much money on a N/A thats not even goin to be close to making 275hp and is always on the threshold of tearing itself apart? a high tuned n/a motor is more stressful then a light turbo setup. yet the turbo setup will yeld more power. also that setup of yours is goin to cost more then putting a turbo in. and also yes you got a point about your compression yelding more hp. however its alot more knock prone. no matter how little boost you run. also if you got a ecu tuned for n/a your gonna have to scrap it again becusae n/a tune is by leaning out and advancing timing. the 2 biggest no no's for a turbo car. so that combined with hi compression pistons = blown engine heaven. i know a guy who has 9:1 forged pistons in his 240. he didn't do shit about the timing. and he was running fatter injectors and had a wide band 02 sensor and was running 10-11:1 A/F ratio and he still blew his engine 3 times!!!! so tuning plays a big part definitly. considering that i still have my stock 9.5:1 compression and is still running strong with no smoke for over 30K mile.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Also if you want high power with an NA engine, you'll need some really aggressive cams which will mess with your idle and you'll have a powerband that'll make driving the car around a huge pain.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
agree.... why n/a on a nissan??? get a honda or something that is rev happy and has a smaler displacement. ka dznt have a secondary timing for the cams (like a Verialble timing that is found on the new SR's) so u will idel like sh#T!for gods sake it is a truk engine! plus it will cost u allot more then a turbo set up, and it will not deliver the power that u expect. anything is posible with money, and u idea is bold but i call bullsh$t on that one...
__________________
"A good driver is measured not by his lap times, but by the amount of time he spend trying to make sense of his car" E.K. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, that set up i was thinking was for turbo, because of the low compression pistons. So lets say i put that same set up as i first said and throw a greddy turbo on there, and run it out of the box with 6psi... what would that put my engines HP to?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
275 N/A on a stroked SR20 with 300+ duration cams, 12:1+ compression, and ITBs. Likely (id do it if I had the big bucks)
275 N/A on a KA with off the shelf parts and a turbo in the future. NEVER |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say
I say go low compression and high boost... the money and time saved and the "better" HORSEPOWER is the difference.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
I dont know much about engines, but from the little I know the engine may have bigger displacement than the SR20 but it aint a big block so it aint worth it unless you got the money
__________________
The Wheels on the Bus go round and round, all day long! |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
NA cars are more fun to race and beat on....... its like a night and day difference between a turbo car and a decent N/A car, sure the turbo can have more power, this doesn't nessecarily make it faster.
Since the N/A engine has better throttle response, and a more liner power curve, it is a bit more stable when trying to take hard corners and at the same time adding more power, or just keeping the throttle down. with a turbo you have to keep the pedal down and build up boost to hit your power, and its just not the same power delivery if your not on the gas 100%. so this type of setup doesn't provide the best engine for a tight road course, back roads, auto crossing, etc... now on a Super Speedway or a big road course it wouldn't matter as much, since throttle manipulation isn't as big of a factor. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
Quote:
You made a very good point, its just that I dont see the point in getting 275hp out of the ka while N/A, but if you know your share of engines and know what your doing than go for it right? everyone whos saying "turbo" are trying looking at it from a "practical" point of view but than again who says going N/A isnt practical??? But that is in general, if he decides to invest/spend his money and time than I just hope its well spent ya know. We all know that N/A cars with a lot power are TOO fun to drive and Ive had my share of N/A cars that I wish everyone could of experienced... those are just my
__________________
The Wheels on the Bus go round and round, all day long! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 275HP without turbo... Possible???
Quote:
I just read this post for Higher RPM Range and wow thats pretty good to know, I have a question to ask also. the 12:1 ratio is really high, so Im thinking it will still be safe to upgrade it after you've done what you have said in that post you made right? BTW if my question sounds stupid your talking to a and yeah so basically after that setup you just mentioned what other upgrades could you do? and do you think it still could be streetable?
__________________
The Wheels on the Bus go round and round, all day long! |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|