Riced Out Mustang's/Corvettes

[ViperJ]

Let me first start of by saying there are some good looking civic's/acura's out on the streets. I don't hate ricers as long as the look clean. Now with that said what do you guys think of a mustang or corvette with aftermarket lights. Are they rice or do they still look cool? Now check out this stang rice or not?
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/ghettostang.html

I do like this guys taillights, what about you guys?
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/other_ghetto_stang.htm

[HighRev87]

RICE RICE RICE!
Seriously I hope the owners of each choke on soy sauce.

[Mshkttck]

EEW that's disgusting! DONT Put aftermarket tailights on a mustang!

BTW. 'supra', 'neuspeed', and 'DC sports' stickers on mustangs is rice

[genjy]

You can't really "rice" a Corvette. A rice means that a low performance car is customized to look fast. A Corvette with a hundred APC and Type-R stickers on it is still a high performance car that can outrun and outhandle most cars on the road.

[Jimster]

Originally Posted by genjy

You can't really "rice" a Corvette. A rice means that a low performance car is customized to look fast. A Corvette with a hundred APC and Type-R stickers on it is still a high performance car that can outrun and outhandle most cars on the road.

No it doesn't. Rice is an attitude, if a guy puts Altezzas on his Civic purely for decoration, is he a ricer? No, he understands they are for decaration.

[01rollaS&accordv6]

the mustangs are severly ghetto the tails are okay, if you think those are ugly you should see the ones here in my area form the oldies to the new ones! camaros and mustangs and firebirds are number one here.

[HighRev87]

Originally Posted by 01rollaS&accordv6

the mustangs are severly ghetto

Yes

Originally Posted by 01rollaS&accordv6

the tails are okay

No

Originally Posted by 01rollaS&accordv6

from the oldies to the new ones! camaros and mustangs and firebirds are number one here.

Nothing wrong with that.

[tblake]

that is the worst looking mustang I've ever seen in my life. I'd rather have a stock one right off the lot. Althought I'd take a camaro or vette over a mustang anyway, so it doesnt really matter.

[otter7467]

God I hate Mustangs

[jncodave]

both of those cars just look stupid. the taillights are ok, they look better on certain cars than others, but they cost like $200-$250. i wouldnt pay that much for taillights.

[Mase]

mustangs aren't race proven (recently) and they're always the slowest in their class.....i don't get ford sometimes...

[HighRev87]

Originally Posted by Mase

mustangs aren't race proven (recently) and they're always the slowest in their class.....i don't get ford sometimes...

Are not race proven? Ill take your century with a stang . Slowest in thier class? What American car beats a Stang GT 99+ while in that price range?

[Rod&Custom]

[kfoote]

Originally Posted by HighRev87

Are not race proven? Ill take your century with a stang . Slowest in thier class? What American car beats a Stang GT 99+ while in that price range?

How about the late F-Bodies?

Both cars are legal for SCCA T2 racing, and the Firebirds/Camaros have won the Runoffs (national championship) for the last 3 years. The 2001 winner was an E36 BMW M3, and I can't find any results further back than that. The rules for the class keep the cars fairly close to stock, and in the areas where they're not stock, they get equal upgrades.

[clawhammer]

I personally don't care what my car looks like, all I care about is what is under the hood of my CRX. I don't spend money on tailights, and crap like that, only on the engine. Does that make me a ricer?