-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Coffee Break (Off-Topic) > COMPLETELY off-topic
Register FAQ Community
COMPLETELY off-topic Talk about anything other than cars. But you can't be mad and angry in this forum!
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-20-2004, 05:32 PM
eversio11's Avatar
eversio11 eversio11 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,952
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to eversio11
component vs S video

Just bought a new TV and DVD player, however I'm using these ancient A/V cables for hook up. If I'm going to spend $40-$50 on some high-end cables, I want to know which produces a better picture, Component cables or S video cable? TIA
__________________
"The greatest Americans have not been born yet,
they are waiting
patiently
for the past to die"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2004, 05:48 PM
lamehonda's Avatar
lamehonda lamehonda is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: component vs S video

I think you should just go with s-video unless you only want the very best, cause I sure can't tell the difference just by looking at it(and that is what you are doing when you are watching tv right?)
__________________
1987 Honda Accord LX-Dead
1999 Honda Accord EX-L 5 sp-Sold
2006 Subaru WRX Wagon 5sp-Sold
2005 Nissan Frontier ext cab 4x4 4.0L-Sold
2006 Kawasaki Ninja 500r-Sold
2004 Yamaha FZ1 Silver/Black- Sold
2008 Mazdaspeed 3-In the driveway
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2004, 06:19 PM
tenguzero tenguzero is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 841
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MY suggestion would be S-video and optical for audio (or digital coax, pretty much the same quality.) You can get a good S-video cable for pretty much beans (They'll often give you one with the equipment when you buy it.) The component (RGB) cables are considerably more expensive, and you really aren't going to notice much more of a difference. IMO, the logical step up from S-video/Component is HD, but as we're all aware of, that's still an underutilized technology.

Go with the S-video, it'll do just fine for you. If you still insist on spending more for cables, then go with the Monster brand. Although to be perfectly honest with you, I've had a hard time detecting signal quality difference between gold and standard (unless you're operating near some major interference-producing equipment) and I sold this stuff for over a year working for the Shack.
__________________
(k) TZero publications. All rights reversed. Reprint what you like. Fnord
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2004, 01:35 PM
Hyatus Hyatus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: component vs S video

s-video
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-21-2004, 01:52 PM
eversio11's Avatar
eversio11 eversio11 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,952
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to eversio11
Re: component vs S video

Awesome, thanks tengu. So everything Monster is trying to push with their gold plated, zero impedance crap is that it reduces interference? I just have a receiver, DVD player, and a TV; none of that stuff would really require double gold super plated cables?
__________________
"The greatest Americans have not been born yet,
they are waiting
patiently
for the past to die"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-21-2004, 06:51 PM
shconer shconer is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It really depends on your TV and DVD. If you want a High Defintion display and your TV has the ability to reproduce the quality then go for the component its the best exept for a really digital HD conection witch most DVD players dont support. The wires will last for ever. Dont wast your money on an optical coax, the only benifits of the optical is zero interfierance and light speed reaction times. But all the benifits are basicly wasted in a low end sound system because the internials in the amp and DVD player are wired so unless you have a really high end system or have problems with external interferance dont spend over double for the same as a good wired coax.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2004, 12:39 AM
LEGO MY E's Avatar
LEGO MY E LEGO MY E is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Component = 1
S-Video = 2
Composite = 3
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2004, 10:35 AM
my3rdskyline's Avatar
my3rdskyline my3rdskyline is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to my3rdskyline
Re: component vs S video

component video is better than S-Video. here's how it works sort of
composite: one yellow cable. all colors, refresh, and sync in one cable. very compressed and not good quality.
S-Video. the colors are all in one cable, brightness are in another and the refresh and sync are in other cables. good quality.
component: separate cable for each color with the sync compressed. Better quality than S-Video. If your TV has component video, USE IT. it's the best (unless you've got a DVI input)
DVI is a direct digital connection. Not sure if the cable layouts are exacly right because that was off the top of my head, but I'm sure the quality is this order-> composite, S-Video, component, DVI.
Hope it helps
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2004, 11:28 AM
DVS LT1 DVS LT1 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LOL I've been out of electronics sales for nearly two years but I'll correct a bit of what my3rdskyline said (but that was good!).

In a yellow RCA cable, chrominance and luminance are passed through.
In S-Vid, there are actually two cables in the jacket that separate chrominance and luminance.
In Component video, one of the cables is for chrominance, and for the other two it is the luminance that is actually split into two signals. (lol it might be the other way around where luminance is one cable, and chrominance is split into the other two).

This is why the jump from RCA to S-vid gives the biggest noticeable improvement. S-Vid to component is really only half as much of an improvement because it’s only one of the signals thats being improved.

Bottom line: cables are overpriced (way overpriced), but IMO they are worth having. The Monster THX stuff at Best Buy is absolute crap – go with a good set of Monster M series or Component Video II or III. Those gold conductors DO make a difference (it won’t blow your socks off but it’s definitely there). Look for the conductors that are cut along the sides and have a centre plug that is split in half – all this is done so the conductor fits real tight with its terminal. Don’t bend those cables 90 degree either, people have no idea how bad that is for cables.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Coffee Break (Off-Topic) > COMPLETELY off-topic


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts