-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-10-2004, 01:58 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Remote Turbo

i was thinking about getting a remote turbo charger, ive read all the pros and cons about them and im pretty interested in getting one. But im not sure which one to get. I havent found any that are designed for my 2001 2.4L cavalier, usually the ones i see are only for trucks, fbodys, or suvs. Does it matter if its not designed for my car? Which one would be best for my car? Im only looking for about 4-7PSI of boost, nothing drastic.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2004, 02:46 PM
SaabJohan SaabJohan is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

What pros? There aren't any, only cons. Anyone that claims that there is any advantages with this obviously doesn't know the basics behind turbocharging. Spend your money on a real system instead.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2004, 02:21 PM
Jet-Lee's Avatar
Jet-Lee Jet-Lee is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jet-Lee Send a message via Yahoo to Jet-Lee
Re: Remote Turbo

how bout an electric turbo? I mean, a turbo with the compressor being driven by an electric motor instead of exhaust flow. Operated by push button, when you want. What rpm does a turbo usually provide adequate boost at?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2004, 03:06 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

i dont think you understand what a remote turbo is, a remote turbo is one where the turbo itself is sitted back just in front of the muffler. This makes it run cooler and alot easier to install. Can anyone list a few companies that make remote turbos? So far the only one play ive seen on at is http://www.ststurbo.com.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2004, 03:17 PM
Jet-Lee's Avatar
Jet-Lee Jet-Lee is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jet-Lee Send a message via Yahoo to Jet-Lee
Re: Remote Turbo

I understand just fine, but requiring that much tubing to go all the way back to the engine compartment, doesn't sound logical or efficient. Sounds to me like wasted money and made up testimonials. Would my application not be a type of remote turbo?
****************************************
courtesy of dictionary.com---
re·mote ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-mt)
adj. re·mot·er, re·mot·est

1. a. Located far away; distant in space.
. b. Hidden away; secluded: a remote hamlet.
2. Distant in time: the remote past.
3. Faint; slight: a remote possibility; had not the remotest interest.
4. Far removed in connection or relevance: a cause remote from everyday concerns.
5. Distantly related by blood or marriage: a remote cousin.
6. Distant in manner; aloof.
7. Operating or controlled from a distance: remote sensors.
8. Computer Science. Located at a distance from another computer that is accessible by cables or other communications links: a remote terminal.

n.
1. A radio or television broadcast originating from a point outside a studio.
2. A remote control device.
****************************************

Where yours would be maybe adj. def #1, would mine not be adj. def #'s 7 or 8?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2004, 05:46 PM
SaabJohan SaabJohan is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Remote Turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
i dont think you understand what a remote turbo is, a remote turbo is one where the turbo itself is sitted back just in front of the muffler. This makes it run cooler and alot easier to install. Can anyone list a few companies that make remote turbos? So far the only one play ive seen on at is http://www.ststurbo.com.
This page does only contain a lot of bullshit. The turbine is driven by heat in the massflow and the kinetic energy in the pulses, you want the turbocharger as close to the engine as possible where it can convert this energy as efficienct as possible. As the compressor needs a certain amount of power, so to make this power of the exhaust gasses that contains less energy the expansion ratio over the turbine will increase, so you will get more exhaust pressure. The lag will also become massive.

And by the way... electric driven superchargers don't work, at least the ones you can buy, they are simply just small fans that sits in the way of the airflow, in best case they doesn't reduce the power of the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2004, 10:34 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

i thought the turbo was spun by the pressure of the exhaust, im pretty sure its not heat. And the website says the turbo is fully spooled by 3,000 RPMS. As for lag, yes their might be some, not much more than adding a intercooler. With my car i would prolly need to at 7FT of tubiing to connecting the turbo to the intake. A good intercooler could easily have that much in tubbing, but i dont need to run an intercooler if i run this. Im not looking for high PSI either, 6-8 PSI at most. As for lagging cause of the long pipe, i dont think their would be that much because of the dynamics of airflow. When air is pushed, the air molecules dont move through the air, instead they push the air molecules in front of them, like a big massive chain reaction. The webpag does that that 1/4-1/2 PSI can be lost in the pipping, but thats not a big deal to me, cause im not looking for massive performance, just something to play around with and take to the track every once in a while. I dont want to spend really more than 2G's on it. Not to mention my automotive skills are a little lacking.

As for electric superchargers, yes i think like 99% of them are all a bunch of BS, a fan cant create PSI, but a turbo can. So since i need to pay off some bills (nice amount of credit card debt) i decided to try one out, i havent gotten it yet, but it should be here withing the next 3-4weeks (it was on back order). Anyways this is the best claims ive ever seen for an electric supercharger, and it comes with a 10HP moneyback guarante. So worst case i spend a few bucks on shipping. The E-Turbo claims 800CFM airflow @ 2PSI with a 12V motor.
https://cargodzcc.hivelocity.net/cgi...egory_Code=pi1

if it works, great ill be happy with 10HP, if not ill just send it back and get my money back. I know of all the scams on ebay and ive searched through a ton of these things, and this one was by far the best yet. If it can produce 2 PSI, i should gain about 20HP. . .but we will just have to wait and see about it.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2004, 03:56 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exhaust pressure does not power the turbine, it is the remaining thermal energy in the exhaust that powers it. The colder the exhaust, the less energy you will be able to extract from it, and consequently you will have a slug of a turbo system. Think of it this way, if it were pressure that ran the turbine, then think what having exhaust gasses backed up against the turbine would do to your motor. Think about how much reversion would occur if it were exhaust pressure driving the turbine. The fact of the matter is the further away the turbocharger is from the exhaust ports, the colder the exhaust is going to get, and you will find very quickly that cold exhaust doesn't drive a turbocharger very well.

I could not read much of that page as it was painful to me to read so much crap in one dose. That site keeps mentioning heat as if it were some sort of issue with turbocharging, which is entirely false. Turbochargers are designed to endure torturous conditions and temperatures, and do so reliably for a long time. The turbine housing can get hot enough to glow, that is true, but that does not indicate some sort of fault in it's design.

If you wont take our word for it then here's some food for thought; Why is it that there has NEVER been a vehicle produced with a remote turbo setup?

Edit: Please don't tell me you are considering a electric turbo from cargodzcc. We have heard from them before, and needless to say they sounded like they were full of it. They would give facts and figures, then would refuse to support them or give us any proof other than their word.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.

Last edited by Sluttypatton; 08-13-2004 at 04:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2004, 11:46 AM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

ok so the remote turbo is a no go then, i was just cruious of it so thats why i asked about it here. As for the electric turbo, i want to give it a shot. I know theirs a good chance that it wont work, but you never know, this one might. With a 10HP money back guarante its by far not the worst one out there. Im not gonna be able to get a real supercharger or turbo for atleast 6 months, so this is just something to play around with.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2004, 12:15 PM
Jet-Lee's Avatar
Jet-Lee Jet-Lee is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jet-Lee Send a message via Yahoo to Jet-Lee
Re: Remote Turbo

I agree all those market electric turbo's are BS, it's a fan. I've even seen one where they said "It's similar to CPU cooling fan" HOW THE HELL DOES THAT BENEFIT YOU? those things can't produce PSI. My thought was to actually get a turbo, a real turbo. Take off the exhaust/turbine side, and use a powerful electric motor. Bolt the compressor housing to the motor housing, to an anchor point. Then attach the compressor wheel to the shaft of the electric motor. Wire this in with prollly an extra battery and some switches for charging and running. Just a thought, I'm going to be building this mostly to see how it compares to the market scams.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-13-2004, 01:06 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

^^ did you look at the link of the e-turbo i bought? thats pretty much exactly what it is. . .
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-13-2004, 01:26 PM
Jet-Lee's Avatar
Jet-Lee Jet-Lee is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jet-Lee Send a message via Yahoo to Jet-Lee
Re: Remote Turbo

what is the average rpm/speed range of a turbo pushing 6psi?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2004, 03:16 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

3,000 rpms i think. . .dont quote me on that.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-13-2004, 03:25 PM
psychorallyfreak's Avatar
psychorallyfreak psychorallyfreak is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to psychorallyfreak Send a message via AIM to psychorallyfreak Send a message via MSN to psychorallyfreak Send a message via Yahoo to psychorallyfreak
Re: Re: Remote Turbo

Mother of God.
I can't believe this.
Electric superchargers are a BAD idea. More drag on the charging system, less net horsepower.
Good old fashioned turbochargers, FREE horsepower.
Turbos are run on the exhaust PRESSURE, NOT HEAT.
When somebody says that heat is bad for a turbo, they probably mean extreme heat, and shutting the engine down without letting the turbo spool down first, doing damage to the bearings.
Or, they're just overworking their little turbo, over-spooling it, creating unnecessary heat.
And as far as when the turbo spools, depends on the trim of the turbine wheel, and its size.
Remote turbo? BS. no such thing. Anybody that does tout anything about it is giving you some hardcore Bull.
If you want to make your Cavalier more powerful, but don't want to spend a whole lot of money, don't expect to make a whole lot of power. LotsaBang-for-littlebuck factor is non-existent in the world of FI.
And that "tornado" thing? Utter stupidity.

Thanks for your time.

the FREAK.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-13-2004, 03:36 PM
-Jayson-'s Avatar
-Jayson- -Jayson- is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Remote Turbo

no one is talking about a tornado thing. . .

i never said i dont want to spend a whole lot of money, but i got rear ended like a month ago and had to a 1,000 dollar deductable to get my car fixed, on top of that i have about 1,000 dollars worth of credit card debt right now, so my plans for the GM supercharger or a turbo charger are on hold for a bit. Did you even read the thread?
I said i want to spend about 2G's on a turbo or supercharger, the Gm supercharger is about 2G's and will put my HP up to almost 200HP. I was looking around pricing turbos and i saw a remote turbo so i asked about it. Im only looking for about 6 PSI of boost at most, that will give me well over 200HP. Im not looking to make a speed freak performance machine, just something to have fun with every now and then at the track and to beat on a few other cars that dont respect cavaliers.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts