|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
aftermarket support
is it true that the aftermarket support for 3g eclipses really sucks? or is there really a good aftermarket out there to make a 3g Eclipse pretty fast. with pretty fast i mean 12s or 13s.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: aftermarket support
To get that, you need to have forced induction. If you have a GT, you have 2 options. The AAI turbo kit from me or the RippMods supercharger. The turbo kit makes more power and is overall cheaper.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
building the engine might get you into the 13s but that can get expensive
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
Turbochargers OWN motoring and superchargers. Bang for the buck. Going out all motor can get extrememly expensive. Superchargers are slow and require maintenence and are expensive. I think ive seen turbo kits for 2G 2.4 ltrs though...
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
mybuddy has a v6 3g....with Nos his runnin 13's..
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
NOS is temporary, bad for your motor, has to be refilled, u gotta time it, etc. its not a solution for everyday driving or casual racing.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: aftermarket support
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
the turbo for our cars are like $3500, and the superchargers are like $3800. how can u say that superchargers are expensive??
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: aftermarket support
Supercharging all depends on the application and the tune of the system. Those drag cars that run 4-6sec 1/4 miles all use roots style supercharging.
this discussion has been waged before. The better method really lies in the eye of the beholder. The 3G reacts very well to supercharging, but even better to turbo. Other cars react better to supercharging and not turbo. It really all depends. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
i think the RS/GS respond better to a turbo, and the GT/GTS respond better to superchargers
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: aftermarket support
Im not sure what you mean by cars "reacting" better to supercharging or turbocharging. If a supercharger kit is easily available for a car, but no turbo kit, then yes i guess the car would "react" better, The fact is, turbocharged cars have always been faster. this may seem somewhat of an open ended statement, but for street cars, though supercharging ofcourse makes for more hp than stock motoring, turbos are faster, and the components of turbocharging are a lot more upgradeable.
Same hp? Turbos hit peak boost at 3000-4500 RPM...superchargers are belt driven and hit peak at...well, redline. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: aftermarket support
That is not true. Centrifugal superchargers hit max boost at redline. Roots and screw blowers hit max boost at about 1300 rpm.
plus, I know of a WRX running a turbo that does not spool until 4700 rpm. And fact is that there is now a turbo kit for all versions of the 3G. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: aftermarket support
Quote:
well said
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: aftermarket support
Quote:
__________________
![]() Don't act like you don't love it.
503/2000 |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: aftermarket support
The last time I ran anything with a supercharger was a 1970 camero. Off the line a turbo would start to walk away from me but down the stretch I would eat the turbo. You have to consider the type of supercharger and tubro boost. There are TOO many different combination that can be tried. If you want something totally freaky try combining a turbo for initial accelleration with a supercharger to backside power. Don't try it unless you have more money to throw away than the military spends on an F117
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|