|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| 240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars) The original Z cars - ones that started it all. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi guys,
I'm new to this forum and had a search to see if I can find any info on this so please bare with me if it's been covered. I'm looking at buying a '92-'94 (from the research I've done it seems as though these years are the choice to buy ? comfort wise as well as engine wise ..) and am trying to decide whether to buy a TT or a NA. Insurance aside, and keeping in mind that my girl is going to be driving it as well (not a rev head. but will drive it if its not 'hard to drive').. Which would you guys suggest ? They both seem to be going for about the same price around here (Syd, Australia) - The main things I am concerned about are : i) Maintenance - Is the TT much more of a pain to keep running ? eg. do the turbos and added bits often cause much trouble ? (I won't really be giving it much of a hard time.. although that said I am partial to a bit of acceleration, and i do like having a powerful car.) ii) Cost - Does the TT use much more in fuel when driven as a daily driver ? iii) Power - Do the turbos really make heaps of a difference as a daily driver, I understand they kick in at about 3k RPM ? .. I have a holden Commodore now and I know this sounds soft, but driving around the city i rarely get much past 3k RPM.. although it is an auto. The 300 would 90% chance be a manual. Any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated guys, Thanks for reading my painfully long post
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
O we've seen longer bud
(God that sounded... Gross)Anyways, Twin Turbo Zeds can be a bitch to maintain... They are FUN cars, but pray every night that nothing goes wrong with them, as they can be expensive to fix. If I were in your situation... I would get an R32 GTR and drive that. The RB series engines are much easier to get work done to. As Apposed to the VG30DETT (Z32 Twin Turbo). Zed's must run on 93 Octane, no less. The only case you would put in anything less, would be to make it to a station... With 93 Octane. Granted, most performance cars require 93. But either way, Zed's have the attention needs of a small child. (Change my oil! Clean my EGR! Change my water pump! WIPE MY ASS!) But any sports car is going to be like that... All im saying is the Skyline GTR is much easier to work on, and generally a better car. Hope you make a choice you can live with. -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
what he said... but i've got a few things to add... if you're buying a TT ZX you're not supposed to be worried about gas, it's going to cost you, but if you have the money to maintain it and pay for insurance, lets hope you're not worried about paying for petrol.
secondly... how experienced is this woman driver? what sort of driving record does she have? if it's nothing less than perfect i wouldn't let her anywhere near this 300 hp rocket.. then again, i suppose i'm stereotyping most women as bad drivers, but hey, a lot of them are pretty bad.. anyway, IMO go stick or go home... the amount of control with a manual is something i would never want to give up... plus it's just so much more fun to drive... double clutching, heel-toe.. you get my drift.. something to do when you take her out for a night of hard driving. thirdly... how mechanicall inclined are you? are you up to the task of regular maintinence eg, oil changes, cleaning the EGR like Wes said.. doing regular changes and cleaning? if that sounds like too much for you, my suggestion is to go for the skyline or another car, because chances are something is going to break when you're out driving, and if you have no idea how to fix it or what went wrong, you could be digging yourself a grave.. anyway.. just my
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #61988 300zx turbo 5spd. 3" mandrel exhaust, filter, afco rad, e-fan, poly engine mounts, mbc at 8.5 psi, turboxs rfl-h bov, gutted plenum, etc. blown turbo, under construction.. gt35 coming. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
Precisely... Once again.
Just ONE correction... JDM Zeds are 276bhp due to smaller turbos. Granted, this gives a higher horse power feeling due to a MUCH quicker spool-up time. But in the long-run, USDM Zed's are much faster. But still... I wouldnt let the girl near it. "... Which ones the clutch?" Just messing. -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
Thanks so much for your input guys, I'm starting to lean more towards the NA side now. Although I guess the best way is to go out and see if I can test drive a few
![]() The girl is a pretty good driver, she's a good 10yrs older than me. Although, that said, she still freaks out a bit in traffic etc.. I think the reality of it is I'll probably get her another car pretty soon down the track anyways .. I guess I don't really 'need' all that power, I mean like I stated above, it will be a daily driver. But it would be nice to be able give it to some of the millions of commodores around here ![]() I'm not bad with cars, I can do the mundane things myself, short of digginig deep in the engine bay. And have a pretty good mechanical sense. Do the extra things on the TT, Like the HICAS cause probs ? I've heard ppl say that the HICAS is more of a nusiance than a help. More things to break ? I guess the main question for me is whether the TT's are going to be too much of a hassle to maintain. :/ Some ppl have told me that if you treat it right, the Z will go forever with minor maintenence, and others have told me that it's a bitch .. I love my cars and so it would get regular servicing etc etc.. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
Non-Turbo and Turbo Zed's are tough to work on either way.
HICAS (HIgh Capcity Active Steer) does cause problems, and there are HICAS Immobilizer kits made. But typically its just for people who Auto-X their Zed's. Anyways, I still think you should go with GTR... Personally. -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
As a side note: what the difference between GTSTs and GTRs enginewise (for R32, 33 & 34)?
-Mike |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
GTR's were powered by the RB26DETT Engines
RB - Factory Code "Racing Breed/Built" 26 - 2598cc D - DOHC (Dual Over Head Cam) E - ECCS (Electronic Concentrate Control System) TT - Twin Turbo Chargers 276bhp factory rated. AWD (ATTESSA) AWS (HICAS) absolute BEAST. The GTS-T and GTS-25T Skylines were powered by the RB20DET engine. And the RB25DET (GTS-25T R33) RB20DET - 220bhp RB25DET - 250bhp Love me some RB's man... Cast Iron Bullet Proof Block. ![]() -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
dude what the other guys have said is all very good advice but u gotta remember bro that they are in the States where skylines r fucken un common, so they all want one!
in Aus u see heeps of them ALL the time so much so that they are too common, i sure ul agree. With the petrol situation, drive like a granny and ull get quite good milage. the TT are more expensive to maintian due to the turbos and all the problems they can cause, but ask any TT owner and they say its all worth it. deffinatly get a manual car, i have no fucken clue why the fuck ppl make sports cars with antomatic transmissions its just stupid! the above advice is all really good (exept samhain, Rb does not stand for Race bred, lots and lots of confusion about it, masssive debates on skyline forums and such. it is just an engine code, like VG, that ppl applied the 'race bred' connotation to) My advice dude get the NA, and if u wanna drop in the TT motor then do so later on, it only costs about $2500 for a good motor, the money u will save buying a NA to start off with u can spend later on on the VG30DETT just me thow, ur call dude |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm always pushing the TT.
Your call. Or you could just get a spare JATO solid stage booster rocket (capable of 10,000+ lbs of thrust in about 3 seconds from ignition) and strap a saddle to it.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo ![]() Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
good advice from everyone, however, i must suggest not to take it as gospel... in the end it's your decision, which may or may not be based on the advice you have received. it's good that everyone here is not pushing something that is the absolute bottom line thing you Must do... even if you go a different route.. stick around with these guys.. they're a good group
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #61988 300zx turbo 5spd. 3" mandrel exhaust, filter, afco rad, e-fan, poly engine mounts, mbc at 8.5 psi, turboxs rfl-h bov, gutted plenum, etc. blown turbo, under construction.. gt35 coming. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
PistolPete I said RB was Factory Code. RB is just rumored to stand for "Racing Built/Breed"
You obviously didnt read what I said about Skylines. Im not one of these kids going "OOOOOOOO GET A SKYLINE!!!!"... Im saying get a Skyline because they are much easier to work on, and dont have the needs of a VG (By the way, the V in VG signifies engine alignment... VH45DE, VK56DE, VQ33E... All V6 Engines) Skylines are simply built better. Nothing against Zed's, I love them. But really dude... You like cussing quite a bit. I see why you annoy MikeMan now... Because your annoying me with this. And ChaosAngel... Do whatever you please... Either way you win. ![]() -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
O and PistolPete...
Keep in mind to do a Twin Turbo swap it takes a LOT more than just the engine. Yes the Twin Turbo engine may only be $2,500 (In the states) But then you have the ECU that must be changed, the EFI Wiring, Transmission, Rear End. More work than you make it sound. -Wes
__________________
-2000 PY Acura Integra Type-R #686 - WhoRe -1997 EGP Honda Prelude Type-SH - Daily driver R.I.P Hypsi87:Andy Filson
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx '92-'94 TT or NA ?
word, yo~!
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|