|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I got a 2003 Silverado with the 4.3L 5 speed reg cab short box. i got a k&n filter and a flowmaster 40 series muffler. im getting 16 mpg in city and 18 1/2 on the highway. is this normal. what else can i do to make it better.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
ouch. The 4.3 is a v6 so you would think it would get better mileage than the V8, but in reality it is working so much harder it gets the same or worse mileage. I had the 4.3 in a 2002 S-10 and even in that it only got 19-20 MPG. Unfortunately to me that mileage sounds right, maybe a little low but not too far off.
__________________
Steve 2004 2WD 5.3 Xcab StepSide |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
How do you drive, honestly? I have a 2003 Extended Cab with the 4.3 and automatic, and I get 21/22 on the highway. That's driving 60-65 MPH (the speed my truck seems to coast at) and not stomping on it to get up to speed. If I go 70 or above, I drop to 18 MPG, and I can feel the truck working much harder to maintain that speed. Around town I get 17-18 MPG.
I have 26K miles on it, and the mileage has gotten better over time. The first 10k miles or so I got 19 MPG driving the same way on the highway. I have a bone stock truck, except for the stereo. I don't know if the filter and exhaust help or not. I plan on a bed cover, which may give me a little boost in MPG. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mpg question
I do drive it a little hard. i do about 80 down the freeway and speed up pretty quickly. i guess its right. but with people saying they get as much or better than me with the 5.3L got me wondering if i should be getting more.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
Like Steve ^ Said your asking a smaller motor (4.3) to pull a full size truck around at a speedy pace. The V-8 takes less throttle to get the truck up to speed. If i was to use a heavy foot w/ my truck all the time I would see a terrible decrease in mpg. On the Highway I cruise at 70-75 and usually use a light foot around town and in the city. I see 17-19mpg. My only tip for you is to lighten up on the throttle or buy a V-8.
-Jimmy
__________________
~99' Silverado z71 LS 5.3~
Alpine CDA-9830 Head Unit 2-JLW12 Subs Infinity Surrounds Too Many Extras 04' Yamaha YZF R6 Super Sport~ Liquid Silver with Black Ghost flames K&N Filter, Fender Delete Kit Aftermarket Mirror Shield Devil Carbon Fiber High Mount Pipe Power Commander III 02' Subaru WRX Turbo Sport Wagon Eibach Springs, Short Throw Shifter 17" Versus Campionato Wheels Wrapped in Pirrelli tires |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
Quote:
__________________
_______________________ 2000 Chevy Silverado 1500 Standard Cab, Short Bed 4X4 Perfection is SOO hard to strive for.... especially when you're already there.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
Quote:
__________________
Steve 2004 2WD 5.3 Xcab StepSide |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: mpg question
Quote:
The truck I have pictured gets anywhere between 17.5-18.6 just driving it on short trips. I really don't know what it will get on a trip, but I assume 19-20 mpg. And its a 92 model, but I do have 70 series Flowmasters, a TB spacer, and a bed cover.
__________________
**1966 Chevy II** ![]() 355 SBC, Turbo 400, 5.13 gear, IHRA Certified to 8.50 in the 1/4 Last Race (10-6-07) So its been awhile... Dial: 6.77, RT: -.0001, 60': 1.4360, 1/8th: 6.7942 @ 100.65 mph Fastest Pass of '07 (10-6-07) 60': 1.4360, 330': 4.3453, 1/8th: 6.7942 @ 100.65 mph 25 and in BIG TIME Debt Crew member #2 Deuce's Wild Racing: Take a Ride on the WILD SIDE
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: mpg question
Quote:
Yea... Surprisingly i never failed English class....
__________________
_______________________ 2000 Chevy Silverado 1500 Standard Cab, Short Bed 4X4 Perfection is SOO hard to strive for.... especially when you're already there.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have an 01' ext cab with the 5.3l. When the truck was new it would never do better than 18 mpg on the highway and that was at 65 mph. Have since installed a K&N FIPK and removed the screen from the MAF. I also installed a stainless Gibson catback sideswept dual exhaust system. Just went on a 120 mile trip. Cruise was set on 72 mph and I got 20.2 mpg. I haven't figured what I'm getting around town but as was mentioned earlier, the quick holeshots will kill your mpg. It's also very true that the smaller engines have to work harder and thus use more gas!
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mpg question
when you remove the screen from the maf does it help with any hp or mpg? how do you do it. do you know if it will mass with my warrenty?
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mpg question
Don't remove the MAF screen there is a tiny wire behind it that is extremely delicate, the screen is there to keep any debris from hitting the wire and damaging the sensor. Yes removing the screen will void the warranty on the sensor. If you want a MAF with improved airflow then buy a Granatelli from stillen they don't have a screen but they have a beefed up sensor wire.
Best my truck does is 17mpg |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
I have a 98 ext cab short bed with the hard cover and a 5.0, I see 17mpg in the city and 21 on highway. On long trips I see 23-24mpg @ 75-80mph. My trucks sweet spot is @ 75mph.
__________________
![]() My 1998 K1500 Stepside |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: mpg question
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: mpg question
The only mod I have done is the hard cover, everything else is bone stock. The cover is hard to see in this pic but they look really good, esecially if you spend a few extra $$$ and get the one like mine which has the lines that follow the hood lines.
__________________
![]() My 1998 K1500 Stepside |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|