-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical
Register FAQ Community
Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-22-2004, 05:56 AM
pro_am pro_am is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pro_am Send a message via Yahoo to pro_am
Okay, I'll get the "stroker" crank, but what rods do I get?

Since i'm getting a crank with a longer stroke, do I have to get longer rods? If so, how does that work? How long of rods to I need to get? Thanks for the help fella's/ladies.
jake
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2004, 11:56 AM
SaabJohan SaabJohan is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Okay, I'll get the "stroker" crank, but what rods do I get?

Longer stroke -> shorter rods and/or pistons with lower compression height.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2004, 04:52 PM
pro_am pro_am is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pro_am Send a message via Yahoo to pro_am
So, as long as the rods are just long enough to clear the crank weights, then I should be okay? Thanks for the help, I feel really stupid about this.
Jake
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2004, 06:31 PM
MagicRat's Avatar
MagicRat MagicRat is offline
Nothing scares me anymore
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
Re: Okay, I'll get the

Quote:
Originally Posted by pro_am
So, as long as the rods are just long enough to clear the crank weights, then I should be okay? Thanks for the help, I feel really stupid about this.
Jake
Thats simplifying things too much. The rods and/or pistons must also place the top of the pistons at the correct point at top dead center.
Any one who makes a stroker crank will also have recommendations for the correct rods and pistons. Use what they suggest.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2004, 11:19 AM
pro_am pro_am is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pro_am Send a message via Yahoo to pro_am
I talked to my guy at the machine shop, and he said that a stoker engine doesn't last more than a few years at best. So I decided to go with either a 350 or a 327, no sure which yet. Thanks for the help though. The stroker kit just seems like too much hassle.
Jake
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2004, 12:14 PM
MagicRat's Avatar
MagicRat MagicRat is offline
Nothing scares me anymore
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
Re: Okay, I'll get the "stroker" crank, but what rods do I get?

Telling us that it was a small bolck Chevy would help a lot.
You must mean a 383, which is a 350 with a 400 crankshaft in it.
This is an excellent combination and very common. I am at a loss as to why the machinest feels they would not last as long.
It depends on the application. For a truck or heavier car, a 383 is better. For a lighter car, the 350 is better since you can build it to rev more freely and make better top end power.
Also the 350 is cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2004, 02:11 PM
Evil Result Evil Result is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Evil Result
Rod angle might be the concern.... while increasing the stroke at the crank you will need to get shorter rods and pistons.... with the smeller rods the piston is pushed up against the cylinder wall harder causing excessive wear, basicly you want to keep your rod to stroke ratio at 1.7 or more (rod length/stroke).

http://www.chevytalk.com/tech/engine/rod_angle.html

This ratio also effects the acceleration of the pistion through the length of the stroke.

http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeA...ectingrods.pdf
__________________
I disregard my perceived image in the persuit of knowledge.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2004, 08:18 PM
timberdoodle timberdoodle is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ya pro am the 383 doesnt last very long at all. The larger stroke puts increased wear on the piston sidewall which gives it a short life span. Not only that but 350 is a much more common and easier to build block.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-26-2004, 07:49 PM
quaddriver quaddriver is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to quaddriver Send a message via MSN to quaddriver Send a message via Yahoo to quaddriver
yes and no. usually a stroker crank requires rods AND piston changes. and while longer rods are sexier, they cause the location of the wrist pin to put constraints on the piston top (compression height, ring intersection)

stroker engines tend not to last because they are built for one purpose: more power for racing. A proper rebuild, stroked or not should last just fine. (keeping or mind that removing metal from cyl walls and crank journals weakens the object - no way to get around that)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-26-2004, 11:33 PM
timberdoodle timberdoodle is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
nough said, stick with the 350, i have one built 30 over with vortec aluminum heads and am getting 370hp as ballpark.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts