-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Off-Topic
Register FAQ Community
Off-Topic Talk about anything other than cars.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-15-2004, 09:34 PM
metalhedskater's Avatar
metalhedskater metalhedskater is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to metalhedskater
2.5vs.3.0in.exhaust

Okay im still confused on what is the difference from 2.5 in. exhaust and 3 in. exhaust. I have read that 3 in. exhaust will give you turbo lag until you upgrade your turbo. and 2.5 is perfect for stock turbo. So will someone please tell me what my best bet would be. I have a 99 gst with 1g bov, dejontool uicp, aftermarket intake. I plan to put a boost controller on and a downpipe sometime within this year or next year.i wont be replacing the turbo anytime soon, unless it breaks on me. Also, what is the stock exhaust size?

Last edited by metalhedskater; 07-15-2004 at 10:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15-2004, 11:47 PM
kjewer1 kjewer1 is offline
AF - Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Smallest partof the stock exhaust is reportedly 1 7/8". I went to 2.5" only to upgrade again later. And even with the 2.5" on the 14b I got a lot of creep (larger exhaust gives you LESS lag, but more creep). On the stock turbo it doesnt really matter. It all really depends on your goals for the car. If you think a 3" is in your future you might as well get it now and prepare to deal with creep when you upgrade the turbo. Or if a 2.5" will support your goals (runs 11s often enough) just go for that and creep problems will be less, but will still need to be dealt with later.
__________________
Kevin Jewer
RWD Talon - 7.92 at 180
Mightymax - 10.7 at 125
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2004, 11:08 AM
metalhedskater's Avatar
metalhedskater metalhedskater is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to metalhedskater
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Thanks Kevin! but to get rid of the boost creep (too much boost or volatile boost) i read that you have to port the 02 sensor or something like that. Is that the only mod i would have to do when i get my exhaust? And with a 2.5 ill have less lag and less creep? If somehow dealt with the boost creep, would it be better to get the 3'' even if im not planning on upgrading the turbo soon? Please help....in dire need of it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2004, 01:26 PM
RiceRocket18's Avatar
RiceRocket18 RiceRocket18 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 819
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RiceRocket18
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

on top of what kevin said, 2.5 will give you better low end torque than 3" especially on the stock turbo.

yes, porting the O2 sensor is the way to fix the creep. and don't worry about porting it untill you have the exaust done. if it doesn't creep bad than there really is no need to port it. i have dual 2.5" and get both spike and creep when i drive. altho, it creeps just about enough @17psi so i don't plan on porting it untill later on when i upgrade. saves me the money for a BC now

yes, 2.5" will give you LESS lagg than 3" and LESS creep than 3".

depends on what your definition of SOON is. if soon means couple years later, i would just get the 2.5" now, personally i like having a good low end torque. and will plan on upgrade to 3" "after" i get a 16G.
__________________


06 Charger SRT-8 black.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2004, 01:44 PM
LandoAWD LandoAWD is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LandoAWD
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Easy now.

2.5in will induce lag, but you are correct about it creeping less.

As for poritng the O2 sensor, is this some newfangled mod?
__________________
Kris
2012 Genesis Coupe 2.0t
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2004, 02:42 PM
10.5sec92AWDTALON 10.5sec92AWDTALON is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Bigger exhaust does NOT give more lag, it gives less. Ideally no exhaust would be best on a turbo, the bigger and shorter the exhaust system the better.

I'm sure he means the O2 HOUSING. The stock O2 housing wastegate passage is very restrictive. Get an EVO O2 housing. Much better.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2004, 02:44 PM
LandoAWD LandoAWD is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LandoAWD
Re: Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10.5sec92AWDTALON

I'm sure he means the O2 HOUSING.
Ya think?

Sometimes my sarcasm isn't appreciated.
__________________
Kris
2012 Genesis Coupe 2.0t
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-16-2004, 02:50 PM
guitarXgeek's Avatar
guitarXgeek guitarXgeek is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 890
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to guitarXgeek
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

What's up with the whole "losing low-end with 3 inch exhaust" deal?

A.) When I'm racing, I don't spend much (if any) time below 4k rpm, so low-end isn't really that big of a deal! :P

B.) I have a hard time believing 3" exhaust will kill low-end torque, that just doesn't make much sense on a turbo car.

Someone feel free to help clear this up, I'm not exactly an expert at this
__________________

95 GSX
DSMlink, "50 Trim", and track times coming VERY SOON!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-16-2004, 02:51 PM
10.5sec92AWDTALON 10.5sec92AWDTALON is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Folks take the N/A exhaust theory and try to apply it to turbos. WRONGO!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-16-2004, 04:57 PM
RiceRocket18's Avatar
RiceRocket18 RiceRocket18 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 819
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RiceRocket18
Re: Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LandoAWD
Easy now.

2.5in will induce lag, but you are correct about it creeping less.

As for poritng the O2 sensor, is this some newfangled mod?

good looking out dude!. typo. meant 3" LESS lagg. obviously more air, faster spool up.

as for the low end torque thinging, it had already been discussed before. our encyclopedia Kevin wrote up a long article about that. let me see if i can find it.

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...low+end+torque

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...t=backpressure
__________________


06 Charger SRT-8 black.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-16-2004, 07:24 PM
BoostedSpyder's Avatar
BoostedSpyder BoostedSpyder is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BoostedSpyder Send a message via Yahoo to BoostedSpyder
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

the best exhaust for a turbo is no exhaust at all.

remember that. and get a GReddy Profec B spec-2. i had creep issues until i got that little baby. now i got rock solid boost control
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-16-2004, 09:42 PM
Shpyder's Avatar
Shpyder Shpyder is offline
Moderate moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

3" does decrease low end torque. I had a ricey dual exhaust that killed low end. lol. dont think ill do that to my GST but u never know, that ricer had to come out sometimes....and it big and grREeEEN and..ARRGHHHH HULKK SMAASSSHHHHH...
__________________


The daily driver. The weekend cruiser. The lazy shop hog.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-16-2004, 09:48 PM
ashah000's Avatar
ashah000 ashah000 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to ashah000
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

Shpyder- did it decrease it on your old car (a NT)

If so, that is what everone is saying. A 3" exhaust will lower low-end on a NT but it wont effect anything on a turbo.
__________________
For Sale 98 Eclipse GS, 5 spd
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-16-2004, 10:12 PM
Import2nr99's Avatar
Import2nr99 Import2nr99 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 671
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

sadly, I can't say I've ever had problems with creep. I have been running the profec B since day one. and it seems to be dead on (minus the small problem with not holding boost but I really think thats the wastegate, anyway) I wouldn't do things twice, if you're gonna upgrade, do it to the farthest possible extent so you don't have to do it again. saves time and money. I doubt that the negative effects of a 3 inch exhaust will outweigh the positive advantages it possesses.Good luck with your choice
__________________
V8's are like tampons, every pussy needs one!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-17-2004, 01:08 AM
metalhedskater's Avatar
metalhedskater metalhedskater is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to metalhedskater
Re: 2.5 vs. 3.0 in.

what do you guys mean about no exhaust for a turbo is the best exhaust?
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Mitsubishi > Eclipse/Talon/Laser > Off-Topic


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts