|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey Guys,
I wanted to get a Nitrous System to add some boost at times when I need it and I ran across these systems, from what I can tell they are new to the market and seem very safe from the specs provided from the makers of the products. Here they are first up is the VCN-2000 Computer Controlled Nitrous System http://www.venom-performance.com/nf/...2000.htm#v2000 ![]() Specs Quote:
![]() Specs Quote:
Does anyone here own either of the 2? Thankx, MAX P.S. Both are high priced so I know I will get some people telling me to "Just get a bigger motor or Get a turbo, etc.." But I would just like to have a boost once and awhile when I need it and not all the time, so we don't need to get in to that debate here.. Thankx.. ![]() . |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
They would both work equily well. The Venem is a dry system and the NOS is a wet system. Most people believe that a dry system is safer on an unbuilt motor but books I'v read suggest that if fuel is bumped up though the factory injectors its just as safe (like the venom does). The easyest to install would probably be the the NOS system. Remember not to use more than 50hp on a non built motor. Either one you choose will probably work great.
__________________
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I get around to it, I'm going to inject propane into my car instead of NOS or Venom. It burns cleaner, and is safer than either for an engine, now...of course its not as good as either...but each has its own usage. I'm not racing for money, so I dont really care.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
Zex
__________________
2002 Acura TL Type S 1991 Honda Crx Si |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
Quote:
Let us know how far you blow those pistons, ok?
__________________
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Venom vs NOS
Quote:
LMAO...
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ive always liked zex better. Just a personal opinion, i like most of their systems a lot better.
__________________
ZC stuff http://dh-racing.com http://www.thezcr.com/html/zcbook.php http://dmoore.com/crx/zc.htm http://www.jgenginedynamics.com/HOME%20PAGE http://www.theoldone.com/
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
Quote:
Why? . |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
Hey 91civichatch2571,
I would like to know why you think Zex is better, I have not thought of going with that system but if you have any thing to add to the reason why you like it I would really like to know. I have seen the Zex system but becuase the price was low I thought that maybe it was becuase it was a lesser grade system. Thankx, MAX . |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
zex is one of the safest and easiest kit's to install on the market.
it's almost like zex and honda go hand in hand when you think about zex you think about it in a honda most of the time. alot of people use it and trust it.
__________________
2002 Acura TL Type S 1991 Honda Crx Si |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
Quote:
Possible engine damage due to an excessive rich condition which in turn could cause EGT's to skyrocket. Propane injection on a diesel is drastically different than in a gas engine. Diesels run much leaner AFR's than gas so the added fuel can be beneficial. What you are proposing is like adding the extra fuel for nitrous but w/o the oxygen. If you do this you could have yourself one badass little BBQ that can make four 75MM diameter burgers at a time.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I never had nitrous in my car but i like zex the best because they really are the safest kits ive seen on ther market. Crazy easy to install and I think their always one step above NOS. Another brand i like is NX.
__________________
ZC stuff http://dh-racing.com http://www.thezcr.com/html/zcbook.php http://dmoore.com/crx/zc.htm http://www.jgenginedynamics.com/HOME%20PAGE http://www.theoldone.com/
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
i heard zex isnt as good as u mugs are saying, also wet vs dry, id go wet for sure, cause u wil run lean other wise and we all know lean isnt good, u need the extra fuel to compensate... but i say just buy my turbokit im selling and toss the spray lol
__________________
90 civic: JDM d15b CAI hp racing headers 4:2:1 custom 2 1/4 exhaust no cat vafc2 skunk2 adj cam gear B&M fpr B&M fpg tockico illumnia 5ways eibach sportline front & rear strut bars CF SIR hood Check out outofgames.net for your gaming needs! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
WTF propane? What the hell is that gonna do for u, they use propane in forklifts and all for gas milage, that shit isnt gonna do anything for ur car. Where did u come up with that idea anyways?
__________________
1991 Honda Civic DX Sedan |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Venom vs NOS
propane benefits deisel motor's, they make kit's for them just like nitrous kit's. you can even have propane injection and nitrous injection together. a company called bullydog makes kit's for deisel truck's.
dry is fine for small shot's 30-75hp anything above that I would say a wet system is necessary. A dry zex kit with 93 octane and proper plugs will run good and safe forever. Im not knocking the venom or n.o.s. system but that's alittle too much for a street car if you ask me with the intention of just a race here and there.
__________________
2002 Acura TL Type S 1991 Honda Crx Si |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|