|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Buying Q&A Ask a question, get an answer; it's that simple. Visit AutomotiveHelper.com for useful car buying tools and research. |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
07-07-2004, 04:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
300zx 2+2 vs teg gs-r vs stealth r/t turbo
Hey...
I know these are all gonna be around the same 8k-11k price range, so which do you think would be the best buy for LOOKS and RELIABILITY. SPEED is also a secondary major concern
__________________
'05 Mazda3, 2.3L 4dr. Xenons, sunroof, 17s, sport package, 6cd changer, STICK. Quote:
|
|
#4
07-07-2004, 08:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx 2+2 vs teg gs-r vs stealth r/t turbo
so basically +1 for every car so far. I'm personally leaning towards the stealth. But i have no idea whatsoever how the stealth is in terms of starting up everyday without a problem, considering that most stealth's i find will be 60k+ mileage. Anyone have experience?
btw 91300zxtt, love the sig,a nd the fact that you're not recommending the Z says alot
__________________
'05 Mazda3, 2.3L 4dr. Xenons, sunroof, 17s, sport package, 6cd changer, STICK. Quote:
|
|
#5
07-08-2004, 01:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300zx 2+2 vs teg gs-r vs stealth r/t turbo
If you're that worried about reliability go with the Integra. Honda motor will last you till the 200k mile mark as long as its maintained.
The 300ZX and old Stealth turbo will definitely be amoney pit. Believe me, Ive worked with these cars and the majority of the time these vehicles have been beaten on and youll be replacing parts all the time. And a GSR is a fine vehicle.... www.team-integra.net
|
|
#6
07-08-2004, 01:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx 2+2 vs teg gs-r vs stealth r/t turbo
haha i had a 300ZX man no problems. deffinately not a money pit, well at least not repairs anyway. the gs-r doesnt hold a candle to either of the other cars. now the type-r meh its a lil better, but still not really
|
|
#7
07-08-2004, 04:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
why do ricer boys feel like they have to bash 300ZX - a REAL sports car that has been discontinued now for 8 years - against a new-tech modded ricer to prove something?
it's like comparing between a stock '84 Ferrari Testarossa and fully suped up '04 WRX Sti.
__________________
I'm the greatest!
|
|
#8
07-08-2004, 08:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300zx 2+2 vs teg gs-r vs stealth r/t turbo
again, i dont care what is a REAL sports car, or anything else, just the criteria in the first post. Looks are subjective i guess, so amaybe i'll ask this question: How would you list the three cars here from most reliable to least? i.e. 1. teg 2. z 3. r/t
__________________
'05 Mazda3, 2.3L 4dr. Xenons, sunroof, 17s, sport package, 6cd changer, STICK. Quote:
|
|
#9
07-08-2004, 04:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
in terms of strictly reliability:
it would be integra and 300ZX 1. integra (only because parts are much cheaper) 2. 300ZX (engine is superb and the car doesn't malfunction often, but whenever the parts do however, things could be quite expensive depending where you go). 3. Stealth, by default.
__________________
I'm the greatest!
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
