|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
06-25-2004, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aftermarket intake manifold vs. Ported intake manifold
What would give better performance/air flow, an aftermarket intake manifold (eg. Skunk2), or a stock ported manifold. I have a 1995 Prelude Si if that makes any difference. Thanks for your help.
__________________
White 1995 Prelude Si 5-speed 107,000 miles AEM CAI AEM Pulleys DC Sports CC Header Carsound Hi-flow Cat 5Zigen Fireball Cat-back 17" wheels with 215/40/17 tires Custom paint on some interior (yellow) Currently in Progress: KMS (Honda-performance.com) Camshafts, Valve springs, and Retainers Skunk2 adjustable cam gears Wish me luck on this project, something always seems to go wrong. My 1995 Prelude Si 
|
|
#2
06-26-2004, 12:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Aftermarket intake manifold vs. Ported intake manifold
I have no idea, but I saw a guy that cut his in half (hotdog style
 ), ported it out, and welded the thing back together.. Pretty nice work too.. I'll have to try to find the link.
__________________
 Soon.. Cars: 1990 Nissan 300zx Twin TurboSold Cars: 1976 Jaguar XJ-S - Rear end Donor to Chev Pickup
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
