|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Who would win in the quarter? | |||
| 1995 Prelude Si |
|
3 | 20.00% |
| 1995 3000GT Base |
|
9 | 60.00% |
| It's a drivers race |
|
3 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Any opinions on who would win? 1995 Prelude Si (non-vtec 160 HP) with I/H/E, High flow cat, and pulleys vs a stock 1995 3000GT Base model (220 HP).
__________________
White 1995 Prelude Si 5-speed 107,000 miles AEM CAI AEM Pulleys DC Sports CC Header Carsound Hi-flow Cat 5Zigen Fireball Cat-back 17" wheels with 215/40/17 tires Custom paint on some interior (yellow) Currently in Progress: KMS (Honda-performance.com) Camshafts, Valve springs, and Retainers Skunk2 adjustable cam gears Wish me luck on this project, something always seems to go wrong. My 1995 Prelude Si |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
i think the 3000gt should be able to take you. if it was a vtec then it would be a drivers race.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Should be closer now with your mods, if your car was stock I don't think you would have had much of a chance. But now I say it's a driver race, I wouldn't underestimate the 3000GT Base with a 5-Speed though.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
3000gt baby all the way sorry man
Last edited by 91300zxtt; 06-14-2004 at 01:39 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 3000 is going to be a faster car - the only real hope you have is that the driver isn't any good.
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Having owned a 3000gt base (for about 2 years, then sold it) and ridden in my friend's prelude alot. I'm pretty sure the 3000gt pulls harder and has better brakes. I think my old front wheel drive 3000gt stuck to the road better too. But then again, I had some really good tires on it. The base model has less power but it also have less weight to compensate.
It is always a drivers race though. IMHO |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Mistake...the 3000GT Base has 168HP not 220HP.
The 220HP version is the 3000GT SL Then there's the 320HP version which is the VR4 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Quote:
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea, I know that the 3000GT Base model dropped to 161 HP in 1996 or whatever, but I know that the one I'm talking about is the 220 HP version, even though it's the base and not SL. Thanks for the responses though.
__________________
White 1995 Prelude Si 5-speed 107,000 miles AEM CAI AEM Pulleys DC Sports CC Header Carsound Hi-flow Cat 5Zigen Fireball Cat-back 17" wheels with 215/40/17 tires Custom paint on some interior (yellow) Currently in Progress: KMS (Honda-performance.com) Camshafts, Valve springs, and Retainers Skunk2 adjustable cam gears Wish me luck on this project, something always seems to go wrong. My 1995 Prelude Si |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
The base model had 164 horses but 200lb ft of torque and weighed only around 2750. A full 1000 pounds lighter than the AWD VR4 twin turbo. It's power to weight is more similar to an integra type R. It has less peak power, but a flatter powerband.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
Quote:
Why wont people listen.... Yogs already explained this. Till 1996 the base model carried the SL engine with 222HP 205 Torque. Plus it was lighter than the SL so it had a bit more advantage. 3000GT wins, hands down. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
3000Gt will own. period.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX (Sold) ![]() Act 2600, Apexi 3" downpipe, 3" exhaust, Hks 3"-5" muffler, Greddy TypeS BOV, Autometer Boost/Vac & Air fuel Gauge, Garrett T3/T4 60-1 turbo (Only boosting 15 psi) Tial 38mm Wastegate, Spearco FMIC, Greedy Profec B2, HKS Turbo Timer Type, Dejon Intake/K&N Air Filter, DSMLink, Eprom ECU, 950cc Fuel Injectors, Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump, Aeromotive FPR, Drilled/Slotted Rotors, B&M Short Shifter |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
a stock 3000GT is in the v-tec prelude territory of speed. so if your car is as fast as a v-tec. then it would be a drivers race.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Prelude vs 3000GT Base
I really don't think the SL is that fast. The non-VTEC Prelude is a good 400 pounds lighter than the 3000GT SL (I am going by www.intellichoice.com which uses manufacturer's data, so don't bitch at me). With the Prelude's mods, I'll call it a driver's race.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
that maybe true. but on the streetracing forums we got a few SL guys claiming high 14's stock with perfect driver. they know more about the car then me so i'll take their word for it.
edit: then again they could very well be freak SL's. i wish i had a factory freak.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|