|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#2
05-20-2004, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1991 Chevy Cavalier Engines! Please Reply......
I love the 3.1. How many miles is 331km???
__________________
This above all:To thine own self be true,and it must follow,as the night, the day,thou canst not then be false to any man.(William Shakespeare) 
|
|
#4
05-20-2004, 10:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1991 Chevy Cavalier Engines! Please Reply......
Personally I don't like the old 3.1/2.8 enignes. However I really do like the new 3400 engines, and the 3800, but that is beside the point. If they are taken care of they will be great engines.
__________________
Homer: No T.V. No Beer makes Homer go... Something Something or another.............. Marge: Go Crazy...... Homer: Don't mind if I do.....muahahahahahbwauauauauauauau  
|
|
#5
10-13-2004, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just bought a 91-2.2 litre rs/standard and it's been running great aside from the clutch acting up from time to time, but a month into having the car the engine dumped out all the oil while on the highway and i did'nt notice untill the enging started clunking like a mother focker and i went home and let it sit overnight.
The next day i refilled the oil and now there is no leak, but now im putting in another used engine cause the running dry of the engine cause a connecting rod or bearing problem or BOTH. Not sure, but it sounds so bad that i think a rod might come through the block one day??
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
