|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK what about these two cars....
A 1999 Chrysler Sebring Convertible 2.4L vs a 1999 Honda Prelude 2.2L VTEC. both stock. (assuming both cars are driven perfectly, to their max potential)
ps -if someone doesnt like me posting these vs things just tell me. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do believe that the lude would pull rather hard on the sebring.
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
prelude would whoop ass
__________________
![]() My new RHD project! Solid Crew (Circa 2002) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK what about these two cars....
Ok is it just me or does anyone else find something odd about the body design of the sebring that makes it look good?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
no, but the chicken running on the egg is mezmorising to me....
__________________
![]() My new RHD project! Solid Crew (Circa 2002) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
according to car-stats.com:
sebring-17.6 Prelude-15.5 TV- me too...
__________________
1997 Acura Integra GSR My honda may have less displacement than your coke bottle, but I'll race your coke bottle for $1000. Who says there's no replacement for displacement?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: OK what about these two cars....
that 2.4l motor has soooooooooo much potential, but not in a sebring, in a neon, bone stock, mid 14's
__________________
Quote:
![]() CHECK OUT MY CARS HERE! drag1320neon and 209neon's babys < 209 neon finished!> |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|