|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
04-23-2004, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
VVTL-i or V-Tec
I'm looking into to getting an RSX or an MR2. I'm posting this because I would love to get feedback from the wealth of knowledge that is automotive forums. Which one has the most potential to be screaming fast, but still a daily driver. We are talking about brand new cars here. If there is one year of either car that performed better in your opinions, please say so. Any intelligent input would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
#2
04-23-2004, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
First of all, you are comparing a mid engine 1.8 Liter four with rear wheel drive to a front engine front wheel drive 2.0 liter four. Are you debating the base RSX and MR2 or the Type S and MR2? overall, id get the RSX Type S, then Base RSX, then MR2. I dont like drifting at all, and i say this with the experience of 4 RX-7's ive had (3 first gen's and 1 third gen). Front wheel drive is more practical for everyday driving, plus either one has a major HP advantage, 18 in the case of the Base RSX (160HP/141TQ) and 58 HP in the Type S vs MR2 (200HP/142TQ). The Acura's have more standard features and a stronger power curve courtesy of the larger displacement. BTW, its i-VTEC DOHC for the RSX's (or VTEC in older integras and civics). The K series 2 liter engine already has massive aftermarket support and the engine itself has enourmous potential with just bolt on mods like cold air intake, header, and exhaust. The toyota roadster is a convertible though, but doesnt have nearly the aftermarket support or the 4 year warranty. I test drove an MR2 a few times and was not that impressed, plus its only a 5 speed. my RSX is a six speed manual. Overall, as a daily driver FWD is better to begin with. Maybe you should look into comparing a Celica and RSX, that would be a better matchup. the MR2 is moreso the competition of Mazda's MX-5 (Miata) RWD convertible. Personally i chose the Acura over the Celica, MR2, WRX, and Miata simply because i felt it has the best potential, so my recomendation is for the RSX (Type S preferably, base model has less aftermarket support)
__________________
Desert Silver Metallic RSX Type S Factory Spoiler PRICE-WISE Current Mods... Custom short ram intake Rear side window tint 35% AEM Pulley Kit, NIB C-West full lip kit, NIB Spoon/NGK Iridium Spk Plugs NIB (for sale) Denso Iridium Spk Plugs, on the way Spoon Sports grounding kit, NIB (for sale) Circle Earth grounding kit, on the way C-West style Carbon Fiber eyelids, NIB (NIB new in box) Future Mods... Injen Intake High flow cat and 5Zigen exhaust Audio system
|
|
#3
04-23-2004, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
i-VTEC > VVTL-i > VTEC > Every other knockoff
I'm not sure why i-VTEC is better than VVTL-i, but i've heard it in magazines, forums, etc. Get the RSX. The new MR2 sucks compared to the RSX.
|
|
#4
04-23-2004, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
TakimotoRacing - You're on ClubRSX, right?
|
|
#5
04-24-2004, 03:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The MR2 spyder has an optional 6 speed transmission. I have heard a lot more about handling for the MR2. And why would Lotus choose the VVTL-i for its Lotus Elise coming to the states? I guess I was already leaning towards the MR2, but everyone says go with the RSX Type S. I dont know why, its heavier which causes worse handling and braking. Its just hard picking between the two. Handling vs more power I guess?
|
|
#6
04-24-2004, 10:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
Well its not like the RSX is a bad handling car....keep in mind that the MR2 Spyder is a convertible so that loses structural rigidity....
And about the Lotus, A K20A (A better version of the engine in the type s - it is used in the japan/australia only type r version) was dropped into one (stock - 220hp) and it was out accelerating and out handling brand new ferraris....
|
|
#7
04-24-2004, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
i say get the MR2... it will have better handling due to its weight distribution...
the MR2 also looks nicer than the RSX, did you try asking the same question in the MR2 forum? if not, try, and see what kind of responses you'll get
|
|
#9
04-25-2004, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
IMO the new MR2 is ugly, except for the Veilside and Kaminari ones.
|
|
#10
04-25-2004, 12:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
This is a bit of a ridiculous comparison. The RSX, base or Type S has more hp, better tourque, equal/better fuel economy, larger displacement...
Also, if I remember correctly, the MR2 Spyder has an MSRP of around 24-25K???! And as far as being heavier is concerned (when it comes to the RSX and its performance)- you obviously have not driven one. The Type-S suspension/braking system is as tight as it gets- great control and feel. Performance stats aside, I personally find the RSX to be far more aesthetically pleasing. If you like the MR2, get one-but it really can't hold a candle to the RSX-S.
__________________
 I've got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell...
|
|
#11
04-25-2004, 02:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
Yeah, what RSX-S777 said. Plus the RSX has a better aftermarket.
|
|
#12
04-25-2004, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
true, i haven't driven either car, i just thought that a car with a mr layout would handle better than a car with an ff layout...
however imo the RSX is quite ugly like most new honda cars
|
|
#13
04-25-2004, 06:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
Quote:
__________________
I've got a fever. And the only prescription is more cowbell...
|
|
#15
04-26-2004, 10:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: VVTL-i or V-Tec
If you'd like to compare a Honda vehicle to the MR2, I'd suggest the S2000. Both convertibles, both RWD. MR2 does what, 220hp, S2000 does somewhere around 240. Of course, isn't the starting price for an S2000 around $30,000?
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
everyone has their own opinion about how new cars look
