|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My Question Is What Is Better For A B16 A Superchager Or A Turbo Kit???
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
thats a matter of preference what is this car going to be a daily driver or u going to use for racing only?
__________________
91 Civic CX - Sold 94 Accord EX - Sold 94 Integra LS - Cleaning it up |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
racing only!!
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
turbo always better, does not take away power like the super charger does...daily driven you can always go with a super charger but you might regret getting it when you lose quick to a turbo car...lol
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
ok thanks for the info ok guys
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
no problem
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
Quote:
__________________
ZC stuff http://dh-racing.com http://www.thezcr.com/html/zcbook.php http://dmoore.com/crx/zc.htm http://www.jgenginedynamics.com/HOME%20PAGE http://www.theoldone.com/
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
It's belt driven. It takes power to spin the belt.
__________________
I get paid to read e-mails when I'm bored....are you bored? http://hits4pay.com/members/index.cgi?doug684 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
Quote:
Argument for and against superchargers: Superchargers are capable of providing power where small displacement Honda engines need it most; down low. Because they are powered by the engine's powertrain, it spools up right away and provides good consistent throttle response. Because it is powered by the engine's powertrain, it is also limited by the amount of horsepower the engine can produce. Argument for and against turbos: Turbochargers are powered by exhaust gases. It takes wasted energy and uses it create momentum to spool up the turbo. Whether your car is 130 HP or 300 HP w/o the turbo, if the car can produce exhaust then it can power the turbo. I tend to call the turbo "The Great Equalizer". The turbo is only limited by how much horsepower the bottom end can handle before buckling. The main downside to turbos is that they take time to spool up. The bigger the turbo, the longer it will take. Turbos are more efficient for mid-high rpm hp & torque. Both systems create heat and must be monitored carefully for detonation. So, basically, what it comes down to is where do you want the power most, down low, or up high, (i.e. fast launch or superior overall momentum all the way to the redline)? |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh yeah,
Since you have a B16 which is a VTEC motor, I am inclided to recommend the supercharger to complement the high horsepower VTEC system with good low-end grunt. However, if you had a non-VTEC engine like a B18B LS motor, I would recommend a turbo to complement the B18B's good low-end torque with high horsepower momentum |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
I tend to agree...with the supercharger you could have the low end power and not have to wait for a turbo to spool up.
__________________
***90 Civic EX 4 Door*** ![]() Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
its all preference, take the Old One from ENDYN, he has a supercharged Si that has like 480 HP (of course no one else can get the SC for now, but eventually
)
__________________
The Civic is gone... The Camry never ran... The Chevy is here to stay... The Ultimate Honda Engine
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
alot of people talk about superchargers for b16s in EFs but i hardly ever seen any of these setups.
i see so many b16 turbo setups. must be for a reason.
__________________
As American As A Burrito! USDM 4 life! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
Quote:
if you have a b16 and want to go forced induction i would say supercharger or nitrous but why not just go all motor if you already have a high compression high revving motor?
__________________
2002 Acura TL Type S 1991 Honda Crx Si |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger
this taken from homemadeturbo.com forums.....
1991 Honda Crx SI Turbo B16a w/ ITR Pistons (stock/stock) ITR Intake manifold ITR Cams JG Cam Gears Custom Turbo setup running 14psi T3 .60/.63 2.5DP w/ 3 exhaust / 2.5 charge pipes Custom Coach IC RPS Turbo Clutch Hondata 277whp / 211tq thats pretty impressive if you ask me. |
| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|