-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee
Register FAQ Community
'88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-25-2004, 02:21 PM
Sargento69 Sargento69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Sargento69
Exclamation Turbo Vs Supercharger

My Question Is What Is Better For A B16 A Superchager Or A Turbo Kit???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2004, 02:57 PM
Bilson8tor's Avatar
Bilson8tor Bilson8tor is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 539
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bilson8tor
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

thats a matter of preference what is this car going to be a daily driver or u going to use for racing only?
__________________
91 Civic CX - Sold
94 Accord EX - Sold
94 Integra LS - Cleaning it up
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:00 PM
Sargento69 Sargento69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Sargento69
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

racing only!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:00 PM
YZ125rider21's Avatar
YZ125rider21 YZ125rider21 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YZ125rider21 Send a message via Yahoo to YZ125rider21
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

turbo always better, does not take away power like the super charger does...daily driven you can always go with a super charger but you might regret getting it when you lose quick to a turbo car...lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:01 PM
Sargento69 Sargento69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Sargento69
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

ok thanks for the info ok guys
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2004, 03:04 PM
YZ125rider21's Avatar
YZ125rider21 YZ125rider21 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YZ125rider21 Send a message via Yahoo to YZ125rider21
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

no problem
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:24 PM
91civichatch2571's Avatar
91civichatch2571 91civichatch2571 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 91civichatch2571
Re: Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americanfeagle03
turbo always better, does not take away power like the super charger does...daily driven you can always go with a super charger but you might regret getting it when you lose quick to a turbo car...lol
How exactly does a supercharger take away power?
__________________
ZC stuff
http://dh-racing.com
http://www.thezcr.com/html/zcbook.php
http://dmoore.com/crx/zc.htm
http://www.jgenginedynamics.com/HOME%20PAGE
http://www.theoldone.com/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:32 PM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

It's belt driven. It takes power to spin the belt.
__________________
I get paid to read e-mails when I'm bored....are you bored?
http://hits4pay.com/members/index.cgi?doug684
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:44 PM
ahzab33 ahzab33 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by 91civichatch2571
How exactly does a supercharger take away power?
Superchargers are classified as positive displacement components, i.e. it takes engine power to operate them. Its kinda like your A/C, power steering, etc. The more the engine revs, the more power available for the supercharger.

Argument for and against superchargers: Superchargers are capable of providing power where small displacement Honda engines need it most; down low. Because they are powered by the engine's powertrain, it spools up right away and provides good consistent throttle response. Because it is powered by the engine's powertrain, it is also limited by the amount of horsepower the engine can produce.

Argument for and against turbos: Turbochargers are powered by exhaust gases. It takes wasted energy and uses it create momentum to spool up the turbo. Whether your car is 130 HP or 300 HP w/o the turbo, if the car can produce exhaust then it can power the turbo. I tend to call the turbo "The Great Equalizer". The turbo is only limited by how much horsepower the bottom end can handle before buckling. The main downside to turbos is that they take time to spool up. The bigger the turbo, the longer it will take. Turbos are more efficient for mid-high rpm hp & torque.

Both systems create heat and must be monitored carefully for detonation. So, basically, what it comes down to is where do you want the power most, down low, or up high, (i.e. fast launch or superior overall momentum all the way to the redline)?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-25-2004, 04:54 PM
ahzab33 ahzab33 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh yeah,

Since you have a B16 which is a VTEC motor, I am inclided to recommend the supercharger to complement the high horsepower VTEC system with good low-end grunt. However, if you had a non-VTEC engine like a B18B LS motor, I would recommend a turbo to complement the B18B's good low-end torque with high horsepower momentum
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:01 PM
90civicracer's Avatar
90civicracer 90civicracer is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,348
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 90civicracer
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

I tend to agree...with the supercharger you could have the low end power and not have to wait for a turbo to spool up.
__________________
***90 Civic EX 4 Door***



Quote:
Ace$nyper: yea it did woo woo 4500 posts i should be ashamed *kills self*
90civicracer: haha you killed yourself you got
Ace$nyper: OMFG LOL that might be the funniest thing you EVER posted
bwhahahaha
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:17 PM
Jay eS Iye's Avatar
Jay eS Iye Jay eS Iye is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,017
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jay eS Iye
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

its all preference, take the Old One from ENDYN, he has a supercharged Si that has like 480 HP (of course no one else can get the SC for now, but eventually )
__________________
The Civic is gone...
The Camry never ran...
The Chevy is here to stay...

The Ultimate Honda Engine
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:33 PM
optimuscivic's Avatar
optimuscivic optimuscivic is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 575
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alot of people talk about superchargers for b16s in EFs but i hardly ever seen any of these setups.

i see so many b16 turbo setups. must be for a reason.
__________________
As American As A Burrito!
USDM 4 life!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:53 PM
civicHBsi91's Avatar
civicHBsi91 civicHBsi91 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,972
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to civicHBsi91
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimuscivic
i see so many b16 turbo setups. must be for a reason.
yea b16's are cheap and everyone wants a turbo, i dont agree with turbo b16's unless they are fully built, their compression is too high and any b16 we get for an ef obd0...im sure had seen its share of lead foot drivers and vtec wompers and im sure they are beat in some how some way and couldent hold much boost without failure

if you have a b16 and want to go forced induction i would say supercharger or nitrous but why not just go all motor if you already have a high compression high revving motor?
__________________
2002 Acura TL Type S
1991 Honda Crx Si
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-25-2004, 06:20 PM
91civicDXdude's Avatar
91civicDXdude 91civicDXdude is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 91civicDXdude
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

this taken from homemadeturbo.com forums.....

1991 Honda Crx SI
Turbo B16a w/ ITR Pistons (stock/stock)
ITR Intake manifold
ITR Cams
JG Cam Gears
Custom Turbo setup running 14psi
T3 .60/.63
2.5DP w/ 3 exhaust / 2.5 charge pipes
Custom Coach IC
RPS Turbo Clutch
Hondata

277whp / 211tq

thats pretty impressive if you ask me.
__________________
What makes you think you should be spoonfed?

http://4thgencivic0.tripod.com
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: **$30 Shipped** 1995 Eclipse Turbo Automatic Transmission Motor Mount thakid22 Classifieds 0 12-17-2010 05:32 AM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts