-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > 240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars)
Register FAQ Community
240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars) The original Z cars - ones that started it all.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-21-2004, 02:28 PM
gigglesnirt's Avatar
gigglesnirt gigglesnirt is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gigglesnirt
single turbo faster than twin turbo?

i was at a friends party and we were talking about cars, and i mentioned my plans on getting a twin turbo 300z, but he said i should go with a single turbo, because it will be faster, and he gave examples like a 1000hp supra was twin turbo and they made it into a single turbo and got more power, or something like that, im not to sure, but would a single turbo be the better thing to get, or is the twin turbo what i should stay with.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2004, 04:16 PM
jbanach77 jbanach77 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbanach77
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

one larger turbo is much more efficent than two smaller turbos
__________________
thanks

jimmy
the only thing i want is my daughter, cars lose everytime to her
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2004, 05:29 PM
gigglesnirt's Avatar
gigglesnirt gigglesnirt is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gigglesnirt
so....

then getting a single turbo would be both cheaper and faster?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2004, 11:13 PM
freakonaleash1187's Avatar
freakonaleash1187 freakonaleash1187 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to freakonaleash1187 Send a message via MSN to freakonaleash1187
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

stock, a twin-turbo will mostly be faster than a single turbo. but if you go with one bigger turbo, you will also most likely have more lag. the bigger that turbo, the more the lag. so if you do 1/4 mile racing, two smaller turbos would probably be better. but if you like to go fast on the highway, a bigger turbo would probably be faster.
__________________


ZedEx Crew Member #2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2004, 12:15 AM
gigglesnirt's Avatar
gigglesnirt gigglesnirt is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to gigglesnirt
ok thank you
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2004, 11:53 AM
AcesHigh's Avatar
AcesHigh AcesHigh is offline
Prelude Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AcesHigh
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

Twin sequential turbos will spool much more quickly than a single large turbo, but will produce less power. It's a tradeoff.
__________________

1993 Mazda Rx-7 Touring
Ricer Extraordinaire
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2004, 03:36 PM
Zoso's Avatar
Zoso Zoso is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zoso
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

Well think about this. There are two turbos on the VG30DETT for a reason, same thing with the MKIV GTE, RB26DETT, 13B etc. One turbo to handle low presure, one to handle high. Like someone said already, if you are planning on drag racing, a TT would be better... But if your planning on drag racing, you chose the wrong car anyways. Z's are best for handling the curves. I think a single turbo would be fun, one HUGE kick in would be something. But realistically... Would it fit? Where would it go? There is plenty of room down near the bottom of the bay, hence why they put the turbos down there. But where would the SINGLE fit? The exhaust manifolds would have to be the same length, same path's of flow, it would be hard as hell to fabricate. Has there been a kit made already? Never seen one. But other engines such as the RB, or GTE engine, inline engines, are easy to single turbo, because the engine only has one exhaust manifold. Anyone else have an opinion here? Peace foo's
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2004, 06:08 PM
ZXTT's Avatar
ZXTT ZXTT is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoso
Well think about this. There are two turbos on the VG30DETT for a reason, same thing with the MKIV GTE, RB26DETT, 13B etc. One turbo to handle low presure, one to handle high. Like someone said already, if you are planning on drag racing, a TT would be better... But if your planning on drag racing, you chose the wrong car anyways. Z's are best for handling the curves. I think a single turbo would be fun, one HUGE kick in would be something. But realistically... Would it fit? Where would it go? There is plenty of room down near the bottom of the bay, hence why they put the turbos down there. But where would the SINGLE fit? The exhaust manifolds would have to be the same length, same path's of flow, it would be hard as hell to fabricate. Has there been a kit made already? Never seen one. But other engines such as the RB, or GTE engine, inline engines, are easy to single turbo, because the engine only has one exhaust manifold. Anyone else have an opinion here? Peace foo's

Im pretty sure the turbos in the 300zx are not sequential. TT setups are best used on a V engine config ie a V6 or V8.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-23-2004, 09:14 PM
Zoso's Avatar
Zoso Zoso is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zoso
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

Gotcha. I remember my buddy talking about how they are in fact sequential... Anyone who knows for sure? Peace foo's
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-29-2004, 11:43 AM
rizzspeed's Avatar
rizzspeed rizzspeed is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 200
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to rizzspeed
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

they are NOT sequential!!!
You of all ppl, I would of thought, should know that, Zoso!!
the TT is setup as basically 2 engines in the same bay. Hence the dual throttle bodies, dual exhausts, TWIN TURBOS!
Ugh....
sequential means in sequence. One after the other, one feeding the other. if the turbos are not directly connected to each other how can they be sequential?
At least you got one thing right there, Zoso. The MKIV Supra is easily converted to single turbo because the exhaust manifold is located in one spot on one side of the engine, which is inherit to an Inline 6. Because of the V nature of the VG30DETT, a single turbo would prove difficult not impossible, but definitely very difficult. It's been done, but at the cost of a brand new intake manifold, brand new exhaust manifolds and so on. Not impressive and definitely not pretty.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-29-2004, 01:51 PM
Zoso's Avatar
Zoso Zoso is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zoso
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

Haha, shaddap Riz. I didnt think about that, for some reason it slipped my mind that the plenum has two throttle bodies???? WTF, Im going crazy . Well damn, John Penlington single turbo'd his VG35DE... From what I could read, it did NOT look simple at all. I would rather break my arm than even attempt that project. Haha. Peace foo's
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-01-2004, 08:51 PM
solidtimh solidtimh is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you have tons of money, do anything you want. but, from a level headed working class guy, i say stick with the tt. it would be cheaper to get two skyline turbos (which fit like a glove), than to get one huge turbo, and have to deal with all the fabrication. two skyline turbs would be more than enough power.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-01-2004, 09:28 PM
Zoso's Avatar
Zoso Zoso is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zoso
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

... Not exactly. Its a little harder done than said. Would by no means fit like a glove, Personally If I had enough, I would just drop in a damn RB26DETT. My boss is making his 240sx AWD with an R32 GTR drivetrain... Its not all that hard. Peace foo's
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-20-2004, 08:03 PM
Z_animal Z_animal is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 85
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: single turbo faster than twin turbo?

usable power is what huge single vs twin comes down to. supra's with t-88 are trailer queens, and have no useable hp. the turbo spools at like 6.5krpm. there is one person that i know of that has a single turbo z, joel(pa) on www.twinturbo.net and he made some good numbers. but fast cannot be degsignated by single or twin setup, it's kinda how you wanna use it. furthermore a single on a z while innovative very costly.
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: **$30 Shipped** 1995 Eclipse Turbo Automatic Transmission Motor Mount thakid22 Classifieds 0 12-17-2010 06:32 AM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > 240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars)


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts