|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
02-17-2004, 10:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ram air vs. cold air
I was wondering which system would work more efficiently. the ram air or cold air. I know the cold air is less expensive, but the ram air looks so much more cooler. I don't think it's possible, but could you run both. I was also wondering if anyone had dyno results after installing the CDC shaker scoop ram air system. Thanks for any input.
|
|
#2
03-23-2004, 08:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ram air vs. cold air
Ram aire is a myth. It doesn't exist and is only a selling point to people who actually believe that there is RAM air for your car. I personally stick with the k&N kits or older cold air kits they have on the market. Just my thoughts. Plus the fact that I read an article that explained even mathmatically that RAM air is a myth.
__________________
(\/)ichael
|
|
#3
03-23-2004, 10:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, you have to be going something like 180 mph to even start to notice a ram air effect. Also, neither will gain you any noticable hp, they are mainly just for looks. Like vortec said stick with either a K&N setup or a fenderwell CAI.
__________________
92 Mustang GT, 347 Stroker(Forged Steel Crank/Rods-Balanced, Forged Alum Dished Pistons), B50 Block, Track Heat Intake, Twisted Wedge Heads w/ Stage 3 port/polish, 80mm C&L MAF, FMS 30# Inj., BBK AFPR, Trick Flow Stage 2 Cam, Trick Flow 1.6R Rockers, BBK EL-CC Headers, MAC O.R. H-Pipe, Flowmaster Cat-Back, Accufab 75mm TB, MAC CAI, BBK Pulleys, Griffin Alum Radiator, Mark 8 Fan, MSD Pro-Billet Distributor; AOD, Dynamic 3300 L-U Converter, B&M Trans Cooler; 3:73 gears.
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
