i NEED to race an s2000

got v-tec? · #1 01-25-2004, 02:46 AM

ive been dying to race an S2000 win or lose. ive had 2 chances and they both didnt want to race, im sick of old people bying fast cars and not going fast in them! whats the point of bying a trans am, vette,m3,s2000,saleen mustangs. hopefully ill find one next summer at the track. anywase i think it would be a good race the s2000 has 204whp and i forgot the wtq probably like 140 and weighs2810 and i got 188whp and 133wtq and weigh about 2350 so who do you guys think would win??? the s2000 is the one im really interested in but what about the rx8, 350z, srt-4, what do you think would happen in those races as well?
p.s i would not be useing n20. 188whp is w/out nitrous.

89Turbo944 · #2 01-25-2004, 02:57 AM

The S200 would be close MABY(depending on the driver)
RX8 would MABY (also depending on the driver)
350Z would own you
SRT-4 would own you(these things are bludie fast)

If you were to race an S2000 on the track you would most definetly lose to it. As well as the rest of the cars. They are all track onsters right from factory. The 350Z is amazing on the track, as well as the very sharp handling RX8 and S2000. The SRT-4 would not fair as well on the track as the others bout it could hold its own.

ibsixubnine03 · #3 01-25-2004, 05:37 AM

ur pretty dumb...stock rx8s and 350zs cant touch a srt-4 if they wanted to...

89Turbo944 · #4 01-25-2004, 05:43 AM

bad idea to call someone dumb on a public forum , quick way to get banned. On a track, WITH TURNS an SRT-4 is not very well suited. I have seen it in person at a race track. It is bluddie fast in a straight line. But the RX8 can out handle the SRT-4 and so can a 350Z. And the 350Z can do low 13's on the strip. So im not quite sure what you are talking about. The 350Z can also out handle the SRT-4.

Im not sure about the RX8 in the 1/4 but it isnt that slow, and it could definetly take it on a track.

PS by track i mean not a 1/4 strip, i mean a track like the ones with turns.

ibsixubnine03 · #5 01-25-2004, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 89Turbo944

bad idea to call someone dumb on a public forum , quick way to get banned. On a track, WITH TURNS an SRT-4 is not very well suited. I have seen it in person at a race track. It is bluddie fast in a straight line. But the RX8 can out handle the SRT-4 and so can a 350Z. And the 350Z can do low 13's on the strip. So im not quite sure what you are talking about. The 350Z can also out handle the SRT-4.

Im not sure about the RX8 in the 1/4 but it isnt that slow, and it could definetly take it on a track.

PS by track i mean not a 1/4 strip, i mean a track like the ones with turns.

first off...ur dumb

no 350z stock is gunna run 13s...period
rx8s arent half as bad as rx7s
and $ for $, theres nuthin u could do to either of em to make em faster 1/4 mile than an srt-4

89Turbo944 · #6 01-25-2004, 06:05 AM

gee the sites Administrator has a 350Z that he ran a 13.69 with a bad tranny and you are teling me that they cant. Oops your wrong.

I never mentioned an RX7, but yes it is better tna the RX8 in my opinion. And the RX8 does mid to low 14's on the strip.

And the SRT-4 does 14.2 stock. So umm, yes both of them could beat an SRT-4.

Looks like the SRT-4 isnt the best out there. O and if you like you can argue with the site admin about how fast his stock track eddition 350z is cuase he will gladly converse with you about it.

The SRT-4 is fast, no dought about it but there are faster cars and the 350Z, S2000 and RX8 are some of them.

Im guessing you own an SRT-4. Well if you do, you dont own the best car out there. My 300Zx can beat your car, a guy on here has beat one in his Cav-e, and many other SRT-4's have fallen.

HTRtech · #7 01-25-2004, 01:39 PM

The only thing the SRT-4 has versus all of the bad ass cars talked about is price. the base price on them is ungodly low but guess what they are all getting recalled because they are not truly street legal. they are fast but so are the others (350Z A+, RX8 A+, S2000 A+++ and by the looks of it this guys 300Z TT). SRT-4 is not worth all the hype it gets. it is a good car but it is not a roadster or RWD! nuf said

89Turbo944 · #8 01-25-2004, 01:43 PM

Y arent they street legal?

But most everyone I know gives the car props. Uts fast, but it seems like a few guys on herer thing its faster than everything. Im sorry but the info dosent lie. There are faster cars. But the SRT-4 is quite amazing IMO.

Gradyman25 · #9 01-25-2004, 03:14 PM

aparently people like ibsix that drive gmc sonoma's are experts about all cars that they do not own and probablly have never driven

89Turbo944 · #10 01-25-2004, 03:16 PM

LOL

Thats the impression i got from him as well. But he seems to not be to intrested in talking baout the subject any more.

O well

ibsixubnine03 · #11 01-25-2004, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 89Turbo944

LOL

Thats the impression i got from him as well. But he seems to not be to intrested in talking baout the subject any more.

O well

sry, i jus had better shit to do than sit on here all day...

again first off, u...r...dumb

if u read wut i said again, i wrote DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR, NONE OF UR CARS CAN TOUCH A SRT-4, PERIOD...

for the price of a 350z...u can get a srt-4, n still have like 10-15 thousand for mods...sry take ur 350 back to the drawing boards

Crippy · #12 01-25-2004, 08:21 PM

you would need 10 - 15 grand just to make your srt4 look half as good as the fore mentioned cars . they are fugly as hell !! I dont care if it has a turbo , its still a neon !! that would be like ford putting a turbo in a probe and making 260 hp , it would still be an ugly ass probe that moves fast !! Ask some fine ass honey's if they would rather ride in a srt4 or a rx8/s2000/350 z ..........

89Turbo944 · #13 01-25-2004, 08:38 PM

no amount of money can get an SRT-4 to look close to what a 350Z or RX8 or even an S2000.

By the way an SRT-4 sells for about 24000 and a 350Z sells for 26000. I checked with the dealers sites.

So a 2000$ difference, umm i think i would get the 350Z and walk all over the SRT-4, it would be worth the extra 2000.

And if im such a dumb person, y is it that i make a living fixing cars that cost as much as homes??? Seems kinda strange to me.

But if you said it, then it must be true.

gnushit · #14 01-25-2004, 08:41 PM

why aren't you guys putting the evo and sti in the catagory? (just curious)

and btw, my ex co-workers (who's 26 and 22 years old) own a 2002 m3 and 2001 s2k.

89Turbo944 · #15 01-25-2004, 08:51 PM

WEll if you would like to add the STi and EVo then they will be added.

So for the same or near the same money you can ppick up an EVo. They are faster, and handle better, launch better. As does the STi.

Do one here was trying to diss the SRT-4, but now your arguing about it has made it look that way. You need to understand that there are better vehicles out there in the same price range.

PS: PT Cruiser Turbo and SRT-4, Same thing, the SRT-4 just has 10 more hp, and a different body. O and the PT cruiser is built on the same platform as the SRT-4.

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD