Horse VS. Bull

[freakonaleash1187]

if you havent figured it out yet, i want to see which company people like better, ferrari or lamborghini. if this comparo has been done already i didnt find it. i think that these two companies are in very good competition so i wanna see which one people like more.

if u have looked at some of my other posts or my avatar, then you know i will side with ferrari. i will sum my opinion into one sentence (i will also say my opinion on other people's post, but jus for now). ferrari has elegance and power wrapped in one package. some of you may say that lamborghini does too, but IMO i think that ferrari looks way better than any lambo.

[Neutrino]

as Enzo said...they need to stick to making tractors




















ok i'm just kiddin....lambo makes great cars even though since audi took over they seem to be concentrating more on driver comfort than performance resulting in an overweight understeering happy murcielago(as far as supercars go)

az Jimmy said ze germans ruined ze lambo

ferrari on the other hand never lost its passion...it just continues to make legend after legend

[Polygon]

There are a few Lamborghinis that I like, but there are a shit load of Ferraris that I love. I think you can guess which one I like more. Let's just say that Chrysler is my favorite manufacture with Ferrari in a VERY close second.

[Mr Payne]

The racing story alone really tells the whole tale.

[syr74]

In the late seventies/part of the eighties when Ferrari lost thier way for a time, the Bull probably had the edge IMO. However, that is the only time that Ferrari was being out done by their cross town rival.

The sixties and current day are no comparison IMO.

[crayzayjay]

Lamborghini hasnt competed (and succeeded) on a global scale like Ferrari did (and continues to do). I'm skeptical of a company that makes supercars and doesn't have a significant involvement in international motorsport. With VW's dinero behind them i hope that will change for Lambo. I doubt it though...
Anyway, the racing history makes Ferrari the automatic winner for me, that, and the small matter of a magnificent back catalogue of legendary road cars.

I do however hugely appreciate Lambo's existence, they've made some of the most outrageous cars in the history of automobiles (Miura, Countach, Diablo), and i personally disagree with the widely-held notion that Audi has ruined Lambo. Yes, the styling (Murci) is not as extravagant as previous Lambo's but it's said to be a much better drive than its predecessors. And that can't be bad, now can it? And finally there's a small Lambo (Gallardo) capable of taking on the 911Turbo and small Ferrari (360).
Besides, stylistically at least i think Ferrari is losing its way a little (did a blind monkey style the 612?) whereas i like the Gallardo (a lot). On the flipside, Lambo interiors have become a lot less extravagant which is a bad thing, as extravagance is the whole point of a Lamborghini. Maybe ze Germans are ruining Lambo after all..

In conclusion Ferrari > Lamborghini but as the latter continues to churn out good cars the gap will begin to narrow

[GTStang]

If I was a rich fuck and looking at buying a Ferrari or a Lambo. I would buy the Lambo just because I like to be a little bit different from all the other pretentious pricks. Plus there was nothing sexier than a Countach in it's day IMO.

[TexasF355F1]

I love both brands. However, if I had to choose just one it would have to be Ferrari. Just look at my name. I think it says it all.

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by TexasF355F1

I love both brands. However, if I had to choose just one it would have to be Ferrari. Just look at my name. I think it says it all.

ah yes the F355 lamborghini...very fast car











just j/k