-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-08-2004, 09:33 AM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
me vs. current gen mustang GT

well last night i was driving home from my friends house. i was cruising when i saw this silver GT. i didn't pay much attention to him. but when we hit the toll booth i sorta guned it becuase i wanted to cut this slow ass ford taurus off becuase he was blocking my lane for hte last mile or so. anyways the mustang must've mis thought something and he was pacing me for like 2 miles. i had an idea that he wanted to race but by lookin at the driver he looked too old to be a street racer ( in hte mid 30's ) i speed up to 80 and he kept on pacing me and kept on acelerating, but he wasn't acelerating very fast from 80 so i wasn't 100% he wanted to race. then we finally locked eyes and i'm like oh shit. so he jumped 2 cars on me becusae i wasn't expecting anything and was still cruising. then i'm like fuck!!! he is racing!! so i downshifted to 4th, redlined 4th, passed him easily then poped into 5th back fired after i passed him by the time i cut off i was around 2-3 cars ahead and i was about to him my governor ( 120mph ) and i figured there was no point. anyways i was surprised at how easily i passed him. i just passed him like he how i would normally cut off a slow moving traffic. and yes it was a GT beucsae it had the GT wheels and the twin tail pipes. whether or not its a auto shouldn't matter too much from a roll at 80mph either.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2004, 09:37 AM
TheLogikal1's Avatar
TheLogikal1 TheLogikal1 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TheLogikal1
Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

you freakin rock tat.

good kill.
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l
5-speed quattro


1994 lexus sc300 (dead)
tein cs
kenwood flip out 7'' screen



1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead)
GP Sports Spec-D exhaust
Custom Carbon Fiber Intake
17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos




hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2004, 10:24 AM
hot_red_z28 hot_red_z28 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to hot_red_z28 Send a message via AIM to hot_red_z28
Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by TatII
anyways i was surprised at how easily i passed him. i just passed him like he how i would normally cut off a slow moving traffic. and yes it was a GT beucsae it had the GT wheels and the twin tail pipes. whether or not its a auto shouldn't matter too much from a roll at 80mph either.

Nice kill...

It's quite believable, most late model GT's dyno at or below 215hp to the rear wheels. They are prolly also a bit heavier than your nissan...
__________________

My Project Write-Up
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2004, 04:46 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
they only dyno at less then 215 at the wheels? wow i thought they said those cars were underated. becuse i mean from what i heard from this forum. a good drive can get it to do 14.1 stock and that thing weights 3200lbs. so i think 260hp is alittle underated for that E.T. but judging fromw hat you said with only 215 at the wheels. i guess its dead on with the factory rating.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2004, 04:56 PM
hot_red_z28 hot_red_z28 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to hot_red_z28 Send a message via AIM to hot_red_z28
Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

There was one on Horsepower TV last summer. I think it was a 2000ish GT. Stock it only pulled like 187rwhp on the dyno. I have heard of others getting as high as 210-215rwhp. I'm sure there are a few freaks out there, but generally speaking, that's what your lookin at...
__________________

My Project Write-Up
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2004, 05:31 PM
Polygon's Avatar
Polygon Polygon is offline
The Red Baron
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
Re: Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by hot_red_z28
Nice kill...

It's quite believable, most late model GT's dyno at or below 215hp to the rear wheels. They are prolly also a bit heavier than your nissan...
I would have to agree. Great kill!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2004, 06:23 PM
TatII TatII is offline
AF Fanatic
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
you what some guy had the nerve to say to me in the other 240sx forums? he said that the guy in the stang wasn't racing for real beucsae his car is faster!! what an ass. i also forgot to mention that it was cold last night and that i was creeping alittle to 9.5-10psi ish and at that dyno session at 9.5 psi i was making 247whp. oh wellz.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2004, 07:06 PM
SiXPuSHA SiXPuSHA is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SiXPuSHA
Quote:
then we finally locked eyes
Gotta love those magical moments . Nah j/k, nice kill man. I got owned by a MGT over the summer from a stop
__________________
Some Stupid mazda that's ALWAYS BROKEN!
Slow as hell and twice as ugly!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2004, 07:37 PM
HiFlow5 0's Avatar
HiFlow5 0 HiFlow5 0 is offline
Stanger
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,171
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to HiFlow5 0
Re: Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by hot_red_z28
There was one on Horsepower TV last summer. I think it was a 2000ish GT. Stock it only pulled like 187rwhp on the dyno. I have heard of others getting as high as 210-215rwhp. I'm sure there are a few freaks out there, but generally speaking, that's what your lookin at...
That wasen't a 2000ish. I believe it was a 96. There is a big difference in performance in the first gen 4.6L compared to the current 4.6L. So 187 RWHP on a stock 96 in about right because they make 215 BHP. A 99-03 have 260 BHP, which amounts to about 218.4 RWHP.
__________________
[size=1]-1950 Ford Custom, flathead V8
-2013 Ford Flex
-1999 Ford F150

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2004, 07:58 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Sorry guys, but a 99+ isnt going to dyno below 215 only if its an unhealthy pony. Autos usually dyno at around 220-225rwhp and the 5spds dyno at around 230-235 rwhp. Anything below that and go check your dealership because you got a bad running Stang.


Nice run Tat, youre lighter than the GTs and putting as much to the wheels as they are so im not surprised you beat one
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-08-2004, 09:55 PM
fatninja19 fatninja19 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
Nice kill! It's awesome when old people like to have a little fun!
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2004, 10:09 PM
Chavez408's Avatar
Chavez408 Chavez408 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chavez408 Send a message via Yahoo to Chavez408
nice win tat, and when u said u didnt think he wanted to race cus he looked old, dont let their age fool u cus everyone likes to have fun
__________________
- Its Micheal Jackson! and his black again!!! YAY!!!!!!
LandoAWD - My rolemodel!! why? because his a bad ass! beache..! and he will kick ur A$$!!

Originally Posted by Delerious93integra
and if DSM's are so great.. then why doesn't everyone own one
?


^^^ WOW!!! ^^^
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-08-2004, 10:33 PM
hot_red_z28 hot_red_z28 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to hot_red_z28 Send a message via AIM to hot_red_z28
Re: Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by DkShadow
Autos usually dyno at around 220-225rwhp and the 5spds dyno at around 230-235 rwhp.
Not calling BS, cause I don't really know, but I'd have to see some dyno sheets before buying into the 230-235hp thing... That's only like a 9-10% loss in the drivetrain, assuming they start at 260hp, and that seems like a low percentage loss to me. I could buy the 220ish hp thing though...

Unless they have more than 260hp from the factory... Which could also be the case...

About the Horsepower TV thing, thanks for the correction. I thought it was a later model 4.6. I thought it did seem to be pretty damn low for a newer one. I stand corrected...
__________________

My Project Write-Up
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-08-2004, 10:57 PM
carrrnuttt's Avatar
carrrnuttt carrrnuttt is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

http://www.svtcobraclub.com/scmceven...dyno/page3.htm

There's a stock 99 GT in that link, that dynoe'd 213-214RWHP, and they were happy with it. They said it "defied" the car's 260HP crank-rating.

There's even a video.
__________________
2002_Nissan_Maxima_6-speed
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2004, 11:52 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: me vs. current gen mustang GT

Quote:
Originally Posted by hot_red_z28
Not calling BS, cause I don't really know, but I'd have to see some dyno sheets before buying into the 230-235hp thing... That's only like a 9-10% loss in the drivetrain, assuming they start at 260hp, and that seems like a low percentage loss to me. I could buy the 220ish hp thing though...

No problem:









Those are a couple that I found

Anything below that would really seem low to me.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Street Racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts