-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-24-2003, 10:41 PM
MachoCamacho MachoCamacho is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
78 or 4th gen

Alright, for now I've started to contemplate, my moms first car she bought was a 78 camaro z28, 350 engine, pretty decent car(faster than my dads roomates corvette), I can find these for about 3000$ in my area, I was wondering if this spring i should get something around these lines until i can finally afford a good old fashion LT1 Z28, btw, 3000 is for no rust and lower than 90k miles, nice lookin i think
  #2  
Old 11-24-2003, 11:33 PM
danno_SS danno_SS is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 78 or 4th gen

Quote:
Originally Posted by MachoCamacho
Alright, for now I've started to contemplate, my moms first car she bought was a 78 camaro z28, 350 engine, pretty decent car(faster than my dads roomates corvette), I can find these for about 3000$ in my area, I was wondering if this spring i should get something around these lines until i can finally afford a good old fashion LT1 Z28, btw, 3000 is for no rust and lower than 90k miles, nice lookin i think
I'd say get the '78 and then do an LT1 stroker or H/C LS1 conversion. That would make for quite a head turner (450+HP in classic trim). I've seen 1st and 3rd gen LS1 conversions but have yet to see a 2nd gen. Just a thought.
__________________
2005 MN6 Cyclone Grey GTO
Stock: 337.0rwhp,332.8rwtq @8.2k mi

*previous car*
2002 A4 Rally Red SS Camaro
Stock:CME,Bilstein,Auburn,T-Tops,Chrome ZR-1s,BFG g-Force KD 17",SS Grille,Deck Mat,& Floor Mats
306.9 rwhp,325.8 rwtq @ 6.4k mi
Mods:SLP_LID,Airhog,LS6cam+springs
338.0rwhp,336.8rwtq
SLP_Bellow,TBB,BMR STB&LCA
  #3  
Old 11-24-2003, 11:39 PM
MachoCamacho MachoCamacho is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Also until it'd have a 350 in it stock anyways, which is a decent engine compared to todays engines
  #4  
Old 11-25-2003, 03:34 AM
LancasterWannaBe's Avatar
LancasterWannaBe LancasterWannaBe is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LancasterWannaBe
yeah but second gen's are HEAVY mofos!
It takes a lot of power to pull those things around.
However they have the classic look and if it's old enough you don't have to worry about smog checks, so you could just drop in a good old carburated BBC engine and never worry about passing smog again.

The 4th gen would be quicker with the same or less power and turn better. Braking would also be much better and it would likely get better mileage. But GM cars of the 80s and 90s do break a lot, especially the interior which is a minor thing, but it's still annoying as hell!

My friend has a 78 trans am with a 403 in it. After a bad test at school we just go out driving, break a few laws, and we feel much better. His mileage is probably similar to that of the Enzo Ferrari (8 mpg), but it's just his fun car anyway. I wouldn't recomend a car like that for a daily driver though.
  #5  
Old 11-25-2003, 06:34 PM
89IROC&RS's Avatar
89IROC&RS 89IROC&RS is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 78 or 4th gen

try looking at hotchkis for a LS1 in a second gen, if you could get your hands on an LS6, i think it would move pretty good, especialy if you hopped up the LS6 with some aftermarket goodies. and *wishlist* a lingenfelter 427cid LS motor would just make me wet my pants. but i suppose the body style is all about what you want. The second gen is a classic style with muscle car attitude, strait line brawn, and as far as im concerned, better construction all around. while the fourth then is a bit more of a tech peice with corner carving prowes and cheap plastic interior. if i had my choice, it would probly be the 78.
  #6  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:58 PM
78z28 N progress 78z28 N progress is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 78 or 4th gen

what would be the best fit and produce the most power for my 78
  #7  
Old 11-16-2006, 03:14 PM
SG007's Avatar
SG007 SG007 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 754
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SG007
Re: 78 or 4th gen

Wait for the LT1...3rd gens are awesome and their my favorite cars, but you're going to have much more power with the LT1. If you want a daily driver go that route, but if it's a 2nd car, go for the 78.
__________________

-2000 LS1 Z28-1979 Berlinetta*sold*-1992 RS 25th Anniv. 350*sold*-
  #8  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:25 PM
wrightz28's Avatar
wrightz28 wrightz28 is offline
is bring'n sexy back
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 78 or 4th gen

oh, snap, old thread

78 - Welcome to AF! Please refrain from ressurecting threads more than 3 months old.
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts