|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Who's the winner? | |||
| BMW M3 |
|
4 | 66.67% |
| C32 AMG |
|
2 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this one a tough comparison or what? Now in the past, BMW M3 has won this battle against the C36 or C43 AMG. Now we have an all new M3 and an all new C32 AMG. Who takes this fight?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Merc is an auto still, right?
If not, my vote needs to be reconsidered. Yup, still the M3. cool car |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The M3 is more edgy. Its more like an American V8. So I'll take the M3.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
M3
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The M3 only cause it's a stick.
Throw the 6-speed in the C32 and I'd take it anyday.
__________________
![]() ________________________________________ Mark Brown 1991 Volkswagen Jetta (1.8L I4/5-speed/FWD)
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
In automobile, they did a comparison, and the M3 and C32 both got 5.2 seconf 0-60 times. The M3 probably wasn't driven super-well, but with a stick, the Merc could clean the bimmer.
If only Mercedes would put a stick in their high-performance models, then we would have something
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Come on people! The C32 has a 354 Hp Supercharged AMG V-6!! It is also a family car, the M3 rocks but I think the C32 could smoke it in several catergories.
__________________
![]() ec437 on grammar; Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
whats the price of both vehicles?
remember the c32 is supercharged and the M3 is not they both have 3.2L 6-cylinder engines but the M3 haves more than 100 hp/L naturally aspirated think about the M3 after its blown can we say 450hp? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
On a different note, does the C32 pack the second highest horses per litre? Honda S2000 is first and has 120/L.
__________________
BRABUS E-V12: World's Fastest Sedan! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
um
the honda s2k is highest hp/l for n/a car. if you want a highest hp/l for a f/i car (the merc w/ a super)... the merc isnt even close, considering that there are turbo cars that are pushin at least 111 per liter... if you look at production turbos and s/c cars, they push around 100 ish... but that doesnt say much... there have been crazy stock cars prior that were pushin out way more hp/l... so compare hp/l for fi, and then for the n/a... that is where the s2k is at. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
BRABUS E-V12: World's Fastest Sedan! |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
i was simply stating that the s2k is a n/a motor... thas all i meant, im just saying that they are two diff categories, and i dint really have another f/i car in mind... it just came out...
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
The subaru impreza WRX 22B STi has a 276 hp 2.0l four, thats 140 hp per litre. It is probable closer to 150 hp per litre, though.
That is one (good) example. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
BRABUS E-V12: World's Fastest Sedan! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
what is a pure horse?
as opposed to a synthetic? also... the 911 turbo and gt2 have higher ratios... 129 for the gt2, and 116 for the turbo... |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|