|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
I don't give a crap about bling. I only want to spend $$ on stuff that's actually gonna do something. So I've been trying to figure out why CAI's don't do much better over the stock intake. Here's the conclusion I've come to... and please comment. I also believe that the Honda engineers did things for a reason; they aren't stupid. So if you can "improve" their design, it's because you either have a different goal or more budget.
The stock intake on my 97 Civic EX already is a cold air intake. Well that's what it looks like to me. The plastic piping, while bumpy on the outside, is about a 3" diameter smooth tube to the airbox. The airbox contains a flat ~6"x6" air passage area filter from the lower portion of the airbox. The airbox has a smooth 3" tube which sucks air from under the bumper in front of the right front wheel well. THIS IS THE COLD AIR LOCATION. So: - environment air enters the intake system at the underbumper corner, same as true CAI's. - piping is about 3" diameter, same as many CAI's. - advantage of this system is that the filter is located far away from the bumper intake hole and thus has a lot of immunity to splashes. (Who says that the cone has to be at the beginning of the intake anyways?) - the closed airbox shields it from the under the hood engine heat; just like the Icebox intakes. The only difference I see between the stock and aftermarket CAI's is the surface area of the filter. So, this leads me to believe that the "small, almost insignificant gains from a CAI" is because the stock intake actually shares almost everything in common with the aftermarket CAI's. I've wondered why they but such small cone filters on the CAI's, as the surface area of the cones are not much more than the surface area of the flat stock filter. Since I'm guessing that the highest restriction in an intake (up to and not including the intake manifold) is the filter itself, I would contend that sticking a massive K&N cone filter (like those big 7" jobbers) on the stock system would get probably the same gains as a CAI intake system. (Of course there's logistics like size of the airbox and how to actually attach the filter.) The other thing I'm considering doing is adding a scoop to the intake opening of the stock system at the bumper. At higher speeds, the scoop hopefully will increase the air pressure from what it was before, thereby reducing the work the engine does to suck air in. I theorize that most of the "vaccuum" noise from CAI's comes from the thousands of itty bitty turbulance points as the air gets sifted through the filter mesh. Some, but much less significant is the noise of the air vibrating the pipe edges and bumps. Thus, the enclosed airbox will reduce the noise generated by the intake. (Which is good or bad depending upon who you are.) So anyways, I think this is why aftermarket CAIs don't do much improvement to modern cars. Blah blah blah. I'm learning. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I knew it!!
I thought I was going crazy thinking the same thing. The aftermarket CAIs' tubes are smooth and polished where the stock airbox is plastic and rough I'd assume. That would probably result in lower air friction. I may be high too, but whatever the case, I'm glad I'm not the only martian around here. And what of this "scoop?" what's that all about? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I knew it!!
13 post between the two of them.
I so want to reply a lot more but work gets out it 5 minutes...so here goes the abridged version. 1. Yes colder air is located down by the bumper as opposed to higher in the engine compartment. Hence the reason why CAI are more popular. The most popular being the AEM CAI. 2. The plastic material the stock tubing is made of verses the aluminum piping AEM uses plays a big difference in temperature. The filter on the end on these aftermarket one's are better than the square block filter that is for the stock tubing. 3. The stock filter is very RESTRICTIVE. The basics of modding an engine are to provide better AIR FLOW. So the more air that can get in the engine (intake), the more exhaust can get out quicker (header/exhaust) giving more horsepower. 3b. Without the Intake, header, or exhaust (not just the muffler), there won't be much of a hp difference. The stock header and exhaust piping + muffler are very restrictive as well. 4. Going back to #3, many people make their own with nothing but a K&N cone filter, some aluminum pvc piping (i think) and a couple clamps to hold the filter to the pipe, and the pipe to the IM. You are at least thinking, and have good points to back your argument up, except the fact that the stock intake tubing is very restrictive and even muffles some of the sound. With an aftermarket intake you can actually hear something different. Cliff notes: stock piping = ridges = restrictive, different material aftermarket intakes = smoother piping = less restrictive, different material = aluminum = conducts less heat, keeps air cool.
__________________
Name's David.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: I knew it!!
Quote:
yes the stock intake is more restrictive, which means u are not gaining any power from the stock crap, by no way is it a CAI. on a side note like 3100 some posts between us!!!
__________________
*RIP* Integr8 aka Ryan *RIP* 5/29/03 www.fotki.com/esp THIS OG IS GONE retired for good. peace yall. create a crew for me |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, isnt anohter big reason the stokc air intake system doesnt work as good because the air goes through the tune,. then enters the big black box, then goes through the tube again, I thought the whole reason for an intake is the air is filtered, then goes through one solid straight shot into your engine, and that big black filter box disturbs the turbulence or whatever youd call it, cuz Ive read even just the AEM bypass valve messes the air flow up enough to where a SRI wihtou the BPV would give more power than the CAI with the BPV.
__________________
current -84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex history: -01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS -91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times) -94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle -74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z -84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: I knew it!!
Hmmm...
Quote:
Quote:
If we could wind tunnel the filter, I'd expect that there was a sudden differential at the filter as air bangs into it, finds a way through it, then gets back to intake speed. This is why I think a filter with huge area is important, and like I said in my original post, is the major reason **why the stock intake is restrictive**. At least that's my guess. Quote:
Quote:
As for the stock piping, its ribbed on the OUTSIDE, but inside, it's smooth... which is where it matters. My question about aluminum is that because the under the hood temperature is higher than the "cold outside air", then the temp differential will cause the energy to try and creep the colder air. That means, you WANT the best heat insulator possible on your intake to keep it cold. So are you saying that aluminum is a better insulator than the rubber/plastic? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
I want 5 min of my life back for reading this post.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
Quote:
Why so hostile? Did I insult your mother or something? Quote:
A CAI is not a CAI just because it sucks from the wheel and has a "smooth non turbulant path" all the way to the intake. Regardless of where the filter is, it just needs to have outside air going to it; wherever that comes from, whether it be the wheel, the cabin, the trunk, the roof, or wherever (although obviously many of those aren't practical or useful). If the stock intake brings air from the front wheel to the airbox, then that is a type of cold air. Granted, not as good as an engineered AEM CAI, but it's trying to utilize the same concept. Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
BTW, the whole thing that prompted this was (see original post) that I was wondering why (with all the "amazing" technology that goes into an after market CAI) it doesn't improve that much over the stock... even as very restrictive the stock intake is.
If adding a CAI, 421 ex header, and straight through cat back only adds less than 5% HP over the stock setup... then that tells me that the STOCK SETUP ISN'T THAT MUCH WORSE THAN THE AFTERMARKET "HIGHTECH" STUFF, unlike 30 years ago. And if the diminishing returns are expensive, then you gotta choose the right thing. Not long ago people used to rave about ram air intakes like they are about CAIs. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
It's just air coming into your engine, did you expect 300hp from a diff shaped pipe? i/h/e combos aren't great at adding (freeing up) horsepower, but they flatten out your stock, bumpy hp/tq curve lines making your hp now more efficient. Go get your car dynoed stock, then with all three i/h/e, and you'll see what I mean.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
Quote:
Quote:
Please.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
it doesnt make much difference on our cars because there is not a lot of power to start with. don't kid yourself, 5% more power is not that bad. if you started with 300 hp you would gain 15, just a slightly different way to look at it
__________________
![]() LS1 RX-7 Zoom Zoom |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Stock airbox IS a cold air intake CAI
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2000 BMW 323IT 1954 Ford F100 With every post my penis grows smaller Yakima Valley Truck Club Yakima Washington |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|