Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jcrx
B16A is a better motor, IMO, better head, IM, R/S, etc... The B18C1 is better for cruising around town, but the B16A2 makes power way high, so I would say it should be dictated by driving style. Do you like to rev real high, or more torquey low end driving.
|
Okay, The JDM B16A2 makes (numbers are flywheel HP, not at the wheels) 168 HP@7800rpm and 116ft-lbs torque@7300rpm. The USDM GSR B18C1 makes 170HP@7600 rpm and 128 ft/lbs torque@6200rpm. For only $500 more, the B18C1 is the better deal here. Greater displacement, and as a result, much better low-end torque. The HP numbers are virtually the same, sans the GSR hits a claimed peak of 2 more HP and 200 rpm lower, and no one will complain about that. I have heard the R/S ratio agruement time and time again, but the fact is the GSR has more displacement, greater torque, and in the end, is a better base to start with. This is not knocking the B16A by any means, but to say it the better motor is unfair. I mean, 7600 vs 7800 isnt too much different if you like to rev high, Plus the GSR has a 8100 RPM redline. The big advantage is GSR has far greater low-end torque. Also, if you go FI, the increased displacment will make a difference, plus lower Comperssion Ratios are an advantage for FI, every little bit counts. The JDM B16A2 has a 10.4:1 c/r, the USDM B18C1 has a 10:1 c/r. Still by no means a great FI c/r, but a little better than 10.4:1. If you are really concerned with the B16A heads better flow, a port and polish will quickly take car of that. While the head is off, re-shape the quench area for better combustion. Also, if you are seriously building up the motor, increasing the bore size when you re-sleeve and close the deck won't create a problem, and will solve that also. But I am into heavy mods and high output now. For me, the much increased low-end torque and the 1797 cc vs 1595 cc is worth $500 more dollers. If it's not worth it to him? Thats okay, the B16A isn't a bad motor, the GSR is just a better base. The increased displacement is a big difference. The increased low-end torque makes a huge difference though, especially on the street. Low-end torque rules the street.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jameskersten
15.8? wow no offense thats pretty bad. my friend with a b18c1 in his eg6 ran a 14.6 this weekend, bone stock except for intake and exhaust
|
When the GSR first came out in 94, and car and driver tested it, they ran a 15.2@93MPH 1/4 mile time on the stock GSR. So I would agree, 15.8 for a GSR in a Civic seems odd. 14.6 sounds closer to what I would expect, since your not going to drop the motor into the much lighter civic chassie and loose speed and time.