|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nitrous: Wet Vs. Dry
what's a better nitrous set up? What's the difference between the two? I've heard amateurs shouldn't use wet and stick to dry, is this true, why? Thanks for the help
__________________
-1994 Civic coupe DX |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont know your answer, but try to do a search on this, it seems like this was brought up like last week or something.
__________________
ZC stuff http://dh-racing.com http://www.thezcr.com/html/zcbook.php http://dmoore.com/crx/zc.htm http://www.jgenginedynamics.com/HOME%20PAGE http://www.theoldone.com/
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you use a wet nitrous system it would be best to use it Direct Port. The dry system would work best through the common way which is running it through you intake. It is possible to use the wet kit through the intake but there will be some wear and tear damage done to a stock engine if you go that route. Your best bet for a begining system is a simple dry set-up. Just my two cents.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
a dry nitrous sytem is asking to blow the shit out of your engine. adding nitrous without adding extra fuel is stupid and lazy.
go wet all the way. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dry: Blowback through a mis/back-fire can be a real issue. Wet is more finicky to set up but the better route.
Better still... get a turbo or go all-motor with no steroids - more kudos that way
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|