|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which one? | |||
| Subaru WRX Sti |
   
|
8 | 57.14% |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII |
  
|
6 | 42.86% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
05-29-2003, 10:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
wrx sti vs. lancer 7
inspired by the last pole and a car and driver article, which one and why. i'm for a wrx....so much faster...0-60 in 4.6! outta a 4-banger for $30,000. DAMN
__________________
Clear Corners Front and Rear Strut Bars Cold Air Intake with K&N filter Iridium Spark Plugs High Performance Plug Wires High Flow Cat (unistalled) Cool high/low beam lights All around slotted and AEM pads 
|
|
#2
05-30-2003, 04:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
the wrx isn't faster than a new evolution. Motortrend ran 0-60 in 4.5 seconds in the evo and 4.8 in the sti and they said the evo took the sti out on the track too. So my vote goes to the evo.
__________________
99 Honda Civic Si Stage 2 Clutch SPP Exhaust Short Shifter Eibach Suspension 17's 91 Honda Accord LX
|
|
#3
05-30-2003, 06:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i read car and driver (today) and they said the sti was 4.6 and the lancer was 5.0. The page after the atricle was an advertisement by mitsubishi about the evo and they said that the 0-60 was 5.1.
wow, i just check maybe 10 different websites and every was giving out totally different numbers. hmmmm....guess we gotta wait till we see them in person.
__________________
Clear Corners Front and Rear Strut Bars Cold Air Intake with K&N filter Iridium Spark Plugs High Performance Plug Wires High Flow Cat (unistalled) Cool high/low beam lights All around slotted and AEM pads
|
|
#4
05-30-2003, 01:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The name's Adrian 1990 Civic HB Si - 265.7whp/223tq @9.2psi. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 296.3whp/230tq @1bar. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 185.8whp/139tq. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 2006 G35 Coupe 6MT - Stock 2011 CR-Z - Stock
|
|
#6
07-07-2003, 04:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's here because almost everybody that has a Honda/Acura, wants one of these cars. So in a round about way it pertains to Honda/Acura. Wow, that didn't work. Just tryin to give some kind of justification for this poll, but I can't do it.
But yeah, they did the same crap when the WRX came out. I've seen anything from 5.4sec to 6.2sec 0-60 times. Some of these testers just need to stick to automatics I guess. That makes me wonder how accurate the ratings for the Integra's are? Did my car go 0-60 in 7.6sec? 8.4sec? 6.8sec? Or somewhere inbetween? Cause the only one I ever saw published was 7.6. Givin the margin of error with the WRX tests, it could have been any of these.
|
|
#8
07-07-2003, 04:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i don't want one either....choosing an '03 IS300 over either one of those
__________________
The name's Adrian 1990 Civic HB Si - 265.7whp/223tq @9.2psi. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 296.3whp/230tq @1bar. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 1991 Civic Sedan DX - 185.8whp/139tq. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills 2006 G35 Coupe 6MT - Stock 2011 CR-Z - Stock
|
|
#10
07-08-2003, 04:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
 Ok, this has been gone over many times. The EVO 7 is on paper almost exactly as fast as the same year WRX STi (please spell it right) the only differnce between the two is feel. The WRX feels softer, and is a bit friendlier to live with, while the EVO feels harder and more agresive, and provides a more involving drive. The same is true for the Current model WRX STi and the EVO 8. Unless you are refering to the USDM EVO 8 which is a detuned EVO 6 in a new body, and is quite a bit slower than a regular EVO 8 or current shape WRX STi. However this dosnt really matter as the USDM spec WRX STi has yet to hit the market.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
#11
07-08-2003, 05:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
so ulnless the us sti is worse than the rest of the world's sti the evo we have is a serious car.....
__________________
 (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
|
|
#12
07-08-2003, 10:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
When you guys are talking im assuming your talking about the Evo 8 and not the 7 because the 7 is just ass slow, i mean almost and honda/acura could beat it. Now the evo 8 is a completely different story the Evo 8 is extremely fast, but the STI is faster in the 0-60 and the 1/4, but the Evo 8 is far better on the road course as far as lateral g's (cornering) and braking goes.
__________________
Its not how fast you go it how fast you finish. Second place is the first looser Skunk2 Coil-overs Aem 2 piece intake Tanabe Exausht Throttle Body coolant bypass Apexi SAFC 2. Skunk 2 cam gear. ZEX dry nitrous system: currently 55 shot.   Best 1/4 Time: 16.402 @ 82 M.P.H w/ 2.290 60ft w/o spray 14.8@94 MPH w/ spray
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
