-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-10-2003, 06:51 PM
civickid97 civickid97 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to civickid97
b18b or b16a2??

Big question...B18b (ls teg;$2200) or b16a2($2350)
(source: hmotorsonline). Car: 97 Civic cpe dx Plans: Build engine and turbo next summer. Most people are saying go with the B18b, because it's supposed to be the best B series for turbo. But b16a2 (jdm) has 30 more horsies and vtec (I've heard the vtec's over rated stuff). I just wanna hear what you guys think. Any advice is greatly appreciated!
__________________
~Gotta Stay Civic Minded~
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2003, 06:54 PM
SiRII's Avatar
SiRII SiRII is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so far your right. you can even built up an ls v-tec. either route you go is good.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2003, 10:53 PM
KrNxRaCer00's Avatar
KrNxRaCer00 KrNxRaCer00 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,846
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KrNxRaCer00 Send a message via Yahoo to KrNxRaCer00
b18b. better for turbo, more displacement to work w/, better torque numbers outta the box. yes, vtec is over-rated.
__________________
2003 Infiniti G35

99 Yamaha YZF-R6 (sold)
2000 Acura Integra Type R (sold)
1994 Acura Integra GSR (retired/sold)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2003, 02:20 AM
B16EJ1's Avatar
B16EJ1 B16EJ1 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by KrNxRaCer00
b18b. better for turbo, more displacement to work w/, better torque numbers outta the box. yes, vtec is over-rated.
better for turbo..... yes, more displacement.......yes, better torque.......yes, Will you beat a B16A with it stock for stock or N/A fully built w/ out VTEC........NO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2003, 03:26 AM
KrNxRaCer00's Avatar
KrNxRaCer00 KrNxRaCer00 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,846
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KrNxRaCer00 Send a message via Yahoo to KrNxRaCer00
Quote:
Originally posted by B16EJ1


better for turbo..... yes, more displacement.......yes, better torque.......yes, Will you beat a B16A with it stock for stock or N/A fully built w/ out VTEC........NO.
very tru. stock for stock tho, it'd all come down to driver. i really think the b18b is a great motor to work w/, it jus lacks top end is all. but yes, build both up, an the b16 WILL come out on top (all comes down to money tho).

so...word :o
__________________
2003 Infiniti G35

99 Yamaha YZF-R6 (sold)
2000 Acura Integra Type R (sold)
1994 Acura Integra GSR (retired/sold)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2003, 04:04 PM
civickiller civickiller is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to civickiller
i think the b16 is better, it give more range so u can use a bigger turbo and it can rev higher so u get power longer. i would rathre not push a piston through the cylinder walls on the ls
__________________
Team Lonely Drivers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2003, 05:48 PM
liquid8 liquid8 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to liquid8
if you're going turbo then i say ls. cuz it has longer gears for turbo and it would be able to spool a bigger turbo up quicker. you should get blockguard or sleeves. and i would get better rods. maybe shotpeened if you were going to raise the rev limit.
__________________
"life's a bitch but god forbid the bitch divorce me" - nas
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2003, 02:38 PM
ZombieMan ZombieMan is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you're going with the b18b, it's better to just get a b20, since it's the best non vtec engine that has 160hp with the match up of the same amount of torque, i guarantee you, no b16a will beat you from the line until the end of the race if you drive right. 2200 seems kind of expensive for a b18b, you can actaully get those engine for 1500.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2003, 03:54 PM
edman24 edman24 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 547
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to edman24
well the b20 is a good choice only if you know what you are doing. you must understand that because of the bigger bore of the b20 the distance between cylinders is very small. this can mean very bad things for a turbocharged motor. if i were you i would go b18b only because its cheaper. if i had a choice though id go b16.

and why is vtec overrated? i must say that now that i own a vtec powered car, that it does make a big difference in how it pulls on the top end. with this mugen computer making the kick come in at 6200 (i think) it feels so strong. the tone of the engine changes and you instantly feel a burst of power, like nitrous or something.

so why is it overrated?
__________________
I feel bad for those who pay twice as much as i did for my car and still lose to me. The sorrow in their face is enough to bring me to tears.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2003, 06:49 PM
civickid97 civickid97 is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to civickid97
I've heard that B18B's are pretty cheap, but I've yet to see a cheap price for that motor on the net...am I the only one? I mean, if the LS swap was more than $500 (not even that much) less than the B16a2, it'd be a no brainer, but I can't seem to locate that engine around that price.

As for vtec being over rated; it seems to be a notable consensus among Honda folks. Truth be told, I've never driven a car w/vtec, so I can't say either way.

B16a2 or B18b; the journey continues...
__________________
~Gotta Stay Civic Minded~
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-12-2003, 07:19 PM
KrNxRaCer00's Avatar
KrNxRaCer00 KrNxRaCer00 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,846
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KrNxRaCer00 Send a message via Yahoo to KrNxRaCer00
edman24, i understand where u are. when i 1st got my gsr, i'd love gettin on freeways, or jus rev'n up high to feel/hear vtec scream. nitrous compared to vtec? no comparison. sit in a car w/ a 50shot an then u'll see wut im talkin bout. im not dawgin on vtec (i still enjoy it), but it ISN'T something to rely on.

jus drove a rx-7 tt, an u have no idea how nice it is to feel that type of power THROUGHOUT the rpm range. (unless u've driven a car w/ that type of power before).

not hating on honda's, i still am a great fan, but VTEC IS overrated.
__________________
2003 Infiniti G35

99 Yamaha YZF-R6 (sold)
2000 Acura Integra Type R (sold)
1994 Acura Integra GSR (retired/sold)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2003, 08:24 PM
edman24 edman24 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 547
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to edman24
i know where you are coming from too. i have been in some of the fastest cars in the world and i know what insane power feels like when its throughout the powerband. but i must say that for such cheap and small motors, the vtec is quite an invention. and yes i will compare my car to my friends integra(ls motor) with a 50 shot. i can kill him anyday in my car even when he uses nos and the nos just doesnt seem to give that much of a kick. im sure a 100 shot or more would but thats not what i was talking about. and i know vtec wont exactly make the biggest difference in a race but it helps a lot.

hehe now i can actually beat my cousins bmw 540. he still cant believe how fast this little rice rocket can go without a turbo.
__________________
I feel bad for those who pay twice as much as i did for my car and still lose to me. The sorrow in their face is enough to bring me to tears.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2003, 08:35 PM
KrNxRaCer00's Avatar
KrNxRaCer00 KrNxRaCer00 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,846
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KrNxRaCer00 Send a message via Yahoo to KrNxRaCer00
Quote:
Originally posted by edman24
i know where you are coming from too. i have been in some of the fastest cars in the world and i know what insane power feels like when its throughout the powerband. but i must say that for such cheap and small motors, the vtec is quite an invention. and yes i will compare my car to my friends integra(ls motor) with a 50 shot. i can kill him anyday in my car even when he uses nos and the nos just doesnt seem to give that much of a kick. im sure a 100 shot or more would but thats not what i was talking about. and i know vtec wont exactly make the biggest difference in a race but it helps a lot.

hehe now i can actually beat my cousins bmw 540. he still cant believe how fast this little rice rocket can go without a turbo.
u also have to remember that u have an ls/vtec. so u have the great lowend of the ls, an the strong top-end of a vtec motor.

i completely agree that VTEC is a GREAT invention (anything that can get 240hp from a 2.0 liter motor is doin something rite), but i do think that some ppl over-play how big of a difference it makes. when u compare it to turbo's spooling an feeling that, it is nothing...nor even to a shot of nitrous IMO (an my gsr pulls hard for being jus i/h/e when i hit vtec)
__________________
2003 Infiniti G35

99 Yamaha YZF-R6 (sold)
2000 Acura Integra Type R (sold)
1994 Acura Integra GSR (retired/sold)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-12-2003, 10:12 PM
ZombieMan ZombieMan is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
when i mention about getting a b20, i'm not talking about putting on a turbo, i rather have a good even ratio between hp and torque instead of the span you see on vtec motors. since honda created their best car with a N/A engine, i blieve there's no reason why a turbo is needed for a honda motor.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts