-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 11-19-2006, 07:50 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod_chevyz
I thought the opposite. fwd + some power = easier to hook up than rwd + some power.

Ive seen a lot more mustang GT's on the road than i have GXP Grand Prix. How many have you murdered on the road?

He hasnt gotten next to one that has been able to pass it (stock). Off the line, or at a roll. Im guessing because it has more under the hood (5.3 vs 4.6).

He says the same thing, the mustangs go up in smoke while he can get a launch without breaking traction (tcs off, paddle shifted).

With the TCS on, they will not spin the tires the limiter kills the capability to roast the tires. You might get about a half second squeak of traction loss than the tcs takes over. Maybe the owner of the GXP should have used the paddle shifter built into the steering wheel and left the tcs on because thats exactly what its for.

I agree with they probably cant get mid 13's but they are no stranger to high 13's wich is what i hear the mustangs get on average. Its strange to hear that a 4 door car even coming close to the new mustangs. In the next few years if ford doesnt use 5.4's and 6 speeds as a standard for the mustangs, just about everything GM makes considered a performance car will pass them.(once again not to talk shit...FACT)
never raced one on the road.. one time i lined up against one and as i said he ran high 14s.. they should be fast from a roll.. also FWD with high performance will spin more than RWD cuz RWD has some weight transfer, when FWD lift the nose up and loose some weight up front. sure if you dont know how to launch a RWD car, you will do nothing but spin. 303hp is impressive.. i am not telling these just beacuse i own 06 stang GT.. i don't care.. truth is truth.. they should be close to 05+stang GT but i really do not think they are faster. 303hp and 323tq..( i have idea if they are underrated) and also 3600lbs just the car + driver weight. my car weights around 3600 with me in it. and 05+ stangs dynos around 265-270rwhp which shows they are underated. in reality they have 315-325 crank hp. ( i dont know about tq.) i think those thinks can beat 05+ stang GTs around 60-70mph roll races. i HIGHLY doubt they got chance from a dig with the right driver against 05+ stangs GTs. also there was that chevy malibu SS at track, auto and i know they are 303hp v8 too ( maybe the same engine, i don't know) and she could't dig into 14s that day.. might be driver error.. but how big error can a driver have with auto tranny..?

most people i met talked bad about 05+ stang GTs..including me.. but now i got a chance to own one and those comments were not true about 05+ stangs.. 13.4 is pretty fast for a car and 05+ stang GTs can run that time stock on stock rubber.

regardless, for a family sedan, 303hp is respectable.. i will kkeep my eye on the road and see if i can find one to race
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-19-2006, 08:09 PM
hotrod_chevyz's Avatar
hotrod_chevyz hotrod_chevyz is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

POST 1000! whoopidee-doo>

I really like the new mustangs. They look good and are pretty quick. Ford has an edge on the market as of now, but with GM's current future plans im hoping ford will cut loose some reasonably priced 5.4 v-8 models in the future. Just to keep shit interesting.

The malibus do have the same motor. They have softer suspension than the grand prix tho.

The grand prix have paddle shift, i dont think any other GM does as of right now except the corvettes. I do wonder if the paddle shift helps any tho. After all, its a program too.

This years grand prix GXP is the first one in years to have a v-8. They probably have a lot of bugs to work out. Supposedly they are going to make it a RWD and drop the GP nameplate in the next few years, and start calling them G-8's. By 2010 i hear GM will be returning some other models back into RWD v-8 such as the impala. I wonder what is to become of the Monte Carlo's.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-19-2006, 09:13 PM
Rally Sport's Avatar
Rally Sport Rally Sport is offline
Is eating.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Rally Sport Send a message via MSN to Rally Sport
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Malibu SS's come with the 3.9L V6.. packs 240 HP.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-19-2006, 09:48 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rally Sport
Malibu SS's come with the 3.9L V6.. packs 240 HP.
i am VERY sure, malibu SS is FWD v-8 with 303 hp
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-19-2006, 09:50 PM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod_chevyz
POST 1000! whoopidee-doo>

I really like the new mustangs. They look good and are pretty quick. Ford has an edge on the market as of now, but with GM's current future plans im hoping ford will cut loose some reasonably priced 5.4 v-8 models in the future. Just to keep shit interesting.

The malibus do have the same motor. They have softer suspension than the grand prix tho.

The grand prix have paddle shift, i dont think any other GM does as of right now except the corvettes. I do wonder if the paddle shift helps any tho. After all, its a program too.

This years grand prix GXP is the first one in years to have a v-8. They probably have a lot of bugs to work out. Supposedly they are going to make it a RWD and drop the GP nameplate in the next few years, and start calling them G-8's. By 2010 i hear GM will be returning some other models back into RWD v-8 such as the impala. I wonder what is to become of the Monte Carlo's.
GM will always be faster than Ford!! ford is using forced induction to keep up with GM. just imagine.. in 1998, new stang GT came with 220hp and transam / camaro came with underrated 305hp. sure they made SVT cobras with 305hp but i swear trans am will kill 98 cobras allday cuz i beat 98 cobra with MT ET steets, gears, intake, tune and suspension..his best was 13.5 and mine was 13.4 and another driver got in and he ran 13.4 and i ran 13.6.. imagine i am bone stock and he had mods + DRs. and still ran even.. regardless.. cobras are great cars.. f-bodies are great cars and stang GTs SUCKS!! (IMO)
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-19-2006, 10:13 PM
hotrod_chevyz's Avatar
hotrod_chevyz hotrod_chevyz is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rally Sport
Malibu SS's come with the 3.9L V6.. packs 240 HP.
Oh snap! Sorry about the bunk data! i was thinking of the SS Impala. Your right the malibu SS does have a 3.9.

EDIT: I was also wrong about only 2 cars having paddle shift. My 1000th post was a POS!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-19-2006, 11:20 PM
Rally Sport's Avatar
Rally Sport Rally Sport is offline
Is eating.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Rally Sport Send a message via MSN to Rally Sport
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by doodad
i am VERY sure, malibu SS is FWD v-8 with 303 hp
http://www.chevrolet.com/pop/malibu/..._engine_en.jsp
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-20-2006, 01:43 AM
doodad's Avatar
doodad doodad is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doodad Send a message via Yahoo to doodad
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

isn't this malibu SS?? is so then i have been hanging around with wrong info. i have always thought these are Malibu SS.

Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-20-2006, 06:19 PM
Rally Sport's Avatar
Rally Sport Rally Sport is offline
Is eating.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Rally Sport Send a message via MSN to Rally Sport
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Erdal.. who you trying to kid, really? Even the pic URL says Impala.

http://a904.g.akamai.net/7/904/506/v...ss_rear343.jpg
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-20-2006, 06:36 PM
silverado122775's Avatar
silverado122775 silverado122775 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

Quote:
Originally Posted by philly rs
um maybe i missed something...but did u say a stock ws6 has 330 hp? hell an ss camaro isnt rated that high...i wouldnt give any ls1 any more than 315 max.....and that aint even to the wheels.
WS6 and a SS run 345hp at the crank with the SLP option otherwise it is 320HP at the crank.
__________________

2000 Silverado Z71, 5.3L, K&N GenII Air Intake, Y-pipe Exhaust (no muffler), Bosch Platnium +4 plugs, 242k miles and still running.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-20-2006, 07:15 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

LS1 WS.6 was not done by SLP.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:53 PM
ZL1power69's Avatar
ZL1power69 ZL1power69 is offline
GM S-Series Mod
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

and remember in 01 and 02 some SS's and Firehawks snuck out with LS6's
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2
Performance Mods: Numerous
Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough
Exterior Mods: Just Right

1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red
Low 11 sec sleeper
.030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends....
My Cardomain
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:59 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

As well as ANY LS1 car did in 2002.
Just the block though....did not have an effect on power output.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-20-2006, 10:33 PM
ZL1power69's Avatar
ZL1power69 ZL1power69 is offline
GM S-Series Mod
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

yea i wasn't sure if they had the Ls6 heads too or not, just the block and intake manifold. but, i knew a guy a year or so ago that had an 01 firehawk with automatic and stock it dynoed at 320-330rwhp. didn't know all LS1 f-bods in 02 had the LS6 block. i remember hearing that 10% of 01 models and 20% of 02 models had them.
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2
Performance Mods: Numerous
Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough
Exterior Mods: Just Right

1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red
Low 11 sec sleeper
.030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends....
My Cardomain
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-20-2006, 10:38 PM
Mr. Luos's Avatar
Mr. Luos Mr. Luos is offline
Firebird Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7

No way an Auto should dyno that high.
Unless the SAE correction factor was .96 or something.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747
Stock'ish'
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro | Firebird > Camaro Discussions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts