|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
most people i met talked bad about 05+ stang GTs..including me.. but now i got a chance to own one and those comments were not true about 05+ stangs.. 13.4 is pretty fast for a car and 05+ stang GTs can run that time stock on stock rubber. regardless, for a family sedan, 303hp is respectable.. i will kkeep my eye on the road and see if i can find one to race
|
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
POST 1000! whoopidee-doo>
I really like the new mustangs. They look good and are pretty quick. Ford has an edge on the market as of now, but with GM's current future plans im hoping ford will cut loose some reasonably priced 5.4 v-8 models in the future. Just to keep shit interesting. The malibus do have the same motor. They have softer suspension than the grand prix tho. The grand prix have paddle shift, i dont think any other GM does as of right now except the corvettes. I do wonder if the paddle shift helps any tho. After all, its a program too. This years grand prix GXP is the first one in years to have a v-8. They probably have a lot of bugs to work out. Supposedly they are going to make it a RWD and drop the GP nameplate in the next few years, and start calling them G-8's. By 2010 i hear GM will be returning some other models back into RWD v-8 such as the impala. I wonder what is to become of the Monte Carlo's. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Malibu SS's come with the 3.9L V6.. packs 240 HP.
__________________
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
|
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
sure they made SVT cobras with 305hp but i swear trans am will kill 98 cobras allday cuz i beat 98 cobra with MT ET steets, gears, intake, tune and suspension..his best was 13.5 and mine was 13.4 and another driver got in and he ran 13.4 and i ran 13.6.. imagine i am bone stock and he had mods + DRs. and still ran even.. regardless.. cobras are great cars.. f-bodies are great cars and stang GTs SUCKS!! (IMO)
|
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
EDIT: I was also wrong about only 2 cars having paddle shift. My 1000th post was a POS! |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
isn't this malibu SS?? is so then i have been hanging around with wrong info. i have always thought these are Malibu SS.
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Erdal.. who you trying to kid, really? Even the pic URL says Impala.
http://a904.g.akamai.net/7/904/506/v...ss_rear343.jpg
__________________
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() 2000 Silverado Z71, 5.3L, K&N GenII Air Intake, Y-pipe Exhaust (no muffler), Bosch Platnium +4 plugs, 242k miles and still running. |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
LS1 WS.6 was not done by SLP.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
and remember in 01 and 02 some SS's and Firehawks snuck out with LS6's
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2 Performance Mods: Numerous Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough Exterior Mods: Just Right 1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red Low 11 sec sleeper ![]() .030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends.... My Cardomain |
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
As well as ANY LS1 car did in 2002.
Just the block though....did not have an effect on power output.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
yea i wasn't sure if they had the Ls6 heads too or not, just the block and intake manifold. but, i knew a guy a year or so ago that had an 01 firehawk with automatic and stock it dynoed at 320-330rwhp. didn't know all LS1 f-bods in 02 had the LS6 block. i remember hearing that 10% of 01 models and 20% of 02 models had them.
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2 Performance Mods: Numerous Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough Exterior Mods: Just Right 1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red Low 11 sec sleeper ![]() .030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends.... My Cardomain |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 89 Mustang GT 5.0 VS. 98-02 WS6 Trans Am LS1 5.7
No way an Auto should dyno that high.
Unless the SAE correction factor was .96 or something.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|