Audi TT vs. BMW M Roadster vs. Honda S2000 vs. Porsche Boxster

[F20C]

Originally posted by Euro19
I strongly think the S2000 doesn´t compares to neither of these, aren´t we talking about some sport roadsters with pedigree?? Instead of the S2000 you should have put the Mercedes SLK. Shame on you.
And I think AF is oriented to the whole comunity of car lovers, not only USA so don´t be selfish that isn´t nice.
Anywise I´ll go with the Porsche, I kinda like the TT.

So S2000 is not a sports roadster in your mind?

[Z06Lover]

Originally posted by Euro19
I strongly think the S2000 doesn´t compares to neither of these, aren´t we talking about some sport roadsters with pedigree?? Instead of the S2000 you should have put the Mercedes SLK. Shame on you.
And I think AF is oriented to the whole comunity of car lovers, not only USA so don´t be selfish that isn´t nice.
Anywise I´ll go with the Porsche, I kinda like the TT.

obviously you have never driven either the mercedes or the S2000. Cuz, if you had...you would know the mercedes is a touring car and the S2000 is a pure sports car.

[gang$tarr]

Originally posted by Euro19
I strongly think the S2000 doesn´t compares to neither of these, aren´t we talking about some sport roadsters with pedigree?? Instead of the S2000 you should have put the Mercedes SLK. Shame on you.
And I think AF is oriented to the whole comunity of car lovers, not only USA so don´t be selfish that isn´t nice.
Anywise I´ll go with the Porsche, I kinda like the TT.

hahah LOL!! the S2000 fits in perfectly with those, i think the Audi TT doesn't belong because of it's shit performance
Same price range, with the S2000 giving a little more value. The S2000 is a roadster like the rest. The S2000 is faster than almost all of them (and it's only 0.1s 0-60mph slower then the fastest)

I really don't see how it would not fit in

[Euro19]

Yes I know the S2000 fits perfectly if you see it from a performance angle, of course is a Sports cars, never said it wasn´t, is just that for the price range and brand (fancy), you would usually only compare Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Acura.

[gang$tarr]

The S2000 is in the same price range as those other cars, it's only a little bit less

[texan]

Originally posted by Euro19
Yes I know the S2000 fits perfectly if you see it from a performance angle, of course is a Sports cars, never said it wasn´t, is just that for the price range and brand (fancy), you would usually only compare Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Acura.

I guess I can see your point, but let's define what a comparison worth talking about should be: comparing two like cars (in design and ability) which compete with one another for market share on value and performance. Basically, what do you get for your dollar in terms of quality, reliability, performance and subjective likes/dislikes? And in that vein, the S2000 deserves to be listed in ANY comparison of roadsters.

BTW, Acura is just a name Honda drummed up to keep buyers like you from focusing on the Honda nameplate instead of the car you are buying. I wouldn't care if the S2000 was made by Yugo, it's a damn great car and a soild value in it's market segment. Buyers who spend money on a nameplate and not the car are sorely out of touch with why 95% of people buy cars.

[F20C]

Originally posted by Euro19
Yes I know the S2000 fits perfectly if you see it from a performance angle, of course is a Sports cars, never said it wasn´t, is just that for the price range and brand (fancy), you would usually only compare Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Acura.

You would need to cough up the dough for SLK32 AMG, M Roadster (315 hp) and Boxter S to have a better comparison from performance angle. All the lesser offering are not worth the time.